利用地面和机载激光雷达估算斜坡墙的可售和不可售木材量

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
{"title":"利用地面和机载激光雷达估算斜坡墙的可售和不可售木材量","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Slash walls are an effective forest management practice to prevent deer herbivory and promote forest regeneration following a timber harvest. However, the material cost, i.e. amount of wood material, needed for quality slash walls is unknown or at best based on highly uncertain empirical estimation. Quantifying how total and merchantable timber wood volume varies with width and height across slash walls will facilitate future planning and application of slash walls. In this study, we estimated wood volume per unit length (∼30.48 m) from total stem cross-sectional area in 40 randomly selected cut-through passages cut into 14 slash walls located at Cornell University’s Arnot Teaching and Research Forest (ATRF) in south-central New York. Within each passage we used Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) to identify individual stems and obtain cross-sectional surface area. We found that TLS derived stem diameters were highly consistent with manual stem diameter measurements for 10 selected wall passages (N = 308, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.933, RMSE = 1.881 cm). However, TLS tends to underestimate total cross-sectional area due to omission of small stem cross-sections (diameter &lt; 5.08 cm). Cross-sections of small stems often have a low number of total points even when point density is high, especially when they are not facing the scanner. They are also more vulnerable to occlusion (i.e., lack of points due to blocking by other stems). TLS-based wood volume estimates were similar across both short and tall slash walls in the study with an average volume of 21.34 m<sup>3</sup>/30 m for short slash walls and 21.50 m<sup>3</sup>/30 m for tall slash walls, corresponding to 16.9 t dry biomass /30 m and 17.0 t dry biomass /30 m respectively. The small difference in woody volume was due to tall slash walls achieving additional height mainly through non-compacted small diameter crown and brush tops that have little woody volume. Average merchantable (diameter &gt; 15.24 cm) and non-merchantable (diameter &lt; 15.24 cm) timber fraction was 68.75 % and 31.35 % for short slash walls and 65.04 % and 34.96 % for tall slash walls. We further assessed slash wall height and width using Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) for eight other tall slash walls. We found TLS measurements are representative of whole slash wall height and width variability based on ALS measurements. Our results provide novel data and methodology to estimate the construction cost of slash walls which are critical for optimizing slash wall applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating merchantable and non-merchantable wood volume in slash walls using terrestrial and airborne LiDAR\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Slash walls are an effective forest management practice to prevent deer herbivory and promote forest regeneration following a timber harvest. However, the material cost, i.e. amount of wood material, needed for quality slash walls is unknown or at best based on highly uncertain empirical estimation. Quantifying how total and merchantable timber wood volume varies with width and height across slash walls will facilitate future planning and application of slash walls. In this study, we estimated wood volume per unit length (∼30.48 m) from total stem cross-sectional area in 40 randomly selected cut-through passages cut into 14 slash walls located at Cornell University’s Arnot Teaching and Research Forest (ATRF) in south-central New York. Within each passage we used Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) to identify individual stems and obtain cross-sectional surface area. We found that TLS derived stem diameters were highly consistent with manual stem diameter measurements for 10 selected wall passages (N = 308, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.933, RMSE = 1.881 cm). However, TLS tends to underestimate total cross-sectional area due to omission of small stem cross-sections (diameter &lt; 5.08 cm). Cross-sections of small stems often have a low number of total points even when point density is high, especially when they are not facing the scanner. They are also more vulnerable to occlusion (i.e., lack of points due to blocking by other stems). TLS-based wood volume estimates were similar across both short and tall slash walls in the study with an average volume of 21.34 m<sup>3</sup>/30 m for short slash walls and 21.50 m<sup>3</sup>/30 m for tall slash walls, corresponding to 16.9 t dry biomass /30 m and 17.0 t dry biomass /30 m respectively. The small difference in woody volume was due to tall slash walls achieving additional height mainly through non-compacted small diameter crown and brush tops that have little woody volume. Average merchantable (diameter &gt; 15.24 cm) and non-merchantable (diameter &lt; 15.24 cm) timber fraction was 68.75 % and 31.35 % for short slash walls and 65.04 % and 34.96 % for tall slash walls. We further assessed slash wall height and width using Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) for eight other tall slash walls. We found TLS measurements are representative of whole slash wall height and width variability based on ALS measurements. Our results provide novel data and methodology to estimate the construction cost of slash walls which are critical for optimizing slash wall applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724005231\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724005231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

