任务复杂性和协作写作对 L2 句法复杂性发展的影响:自我决定理论视角

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Kaixuan Wang , Lawrence Jun Zhang , Mingzhe Wang , Yijing Wu , Maria Cooper
{"title":"任务复杂性和协作写作对 L2 句法复杂性发展的影响:自我决定理论视角","authors":"Kaixuan Wang ,&nbsp;Lawrence Jun Zhang ,&nbsp;Mingzhe Wang ,&nbsp;Yijing Wu ,&nbsp;Maria Cooper","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Collaborative writing is well acknowledged as an effective pedagogical practice facilitating L2 learners’ writing performance and motivation. Yet, little is known about whether collaborative writing with various cognitive demands can contribute differently to L2 writers’ syntactical complexity development in their later individual writing. To address such research gap, this research investigated how task complexity and collaborative writing would impact L2 learners’ syntactical complexity development under the guidance of Self-Determination Theory (SDT), with a specific focus on the emotional experiences in explaining the learning processes in collaborative writing. 126 Chinese post-graduate EFL learners were assigned to four conditions: three experimental groups and one control group. Experimental group participants received three rounds of collaborative writing interventions varying in different cognitive demands, manipulated through <u>+</u>planning time, and <u>+</u>few elements, while control group participants were instructed regularly. Participants’ pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test writing were analysed for overall level, coordinate level, subordinate level, and phrasal level syntactical complexity with the automatic L2 syntactical complexity analyser. Mixed ANOVA results revealed that collaborative writing interventions manifested positive effects on Chinese EFL learners' syntactic complexity development. Positive effects of task complexity were also observed. Theoretical and pedagogical implications were discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 102035"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000778/pdfft?md5=fe47562fc8a8ec58c77df16137bacd66&pid=1-s2.0-S0023969024000778-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of task complexity and collaborative writing on L2 syntactical complexity development: A self-determination theory perspective\",\"authors\":\"Kaixuan Wang ,&nbsp;Lawrence Jun Zhang ,&nbsp;Mingzhe Wang ,&nbsp;Yijing Wu ,&nbsp;Maria Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Collaborative writing is well acknowledged as an effective pedagogical practice facilitating L2 learners’ writing performance and motivation. Yet, little is known about whether collaborative writing with various cognitive demands can contribute differently to L2 writers’ syntactical complexity development in their later individual writing. To address such research gap, this research investigated how task complexity and collaborative writing would impact L2 learners’ syntactical complexity development under the guidance of Self-Determination Theory (SDT), with a specific focus on the emotional experiences in explaining the learning processes in collaborative writing. 126 Chinese post-graduate EFL learners were assigned to four conditions: three experimental groups and one control group. Experimental group participants received three rounds of collaborative writing interventions varying in different cognitive demands, manipulated through <u>+</u>planning time, and <u>+</u>few elements, while control group participants were instructed regularly. Participants’ pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test writing were analysed for overall level, coordinate level, subordinate level, and phrasal level syntactical complexity with the automatic L2 syntactical complexity analyser. Mixed ANOVA results revealed that collaborative writing interventions manifested positive effects on Chinese EFL learners' syntactic complexity development. Positive effects of task complexity were also observed. Theoretical and pedagogical implications were discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000778/pdfft?md5=fe47562fc8a8ec58c77df16137bacd66&pid=1-s2.0-S0023969024000778-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000778\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000778","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合作写作被公认为是一种有效的教学实践,可以促进 L2 学习者的写作表现和写作动机。然而,对于不同认知要求的协作写作是否会对 L2 写作者日后个人写作的句法复杂性发展产生不同的影响,人们却知之甚少。为了填补这一研究空白,本研究在自我决定理论(SDT)的指导下,探讨了任务复杂性和协作写作如何影响 L2 学习者的句法复杂性发展,并特别关注解释协作写作学习过程中的情感体验。126名中国研究生EFL学习者被分配到四个条件下:三个实验组和一个对照组。实验组学员接受了三轮不同认知要求的协作写作干预,通过 "+计划时间 "和 "+少量元素 "进行操作,而对照组学员则定期接受指导。使用自动 L2 句法复杂性分析仪对参与者的前测、后测和延迟后测写作进行了整体水平、坐标水平、从属水平和短语水平句法复杂性分析。混合方差分析结果显示,合作写作干预对中国英语学习者的句法复杂性发展有积极影响。任务复杂性也有积极影响。研究还讨论了其理论和教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of task complexity and collaborative writing on L2 syntactical complexity development: A self-determination theory perspective

Collaborative writing is well acknowledged as an effective pedagogical practice facilitating L2 learners’ writing performance and motivation. Yet, little is known about whether collaborative writing with various cognitive demands can contribute differently to L2 writers’ syntactical complexity development in their later individual writing. To address such research gap, this research investigated how task complexity and collaborative writing would impact L2 learners’ syntactical complexity development under the guidance of Self-Determination Theory (SDT), with a specific focus on the emotional experiences in explaining the learning processes in collaborative writing. 126 Chinese post-graduate EFL learners were assigned to four conditions: three experimental groups and one control group. Experimental group participants received three rounds of collaborative writing interventions varying in different cognitive demands, manipulated through +planning time, and +few elements, while control group participants were instructed regularly. Participants’ pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test writing were analysed for overall level, coordinate level, subordinate level, and phrasal level syntactical complexity with the automatic L2 syntactical complexity analyser. Mixed ANOVA results revealed that collaborative writing interventions manifested positive effects on Chinese EFL learners' syntactic complexity development. Positive effects of task complexity were also observed. Theoretical and pedagogical implications were discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信