脊髓损伤后重度抑郁的影响因素分析。

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Zhengjie Tang, Xing Yu
{"title":"脊髓损伤后重度抑郁的影响因素分析。","authors":"Zhengjie Tang, Xing Yu","doi":"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the risk factors of major depressive disorder (MDD) after spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with SCI in our hospital from February 2020 to February 2023 were selected as the study objects. According to the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score, patients with 36~75 points were included in the major depression group, and 0~35 points were included in the non-major depression group. The general sociological characteristics (age, gender, educational level, place of residence, family economic status, payment method of medical expenses, marital status) and disease-related characteristics (course of disease, cause of injury, neurological level of injury, type of injury, degree of pain) of all patients were collected, and the items with differences were selected for logistic regression analysis to analyze the risk factors for major depression in patients with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 216 patients were enrolled in our study, including 45 patients (18.98%) had moderate-to-severe depression and 175 patients (81.02%) had non-severe depression. Univariate analysis showed that gender (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 11.865, <i>P</i> < .001), course of disease (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 12.967, <i>P</i> < .001), family economic status (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 8.610, <i>P</i> = .003), educational level (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> =15.287, <i>P</i> < .001), neurological level of injury (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 9.013, <i>P</i> = .003) and pain level (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 16.673, <i>P</i> < .001) were statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender [odds ratio (OR) (95 % CI) = 3.986 (1.743~9.116), <i>P</i> = .001], course of disease [OR (95 % CI) = 4.033 (1.818~8.947), <i>P</i> = .001], family economic status [OR (95 % CI) = 3.136 (1.449~6.785), <i>P</i> = .004], educational level [OR (95 % CI) = 4.332 (1.998~9.388), <i>P</i> = .000], neurological level of injury [OR (95 % CI) = 2.848 (1.414~5.734), <i>P</i> = .003], and pain level [OR (95 % CI) = 5.767 (2.309~14.404), <i>P</i> < .001] were risk factors for major depressive disorder in SCI patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender, disease duration, family economic status, education level, level of nerve injury, and pain level may be the independent risk factors of MDD incidence in patients with spinal cord injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Influencing Factors of Major Depression After Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Zhengjie Tang, Xing Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the risk factors of major depressive disorder (MDD) after spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with SCI in our hospital from February 2020 to February 2023 were selected as the study objects. According to the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score, patients with 36~75 points were included in the major depression group, and 0~35 points were included in the non-major depression group. The general sociological characteristics (age, gender, educational level, place of residence, family economic status, payment method of medical expenses, marital status) and disease-related characteristics (course of disease, cause of injury, neurological level of injury, type of injury, degree of pain) of all patients were collected, and the items with differences were selected for logistic regression analysis to analyze the risk factors for major depression in patients with spinal cord injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 216 patients were enrolled in our study, including 45 patients (18.98%) had moderate-to-severe depression and 175 patients (81.02%) had non-severe depression. Univariate analysis showed that gender (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 11.865, <i>P</i> < .001), course of disease (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 12.967, <i>P</i> < .001), family economic status (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 8.610, <i>P</i> = .003), educational level (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> =15.287, <i>P</i> < .001), neurological level of injury (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 9.013, <i>P</i> = .003) and pain level (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i> = 16.673, <i>P</i> < .001) were statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender [odds ratio (OR) (95 % CI) = 3.986 (1.743~9.116), <i>P</i> = .001], course of disease [OR (95 % CI) = 4.033 (1.818~8.947), <i>P</i> = .001], family economic status [OR (95 % CI) = 3.136 (1.449~6.785), <i>P</i> = .004], educational level [OR (95 % CI) = 4.332 (1.998~9.388), <i>P</i> = .000], neurological level of injury [OR (95 % CI) = 2.848 (1.414~5.734), <i>P</i> = .003], and pain level [OR (95 % CI) = 5.767 (2.309~14.404), <i>P</i> < .001] were risk factors for major depressive disorder in SCI patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender, disease duration, family economic status, education level, level of nerve injury, and pain level may be the independent risk factors of MDD incidence in patients with spinal cord injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322723/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析脊髓损伤(SCI)后出现重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的风险因素:分析脊髓损伤(SCI)后重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的风险因素:选取 2020 年 2 月至 2023 年 2 月在我院就诊的 SCI 患者作为研究对象。根据汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分,36~75分为重度抑郁组,0~35分为非重度抑郁组。收集所有患者的一般社会学特征(年龄、性别、受教育程度、居住地、家庭经济状况、医疗费用支付方式、婚姻状况)和疾病相关特征(病程、致伤原因、神经损伤程度、损伤类型、疼痛程度),并选择存在差异的项目进行Logistic回归分析,以分析脊髓损伤患者重度抑郁的危险因素:研究共纳入 216 例患者,其中中重度抑郁症患者 45 例(18.98%),非重度抑郁症患者 175 例(81.02%)。单变量分析显示,性别(χ2 = 11.865,P < .001)、病程(χ2 = 12.967,P < .001)、家庭经济状况(χ2 = 8.610,P = .003)、受教育程度(χ2 = 15.287,P < .001)、神经损伤程度(χ2 = 9.013,P = .003)和疼痛程度(χ2 = 16.673,P < .001)在2组间差异有统计学意义。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,性别 [odds ratio (OR) (95 % CI) = 3.986 (1.743~9.116), P = .001], 病程 [OR (95 % CI) = 4.033 (1.818~8.947), P = .001], 家庭经济状况 [OR (95 % CI) = 3.136 (1.449~6.785), P = .004]、教育程度[OR(95 % CI)= 4.332 (1.998~9.388),P = .000]、神经损伤程度[OR(95 % CI)= 2.848 (1.414~5.734),P = .003]和疼痛程度[OR(95 % CI)= 5.767 (2.309~14.404),P < .001]是 SCI 患者出现重度抑郁障碍的风险因素:结论:性别、病程、家庭经济状况、教育程度、神经损伤程度和疼痛程度可能是脊髓损伤患者发生重性抑郁症的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Influencing Factors of Major Depression After Spinal Cord Injury.