林渣墙是一种有效的森林管理方法,可在木材采伐后防止鹿的食草行为并促进森林再生。然而,优质斜林墙所需的材料成本(即木质材料的数量)尚不清楚,或者充其量只是基于高度不确定的经验估算。量化斜坡墙的总木材量和可销售木材量随宽度和高度的变化情况,将有助于斜坡墙的未来规划和应用。在这项研究中,我们从位于纽约中南部康奈尔大学阿诺教学与研究林(ATRF)的 14 个斜伐墙中随机选取了 40 个切口通道,根据总茎横截面积估算了单位长度(30.48 米)的木材蓄积量。在每个通道内,我们使用地面激光扫描(TLS)来识别单个茎干,并获得横截面积。我们发现,TLS得出的茎干直径与人工测量的10个选定壁通道的茎干直径高度一致(N = 308,R2 = 0.933,RMSE = 1.881厘米)。不过,由于遗漏了小茎横截面(直径< 5.08厘米),TLS往往会低估总横截面积。即使点密度较高,小茎横截面的总点数也往往较少,尤其是当它们不面向扫描仪时。它们也更容易受到遮挡(即由于其他茎干的遮挡而导致点数不足)的影响。在研究中,基于 TLS 的木质体积估计值在高矮斜坡墙中相似,高矮斜坡墙的平均体积为 21.34 立方米/30 米,而矮斜坡墙的平均体积为 21.50 立方米/30 米,分别相当于 16.9 吨干生物量/30 米和 17.0 吨干生物量/30 米。木质容积差异较小的原因是,高大的斜坡墙主要通过未压实的小直径树冠和灌木丛顶端来增加高度,而这些树冠和灌木丛顶端的木质容积很小。矮斜面墙的平均可销售木材(直径为 15.24 厘米)和不可销售木材(直径为 15.24 厘米)比例分别为 68.75 % 和 31.35 %,高斜面墙的平均可销售木材(直径为 15.24 厘米)和不可销售木材(直径为 15.24 厘米)比例分别为 65.04 % 和 34.96 %。我们还使用机载激光扫描(ALS)技术对另外八面高斜坡墙的斜坡墙高度和宽度进行了进一步评估。根据 ALS 测量结果,我们发现 TLS 测量结果能够代表整个斜坡墙高度和宽度的变化。我们的研究结果为估算斜墙的建造成本提供了新颖的数据和方法,这对于优化斜墙应用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating merchantable and non-merchantable wood volume in slash walls using terrestrial and airborne LiDAR

Slash walls are an effective forest management practice to prevent deer herbivory and promote forest regeneration following a timber harvest. However, the material cost, i.e. amount of wood material, needed for quality slash walls is unknown or at best based on highly uncertain empirical estimation. Quantifying how total and merchantable timber wood volume varies with width and height across slash walls will facilitate future planning and application of slash walls. In this study, we estimated wood volume per unit length (∼30.48 m) from total stem cross-sectional area in 40 randomly selected cut-through passages cut into 14 slash walls located at Cornell University’s Arnot Teaching and Research Forest (ATRF) in south-central New York. Within each passage we used Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) to identify individual stems and obtain cross-sectional surface area. We found that TLS derived stem diameters were highly consistent with manual stem diameter measurements for 10 selected wall passages (N = 308, R2 = 0.933, RMSE = 1.881 cm). However, TLS tends to underestimate total cross-sectional area due to omission of small stem cross-sections (diameter < 5.08 cm). Cross-sections of small stems often have a low number of total points even when point density is high, especially when they are not facing the scanner. They are also more vulnerable to occlusion (i.e., lack of points due to blocking by other stems). TLS-based wood volume estimates were similar across both short and tall slash walls in the study with an average volume of 21.34 m3/30 m for short slash walls and 21.50 m3/30 m for tall slash walls, corresponding to 16.9 t dry biomass /30 m and 17.0 t dry biomass /30 m respectively. The small difference in woody volume was due to tall slash walls achieving additional height mainly through non-compacted small diameter crown and brush tops that have little woody volume. Average merchantable (diameter > 15.24 cm) and non-merchantable (diameter < 15.24 cm) timber fraction was 68.75 % and 31.35 % for short slash walls and 65.04 % and 34.96 % for tall slash walls. We further assessed slash wall height and width using Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) for eight other tall slash walls. We found TLS measurements are representative of whole slash wall height and width variability based on ALS measurements. Our results provide novel data and methodology to estimate the construction cost of slash walls which are critical for optimizing slash wall applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信