减少医学影像科室对环境影响的方法:范围审查。

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"减少医学影像科室对环境影响的方法:范围审查。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Global warming stands as a paramount public health issue of our time, and it is fundamental to explore approaches to green medical imaging departments/(MID). This study aims to map the existing actions in the literature that promote sustainable development in MID towards the promotion of environmental impact reduction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following the JBI methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), this literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL to encompass studies published after 2013. Combinations of keywords and relevant terms related to environmental sustainability, recycling, medical waste, and greening radiology were applied for this review. Three independent reviewers screened abstracts, titles, and eligible full-text. Disagreement was solved through consensus.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>38 out of 4630 articles met all inclusion criteria, and four additional articles were identified and added through reference search. A third of the studies included were published after 2022, and most were conducted in developed countries (36/41). Articles focused on computed tomography (9/41), magnetic resonance imaging (6/41), interventional radiology (4/41), conventional radiography (4/41), ultrasound (2/41), mixed modalities (10/41), or not applicable to an imaging modality (6/41). Four principal categories were identified to decrease ecological footprint: energy consumption, waste management, justification and environmental pollution.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To minimise the environmental impact of MIDs raising awareness and promoting education is fundamental. Examinations must be justified adequately, energy consumption must be reduced, and waste management practices need to be implemented. Further studies are required to prioritise the most effective strategies, supporting decision-making among stakeholders.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Several strategies are already possible to implement to reduce the environmental impact of MIDs and improve the healthcare outcomes for patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001998/pdfft?md5=2bbbff9170f634c5b833b3ade4e48d9f&pid=1-s2.0-S1078817424001998-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to reduce medical imaging departments’ environmental impact: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Global warming stands as a paramount public health issue of our time, and it is fundamental to explore approaches to green medical imaging departments/(MID). This study aims to map the existing actions in the literature that promote sustainable development in MID towards the promotion of environmental impact reduction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following the JBI methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), this literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL to encompass studies published after 2013. Combinations of keywords and relevant terms related to environmental sustainability, recycling, medical waste, and greening radiology were applied for this review. Three independent reviewers screened abstracts, titles, and eligible full-text. Disagreement was solved through consensus.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>38 out of 4630 articles met all inclusion criteria, and four additional articles were identified and added through reference search. A third of the studies included were published after 2022, and most were conducted in developed countries (36/41). Articles focused on computed tomography (9/41), magnetic resonance imaging (6/41), interventional radiology (4/41), conventional radiography (4/41), ultrasound (2/41), mixed modalities (10/41), or not applicable to an imaging modality (6/41). Four principal categories were identified to decrease ecological footprint: energy consumption, waste management, justification and environmental pollution.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To minimise the environmental impact of MIDs raising awareness and promoting education is fundamental. Examinations must be justified adequately, energy consumption must be reduced, and waste management practices need to be implemented. Further studies are required to prioritise the most effective strategies, supporting decision-making among stakeholders.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Several strategies are already possible to implement to reduce the environmental impact of MIDs and improve the healthcare outcomes for patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001998/pdfft?md5=2bbbff9170f634c5b833b3ade4e48d9f&pid=1-s2.0-S1078817424001998-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:全球变暖是当代最重要的公共卫生问题,因此探索绿色医学影像科室(MID)的方法至关重要。本研究旨在对文献中现有的促进医学影像科可持续发展的行动进行梳理,以促进减少对环境的影响:方法:按照 JBI 方法和《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR),在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL 上进行文献检索,涵盖 2013 年之后发表的研究。本综述采用了与环境可持续性、回收利用、医疗废物和绿色放射学相关的关键词和相关术语组合。三位独立审稿人筛选了摘要、标题和符合要求的全文。结果:4630 篇文章中有 38 篇符合所有要求:在 4630 篇文章中,有 38 篇符合所有纳入标准,另有 4 篇文章通过参考文献搜索被发现并添加进来。三分之一的纳入研究发表于 2022 年之后,大部分研究在发达国家进行(36/41)。文章主要涉及计算机断层扫描(9/41)、磁共振成像(6/41)、介入放射学(4/41)、传统放射学(4/41)、超声(2/41)、混合模式(10/41)或不适用于某种成像模式(6/41)。为减少生态足迹,确定了四个主要类别:能源消耗、废物管理、正当理由和环境污染:结论:要最大限度地减少 MID 对环境的影响,提高认识和促进教育是根本。考试必须有充分的理由,必须减少能源消耗,必须实施废物管理措施。需要开展进一步研究,确定最有效战略的优先次序,支持利益相关者的决策:实践启示:有几种策略已经可以实施,以减少 MID 对环境的影响并改善患者的医疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approaches to reduce medical imaging departments’ environmental impact: A scoping review

Introduction

Global warming stands as a paramount public health issue of our time, and it is fundamental to explore approaches to green medical imaging departments/(MID). This study aims to map the existing actions in the literature that promote sustainable development in MID towards the promotion of environmental impact reduction.

Methods

Following the JBI methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), this literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL to encompass studies published after 2013. Combinations of keywords and relevant terms related to environmental sustainability, recycling, medical waste, and greening radiology were applied for this review. Three independent reviewers screened abstracts, titles, and eligible full-text. Disagreement was solved through consensus.

Results

38 out of 4630 articles met all inclusion criteria, and four additional articles were identified and added through reference search. A third of the studies included were published after 2022, and most were conducted in developed countries (36/41). Articles focused on computed tomography (9/41), magnetic resonance imaging (6/41), interventional radiology (4/41), conventional radiography (4/41), ultrasound (2/41), mixed modalities (10/41), or not applicable to an imaging modality (6/41). Four principal categories were identified to decrease ecological footprint: energy consumption, waste management, justification and environmental pollution.

Conclusion

To minimise the environmental impact of MIDs raising awareness and promoting education is fundamental. Examinations must be justified adequately, energy consumption must be reduced, and waste management practices need to be implemented. Further studies are required to prioritise the most effective strategies, supporting decision-making among stakeholders.

Implications for practice

Several strategies are already possible to implement to reduce the environmental impact of MIDs and improve the healthcare outcomes for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信