黄斑孔手术中的面朝下体位:系统回顾与个体参与者数据元分析

IF 13.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Raffaele Raimondi, Nikolaos Tzoumas, Steven Toh, Gurkaran S Sarohia, Mark R Phillips, Varun Chaudhary, David H Steel
{"title":"黄斑孔手术中的面朝下体位:系统回顾与个体参与者数据元分析","authors":"Raffaele Raimondi, Nikolaos Tzoumas, Steven Toh, Gurkaran S Sarohia, Mark R Phillips, Varun Chaudhary, David H Steel","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Topic: </strong>To assess the anatomical and visual effects of facedown positioning (FDP) advice in patients undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade for idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs), and to explore differential treatment effects by macular hole size and FDP duration.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The necessity and duration of FDP for FTMH closure remain contentious, with no consensus guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively registered systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing FDP to no FDP (nFDP) across the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and clinical trial registries from January 2000 to March 2023 (CRD42023395152). All adults with idiopathic FTMHs undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade were included. The main outcomes were primary macular hole closure and post-operative visual acuity at 6 months or nearest time point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8 eligible trials, 5 contributed IPD for 379 eyes and were included in our analysis. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for primary closure with FDP versus nFDP was 2.41 (95% CI 0.98 to 5.93, P = 0.06) [GRADE: Low], translating to a relative risk (RR) of 1.08 (1.00 to 1.11) and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 15. The FDP group exhibited a mean improvement in post-operative visual acuity of -0.08 logMAR (-0.13 to -0.02, P = 0.006) [GRADE: Low] compared to the nFDP group. Benefits were more certain in participants with larger holes of minimum linear diameter ≥ 400 μm: adjusted OR for closure ranged from 1.13 to 10.12 (P = 0.030) (NNT 12), with a mean visual acuity improvement of -0.18 to -0.01 logMAR (P = 0.022). Each additional day of FDP was associated with improved odds of anatomical success (adjusted OR 1.02 to 1.41, RR 1.00 to 1.02, P = 0.026) and visual acuity improvement (-0.02 logMAR, -0.03 to -0.01, P = 0.002), possibly plateauing at 3 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides low certainty evidence that FDP improves the anatomical and visual outcomes of macular hole surgery modestly and indicate that the effect may be more substantial for macular holes exceeding 400 μm. The findings support recommending FDP for patients with macular holes exceeding 400 μm pending further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facedown Positioning in Macular Hole Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Raffaele Raimondi, Nikolaos Tzoumas, Steven Toh, Gurkaran S Sarohia, Mark R Phillips, Varun Chaudhary, David H Steel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Topic: </strong>To assess the anatomical and visual effects of facedown positioning (FDP) advice in patients undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade for idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs), and to explore differential treatment effects by macular hole size and FDP duration.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The necessity and duration of FDP for FTMH closure remain contentious, with no consensus guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively registered systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing FDP to no FDP (nFDP) across the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and clinical trial registries from January 2000 to March 2023 (CRD42023395152). All adults with idiopathic FTMHs undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade were included. The main outcomes were primary macular hole closure and post-operative visual acuity at 6 months or nearest time point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8 eligible trials, 5 contributed IPD for 379 eyes and were included in our analysis. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for primary closure with FDP versus nFDP was 2.41 (95% CI 0.98 to 5.93, P = 0.06) [GRADE: Low], translating to a relative risk (RR) of 1.08 (1.00 to 1.11) and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 15. The FDP group exhibited a mean improvement in post-operative visual acuity of -0.08 logMAR (-0.13 to -0.02, P = 0.006) [GRADE: Low] compared to the nFDP group. Benefits were more certain in participants with larger holes of minimum linear diameter ≥ 400 μm: adjusted OR for closure ranged from 1.13 to 10.12 (P = 0.030) (NNT 12), with a mean visual acuity improvement of -0.18 to -0.01 logMAR (P = 0.022). Each additional day of FDP was associated with improved odds of anatomical success (adjusted OR 1.02 to 1.41, RR 1.00 to 1.02, P = 0.026) and visual acuity improvement (-0.02 logMAR, -0.03 to -0.01, P = 0.002), possibly plateauing at 3 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides low certainty evidence that FDP improves the anatomical and visual outcomes of macular hole surgery modestly and indicate that the effect may be more substantial for macular holes exceeding 400 μm. The findings support recommending FDP for patients with macular holes exceeding 400 μm pending further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.08.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主题目的:评估对特发性全厚黄斑孔(FTMHs)接受玻璃体切除术并进行气体填塞的患者进行面朝下定位(FDP)建议的解剖学和视觉效果,并探讨黄斑孔大小和FDP持续时间对治疗效果的不同影响:临床相关性:FTMH闭合时FDP的必要性和持续时间仍存在争议,目前尚无一致的指导原则:方法:2000年1月至2023年3月期间,在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库以及临床试验登记处(CRD42023395152)对比较FDP与无FDP(nFDP)的随机对照试验进行前瞻性系统回顾和个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析。所有接受玻璃体切除术和气体填塞术的特发性 FTMH 成人患者均被纳入研究范围。主要结果是原发性黄斑孔闭合和术后6个月或最近时间点的视力:在 8 项符合条件的试验中,有 5 项提供了 379 只眼睛的 IPD,并纳入了我们的分析。FDP 与 nFDP 相比,一次闭合的调整后比值比 (OR) 为 2.41(95% CI 0.98 至 5.93,P = 0.06)[GRADE:低],即相对风险 (RR) 为 1.08(1.00 至 1.11),治疗需要量 (NNT) 为 15。与 nFDP 组相比,FDP 组的术后视力平均提高了-0.08 logMAR(-0.13 至-0.02,P = 0.006)[GRADE:低]。对于最小线性直径≥ 400 μm的较大眼洞患者,其获益更为确定:调整后的闭合OR值从1.13到10.12不等(P = 0.030)(NNT 12),平均视力改善幅度为-0.18到-0.01 logMAR(P = 0.022)。FDP每增加一天,解剖成功的几率(调整后 OR 1.02 至 1.41,RR 1.00 至 1.02,P = 0.026)和视力改善的几率(-0.02 logMAR,-0.03 至 -0.01,P = 0.002)都会增加,可能在 3 天时达到峰值:本研究提供的低确定性证据表明,FDP 能适度改善黄斑孔手术的解剖和视力效果,并表明对超过 400 μm 的黄斑孔的效果可能更显著。研究结果支持建议对黄斑孔超过 400 μm 的患者进行 FDP,但有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facedown Positioning in Macular Hole Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