Objective: To analyze the risk factors of major depressive disorder (MDD) after spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods: Patients with SCI in our hospital from February 2020 to February 2023 were selected as the study objects. According to the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score, patients with 36~75 points were included in the major depression group, and 0~35 points were included in the non-major depression group. The general sociological characteristics (age, gender, educational level, place of residence, family economic status, payment method of medical expenses, marital status) and disease-related characteristics (course of disease, cause of injury, neurological level of injury, type of injury, degree of pain) of all patients were collected, and the items with differences were selected for logistic regression analysis to analyze the risk factors for major depression in patients with spinal cord injury.

Results: Totally 216 patients were enrolled in our study, including 45 patients (18.98%) had moderate-to-severe depression and 175 patients (81.02%) had non-severe depression. Univariate analysis showed that gender (χ2 = 11.865, P < .001), course of disease (χ2 = 12.967, P < .001), family economic status (χ2 = 8.610, P = .003), educational level (χ2 =15.287, P < .001), neurological level of injury (χ2 = 9.013, P = .003) and pain level (χ2 = 16.673, P < .001) were statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender [odds ratio (OR) (95 % CI) = 3.986 (1.743~9.116), P = .001], course of disease [OR (95 % CI) = 4.033 (1.818~8.947), P = .001], family economic status [OR (95 % CI) = 3.136 (1.449~6.785), P = .004], educational level [OR (95 % CI) = 4.332 (1.998~9.388), P = .000], neurological level of injury [OR (95 % CI) = 2.848 (1.414~5.734), P = .003], and pain level [OR (95 % CI) = 5.767 (2.309~14.404), P < .001] were risk factors for major depressive disorder in SCI patients.

Conclusion: Gender, disease duration, family economic status, education level, level of nerve injury, and pain level may be the independent risk factors of MDD incidence in patients with spinal cord injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信