{"title":"资源丰富国家经济增长差异的驱动因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Growth divergence in resource-rich countries extends the debate over the resource curse hypothesis. The present study examines the relationship between natural resources and economic growth and its transmission channel, with panel data from 95 countries and between 1970 and 2017. It applies two different models such as Panel CS-ARDL and System-GMM to obtain a robust result of the relationship between natural resources and economic growth. The novelty of this study lies in the fact that it attempts to explain the growth divergence in resource-rich countries by examining the impact of natural resources on economic growth and its transmission channels for each per capita income group. CS-ARDL model does not confirm the results from system-GMM, which indicates the existence of resource curse for the panel of all countries. The other results from CS-ARDL support the evidence for the resource curse only in the low income countries and the blessing hypothesis in the developed ones. Low investment and poor total factor productivity are shown to be among the transmission channel of the negative impact of natural resource on economic growth in the developing country.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The driving factors of economic growth divergence in resource-rich countries\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Growth divergence in resource-rich countries extends the debate over the resource curse hypothesis. The present study examines the relationship between natural resources and economic growth and its transmission channel, with panel data from 95 countries and between 1970 and 2017. It applies two different models such as Panel CS-ARDL and System-GMM to obtain a robust result of the relationship between natural resources and economic growth. The novelty of this study lies in the fact that it attempts to explain the growth divergence in resource-rich countries by examining the impact of natural resources on economic growth and its transmission channels for each per capita income group. CS-ARDL model does not confirm the results from system-GMM, which indicates the existence of resource curse for the panel of all countries. The other results from CS-ARDL support the evidence for the resource curse only in the low income countries and the blessing hypothesis in the developed ones. Low investment and poor total factor productivity are shown to be among the transmission channel of the negative impact of natural resource on economic growth in the developing country.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724006251\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724006251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The driving factors of economic growth divergence in resource-rich countries
Growth divergence in resource-rich countries extends the debate over the resource curse hypothesis. The present study examines the relationship between natural resources and economic growth and its transmission channel, with panel data from 95 countries and between 1970 and 2017. It applies two different models such as Panel CS-ARDL and System-GMM to obtain a robust result of the relationship between natural resources and economic growth. The novelty of this study lies in the fact that it attempts to explain the growth divergence in resource-rich countries by examining the impact of natural resources on economic growth and its transmission channels for each per capita income group. CS-ARDL model does not confirm the results from system-GMM, which indicates the existence of resource curse for the panel of all countries. The other results from CS-ARDL support the evidence for the resource curse only in the low income countries and the blessing hypothesis in the developed ones. Low investment and poor total factor productivity are shown to be among the transmission channel of the negative impact of natural resource on economic growth in the developing country.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.