Topic: To assess the anatomical and visual effects of facedown positioning (FDP) advice in patients undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade for idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs), and to explore differential treatment effects by macular hole size and FDP duration.

Clinical relevance: The necessity and duration of FDP for FTMH closure remain contentious, with no consensus guidelines.

Methods: Prospectively registered systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing FDP to no FDP (nFDP) across the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and clinical trial registries from January 2000 to March 2023 (CRD42023395152). All adults with idiopathic FTMHs undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade were included. The main outcomes were primary macular hole closure and post-operative visual acuity at 6 months or nearest time point.

Results: Of 8 eligible trials, 5 contributed IPD for 379 eyes and were included in our analysis. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for primary closure with FDP versus nFDP was 2.41 (95% CI 0.98 to 5.93, P = 0.06) [GRADE: Low], translating to a relative risk (RR) of 1.08 (1.00 to 1.11) and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 15. The FDP group exhibited a mean improvement in post-operative visual acuity of -0.08 logMAR (-0.13 to -0.02, P = 0.006) [GRADE: Low] compared to the nFDP group. Benefits were more certain in participants with larger holes of minimum linear diameter ≥ 400 μm: adjusted OR for closure ranged from 1.13 to 10.12 (P = 0.030) (NNT 12), with a mean visual acuity improvement of -0.18 to -0.01 logMAR (P = 0.022). Each additional day of FDP was associated with improved odds of anatomical success (adjusted OR 1.02 to 1.41, RR 1.00 to 1.02, P = 0.026) and visual acuity improvement (-0.02 logMAR, -0.03 to -0.01, P = 0.002), possibly plateauing at 3 days.

Conclusion: This study provides low certainty evidence that FDP improves the anatomical and visual outcomes of macular hole surgery modestly and indicate that the effect may be more substantial for macular holes exceeding 400 μm. The findings support recommending FDP for patients with macular holes exceeding 400 μm pending further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信