利用人工智能评估先天性腭裂伴或不伴唇裂儿童的咽喉能力。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Måns Cornefjord, Joel Bluhme, Andreas Jakobsson, Kristina Klintö, Anette Lohmander, Tofig Mamedov, Mia Stiernman, Rebecca Svensson, Magnus Becker
{"title":"利用人工智能评估先天性腭裂伴或不伴唇裂儿童的咽喉能力。","authors":"Måns Cornefjord, Joel Bluhme, Andreas Jakobsson, Kristina Klintö, Anette Lohmander, Tofig Mamedov, Mia Stiernman, Rebecca Svensson, Magnus Becker","doi":"10.1177/10556656241271646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Development of an AI tool to assess velopharyngeal competence (VPC) in children with cleft palate, with/without cleft lip.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Innovation of an AI tool using retrospective audio recordings and assessments of VPC.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two datasets were used. The first, named the SR dataset, included data from follow-up visits to Skåne University Hospital, Sweden. The second, named the SC + IC dataset, was a combined dataset (SC + IC dataset) with data from the Scandcleft randomized trials across five countries and an intercenter study performed at six Swedish CL/P centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>SR dataset included 153 recordings from 162 children, and SC + IC dataset included 308 recordings from 399 children. All recordings were from ages 5 or 10, with corresponding VPC assessments.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Development of two networks, a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a pre-trained CNN (VGGish). After initial testing using the SR dataset, the networks were re-tested using the SC + IC dataset and modified to improve performance.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Accuracy of the networks' VPC scores, with speech and language pathologistś scores seen as the true values. A three-point scale was used for VPC assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VGGish outperformed CNN, achieving 57.1% accuracy compared to 39.8%. Minor adjustments in data pre-processing and network characteristics improved accuracies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Network accuracies were too low for the networks to be useful alternatives for VPC assessment in clinical practice. Suggestions for future research with regards to study design and dataset optimization were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Artificial Intelligence for Assessment of Velopharyngeal Competence in Children Born With Cleft Palate With or Without Cleft Lip.\",\"authors\":\"Måns Cornefjord, Joel Bluhme, Andreas Jakobsson, Kristina Klintö, Anette Lohmander, Tofig Mamedov, Mia Stiernman, Rebecca Svensson, Magnus Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241271646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Development of an AI tool to assess velopharyngeal competence (VPC) in children with cleft palate, with/without cleft lip.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Innovation of an AI tool using retrospective audio recordings and assessments of VPC.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two datasets were used. The first, named the SR dataset, included data from follow-up visits to Skåne University Hospital, Sweden. The second, named the SC + IC dataset, was a combined dataset (SC + IC dataset) with data from the Scandcleft randomized trials across five countries and an intercenter study performed at six Swedish CL/P centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>SR dataset included 153 recordings from 162 children, and SC + IC dataset included 308 recordings from 399 children. All recordings were from ages 5 or 10, with corresponding VPC assessments.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Development of two networks, a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a pre-trained CNN (VGGish). After initial testing using the SR dataset, the networks were re-tested using the SC + IC dataset and modified to improve performance.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Accuracy of the networks' VPC scores, with speech and language pathologistś scores seen as the true values. A three-point scale was used for VPC assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VGGish outperformed CNN, achieving 57.1% accuracy compared to 39.8%. Minor adjustments in data pre-processing and network characteristics improved accuracies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Network accuracies were too low for the networks to be useful alternatives for VPC assessment in clinical practice. Suggestions for future research with regards to study design and dataset optimization were discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241271646\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241271646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:开发一种人工智能工具,用于评估腭裂儿童(伴有/不伴有唇裂)的咽发育能力(VPC):开发一种人工智能工具,用于评估伴有/不伴有唇裂的腭裂儿童的发音能力(VPC):设计:使用回顾性录音和 VPC 评估创新人工智能工具:使用两个数据集。第一个数据集名为 SR 数据集,包括瑞典斯科纳大学医院的随访数据。第二个数据集被命名为 SC + IC 数据集,是一个综合数据集(SC + IC 数据集),包括来自五个国家的 Scandcleft 随机试验的数据和在瑞典六个 CL/P 中心进行的中心间研究的数据:SR 数据集包括来自 162 名儿童的 153 份录音,SC + IC 数据集包括来自 399 名儿童的 308 份录音。所有记录均来自 5 岁或 10 岁儿童,并进行了相应的 VPC 评估:开发两个网络:一个卷积神经网络(CNN)和一个预训练 CNN(VGGish)。在使用 SR 数据集进行初步测试后,使用 SC + IC 数据集对网络进行重新测试,并对其进行修改以提高性能:网络VPC评分的准确性,以语言病理学家的评分为真实值。VPC 评估采用三分制:结果:VGGish 的表现优于 CNN,准确率为 57.1%,而 CNN 为 39.8%。对数据预处理和网络特性的微小调整提高了准确率:网络准确率太低,无法成为临床实践中 VPC 评估的有用替代方案。会上还讨论了有关研究设计和数据集优化的未来研究建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Artificial Intelligence for Assessment of Velopharyngeal Competence in Children Born With Cleft Palate With or Without Cleft Lip.

Objective: Development of an AI tool to assess velopharyngeal competence (VPC) in children with cleft palate, with/without cleft lip.

Design: Innovation of an AI tool using retrospective audio recordings and assessments of VPC.

Setting: Two datasets were used. The first, named the SR dataset, included data from follow-up visits to Skåne University Hospital, Sweden. The second, named the SC + IC dataset, was a combined dataset (SC + IC dataset) with data from the Scandcleft randomized trials across five countries and an intercenter study performed at six Swedish CL/P centers.

Participants: SR dataset included 153 recordings from 162 children, and SC + IC dataset included 308 recordings from 399 children. All recordings were from ages 5 or 10, with corresponding VPC assessments.

Interventions: Development of two networks, a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a pre-trained CNN (VGGish). After initial testing using the SR dataset, the networks were re-tested using the SC + IC dataset and modified to improve performance.

Main outcome measures: Accuracy of the networks' VPC scores, with speech and language pathologistś scores seen as the true values. A three-point scale was used for VPC assessments.

Results: VGGish outperformed CNN, achieving 57.1% accuracy compared to 39.8%. Minor adjustments in data pre-processing and network characteristics improved accuracies.

Conclusions: Network accuracies were too low for the networks to be useful alternatives for VPC assessment in clinical practice. Suggestions for future research with regards to study design and dataset optimization were discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信