Venla Lehti, Valentina Kieseppä, Mika Gissler, Jaana Suvisaari, Niina Markkula
{"title":"移民使用心理疗法的情况:基于登记的纵向研究。","authors":"Venla Lehti, Valentina Kieseppä, Mika Gissler, Jaana Suvisaari, Niina Markkula","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migrants use less mental health services compared with non-migrant populations, but there is very little information on the use of long-term psychotherapy among migrants. Finnish register data allow for studying the whole migrant population in Finland and collecting data on all publicly supported rehabilitative psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is based on a sample of migrants (n=185 605) and Finnish-born controls (n=185 605). Participants who had received reimbursements for rehabilitative psychotherapy during 2007<b>-</b>2020 were identified from a register maintained by the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Cox regression analysis was used to study the effect of migrant status on the time until the start of therapy. Multinomial logistic regression was used to study the association between migrant status and the number of psychotherapy sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finnish-born participants received psychotherapy more often (n=7258) than migrants (n=1516). The adjusted HR for initiating psychotherapy among migrants compared with Finnish-born individuals was 0.27 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.28). Migrants from sub-Saharan Africa and Asia and recently arrived migrants were least likely to receive psychotherapy. Migrants were more likely to receive short treatment periods than Finnish-born controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower use of rehabilitative psychotherapy among migrant population in Finland is not likely to reflect lower need for treatment. More efforts are needed to promote equal access to psychotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"49-55"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychotherapy use among migrants: a register-based longitudinal study.\",\"authors\":\"Venla Lehti, Valentina Kieseppä, Mika Gissler, Jaana Suvisaari, Niina Markkula\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jech-2024-222330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migrants use less mental health services compared with non-migrant populations, but there is very little information on the use of long-term psychotherapy among migrants. Finnish register data allow for studying the whole migrant population in Finland and collecting data on all publicly supported rehabilitative psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is based on a sample of migrants (n=185 605) and Finnish-born controls (n=185 605). Participants who had received reimbursements for rehabilitative psychotherapy during 2007<b>-</b>2020 were identified from a register maintained by the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Cox regression analysis was used to study the effect of migrant status on the time until the start of therapy. Multinomial logistic regression was used to study the association between migrant status and the number of psychotherapy sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finnish-born participants received psychotherapy more often (n=7258) than migrants (n=1516). The adjusted HR for initiating psychotherapy among migrants compared with Finnish-born individuals was 0.27 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.28). Migrants from sub-Saharan Africa and Asia and recently arrived migrants were least likely to receive psychotherapy. Migrants were more likely to receive short treatment periods than Finnish-born controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower use of rehabilitative psychotherapy among migrant population in Finland is not likely to reflect lower need for treatment. More efforts are needed to promote equal access to psychotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"49-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-222330\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-222330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:与非移民人口相比,移民使用的心理健康服务较少,但有关移民使用长期心理治疗的信息却很少。芬兰的登记数据可用于研究芬兰的全部移民人口,并收集所有公共支持的康复性心理治疗的数据:本研究以移民(人数=185 605)和芬兰出生的对照组(人数=185 605)为样本。研究人员从芬兰社会保险局(Social Insurance Institution of Finland)的登记册中找到了在2007-2020年间接受过康复性心理治疗报销的参与者。Cox回归分析用于研究移民身份对治疗开始时间的影响。多项式逻辑回归用于研究移民身份与心理治疗次数之间的关系:芬兰出生的参与者接受心理治疗的次数(n=7258)多于移民(n=1516)。与芬兰出生的人相比,移民接受心理治疗的调整后HR值为0.27(95% CI为0.25至0.28)。来自撒哈拉以南非洲和亚洲的移民以及新近抵达的移民最不可能接受心理治疗。与芬兰出生的对照组相比,移民更有可能接受短期治疗:结论:芬兰移民接受康复性心理治疗的比例较低,这并不反映他们对治疗的需求较低。需要做出更多努力,促进平等获得心理治疗的机会。
Psychotherapy use among migrants: a register-based longitudinal study.
Background: Migrants use less mental health services compared with non-migrant populations, but there is very little information on the use of long-term psychotherapy among migrants. Finnish register data allow for studying the whole migrant population in Finland and collecting data on all publicly supported rehabilitative psychotherapy.
Methods: This study is based on a sample of migrants (n=185 605) and Finnish-born controls (n=185 605). Participants who had received reimbursements for rehabilitative psychotherapy during 2007-2020 were identified from a register maintained by the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Cox regression analysis was used to study the effect of migrant status on the time until the start of therapy. Multinomial logistic regression was used to study the association between migrant status and the number of psychotherapy sessions.
Results: Finnish-born participants received psychotherapy more often (n=7258) than migrants (n=1516). The adjusted HR for initiating psychotherapy among migrants compared with Finnish-born individuals was 0.27 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.28). Migrants from sub-Saharan Africa and Asia and recently arrived migrants were least likely to receive psychotherapy. Migrants were more likely to receive short treatment periods than Finnish-born controls.
Conclusion: Lower use of rehabilitative psychotherapy among migrant population in Finland is not likely to reflect lower need for treatment. More efforts are needed to promote equal access to psychotherapy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.