{"title":"利用地面和机载激光雷达估算斜坡墙的可售和不可售木材量","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Slash walls are an effective forest management practice to prevent deer herbivory and promote forest regeneration following a timber harvest. However, the material cost, i.e. amount of wood material, needed for quality slash walls is unknown or at best based on highly uncertain empirical estimation. Quantifying how total and merchantable timber wood volume varies with width and height across slash walls will facilitate future planning and application of slash walls. In this study, we estimated wood volume per unit length (∼30.48 m) from total stem cross-sectional area in 40 randomly selected cut-through passages cut into 14 slash walls located at Cornell University’s Arnot Teaching and Research Forest (ATRF) in south-central New York. Within each passage we used Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) to identify individual stems and obtain cross-sectional surface area. We found that TLS derived stem diameters were highly consistent with manual stem diameter measurements for 10 selected wall passages (N = 308, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.933, RMSE = 1.881 cm). However, TLS tends to underestimate total cross-sectional area due to omission of small stem cross-sections (diameter < 5.08 cm). Cross-sections of small stems often have a low number of total points even when point density is high, especially when they are not facing the scanner. They are also more vulnerable to occlusion (i.e., lack of points due to blocking by other stems). TLS-based wood volume estimates were similar across both short and tall slash walls in the study with an average volume of 21.34 m<sup>3</sup>/30 m for short slash walls and 21.50 m<sup>3</sup>/30 m for tall slash walls, corresponding to 16.9 t dry biomass /30 m and 17.0 t dry biomass /30 m respectively. The small difference in woody volume was due to tall slash walls achieving additional height mainly through non-compacted small diameter crown and brush tops that have little woody volume. Average merchantable (diameter > 15.24 cm) and non-merchantable (diameter < 15.24 cm) timber fraction was 68.75 % and 31.35 % for short slash walls and 65.04 % and 34.96 % for tall slash walls. We further assessed slash wall height and width using Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) for eight other tall slash walls. We found TLS measurements are representative of whole slash wall height and width variability based on ALS measurements. Our results provide novel data and methodology to estimate the construction cost of slash walls which are critical for optimizing slash wall applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating merchantable and non-merchantable wood volume in slash walls using terrestrial and airborne LiDAR\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Slash walls are an effective forest management practice to prevent deer herbivory and promote forest regeneration following a timber harvest. However, the material cost, i.e. amount of wood material, needed for quality slash walls is unknown or at best based on highly uncertain empirical estimation. Quantifying how total and merchantable timber wood volume varies with width and height across slash walls will facilitate future planning and application of slash walls. In this study, we estimated wood volume per unit length (∼30.48 m) from total stem cross-sectional area in 40 randomly selected cut-through passages cut into 14 slash walls located at Cornell University’s Arnot Teaching and Research Forest (ATRF) in south-central New York. Within each passage we used Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) to identify individual stems and obtain cross-sectional surface area. We found that TLS derived stem diameters were highly consistent with manual stem diameter measurements for 10 selected wall passages (N = 308, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.933, RMSE = 1.881 cm). However, TLS tends to underestimate total cross-sectional area due to omission of small stem cross-sections (diameter < 5.08 cm). Cross-sections of small stems often have a low number of total points even when point density is high, especially when they are not facing the scanner. They are also more vulnerable to occlusion (i.e., lack of points due to blocking by other stems). TLS-based wood volume estimates were similar across both short and tall slash walls in the study with an average volume of 21.34 m<sup>3</sup>/30 m for short slash walls and 21.50 m<sup>3</sup>/30 m for tall slash walls, corresponding to 16.9 t dry biomass /30 m and 17.0 t dry biomass /30 m respectively. The small difference in woody volume was due to tall slash walls achieving additional height mainly through non-compacted small diameter crown and brush tops that have little woody volume. Average merchantable (diameter > 15.24 cm) and non-merchantable (diameter < 15.24 cm) timber fraction was 68.75 % and 31.35 % for short slash walls and 65.04 % and 34.96 % for tall slash walls. We further assessed slash wall height and width using Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) for eight other tall slash walls. We found TLS measurements are representative of whole slash wall height and width variability based on ALS measurements. Our results provide novel data and methodology to estimate the construction cost of slash walls which are critical for optimizing slash wall applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724005231\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724005231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating merchantable and non-merchantable wood volume in slash walls using terrestrial and airborne LiDAR
Slash walls are an effective forest management practice to prevent deer herbivory and promote forest regeneration following a timber harvest. However, the material cost, i.e. amount of wood material, needed for quality slash walls is unknown or at best based on highly uncertain empirical estimation. Quantifying how total and merchantable timber wood volume varies with width and height across slash walls will facilitate future planning and application of slash walls. In this study, we estimated wood volume per unit length (∼30.48 m) from total stem cross-sectional area in 40 randomly selected cut-through passages cut into 14 slash walls located at Cornell University’s Arnot Teaching and Research Forest (ATRF) in south-central New York. Within each passage we used Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) to identify individual stems and obtain cross-sectional surface area. We found that TLS derived stem diameters were highly consistent with manual stem diameter measurements for 10 selected wall passages (N = 308, R2 = 0.933, RMSE = 1.881 cm). However, TLS tends to underestimate total cross-sectional area due to omission of small stem cross-sections (diameter < 5.08 cm). Cross-sections of small stems often have a low number of total points even when point density is high, especially when they are not facing the scanner. They are also more vulnerable to occlusion (i.e., lack of points due to blocking by other stems). TLS-based wood volume estimates were similar across both short and tall slash walls in the study with an average volume of 21.34 m3/30 m for short slash walls and 21.50 m3/30 m for tall slash walls, corresponding to 16.9 t dry biomass /30 m and 17.0 t dry biomass /30 m respectively. The small difference in woody volume was due to tall slash walls achieving additional height mainly through non-compacted small diameter crown and brush tops that have little woody volume. Average merchantable (diameter > 15.24 cm) and non-merchantable (diameter < 15.24 cm) timber fraction was 68.75 % and 31.35 % for short slash walls and 65.04 % and 34.96 % for tall slash walls. We further assessed slash wall height and width using Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) for eight other tall slash walls. We found TLS measurements are representative of whole slash wall height and width variability based on ALS measurements. Our results provide novel data and methodology to estimate the construction cost of slash walls which are critical for optimizing slash wall applications.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.