癌症患者肌筋膜疼痛综合征:叙述性综述。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Naruaki Kawasaki, Hiroto Ishiki, Sayaka Arakawa, Eriko Satomi, Hiromichi Matsuoka, Hideaki Hasuo
{"title":"癌症患者肌筋膜疼痛综合征:叙述性综述。","authors":"Naruaki Kawasaki, Hiroto Ishiki, Sayaka Arakawa, Eriko Satomi, Hiromichi Matsuoka, Hideaki Hasuo","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a chronic musculoskeletal pain syndrome. The purpose of this review is to describe the epidemiological and treatment evidence and to address the future research agenda in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review of previous reports investigating the prevalence and treatment of MPS in the oncology field is presented. The target population is patients with cancer and cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There have been three prospective and two retrospective studies investigating the prevalence of MPS. MPS is as high as 38%-45% in patients with advanced or incurable cancer and 11.9%-44.8% in cancer survivors. A total of nine reports investigated the efficacy of the following interventions: trigger point injection (TPI), myofascial techniques and ischaemic compression. TPI has been reported to be effective in four observational studies. One randomised study reported the efficacy of myofascial techniques, but two randomised studies reported no added beneficial effects of it in breast cancer survivors. Two randomised studies investigated the efficacy of ischaemic compression, but the obtained results were contradictory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MPS is highly prevalent. We should know that non-cancer pain is also common in both patients with cancer and survivors. In treating such pain, careful physical examination is essential. Then, non-pharmacological treatment should be considered as well as pharmacotherapy. As evidence regarding MPS in the oncology field is scarce, further research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myofascial pain syndrome in patients with cancer: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Naruaki Kawasaki, Hiroto Ishiki, Sayaka Arakawa, Eriko Satomi, Hiromichi Matsuoka, Hideaki Hasuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2024-005064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a chronic musculoskeletal pain syndrome. The purpose of this review is to describe the epidemiological and treatment evidence and to address the future research agenda in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review of previous reports investigating the prevalence and treatment of MPS in the oncology field is presented. The target population is patients with cancer and cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There have been three prospective and two retrospective studies investigating the prevalence of MPS. MPS is as high as 38%-45% in patients with advanced or incurable cancer and 11.9%-44.8% in cancer survivors. A total of nine reports investigated the efficacy of the following interventions: trigger point injection (TPI), myofascial techniques and ischaemic compression. TPI has been reported to be effective in four observational studies. One randomised study reported the efficacy of myofascial techniques, but two randomised studies reported no added beneficial effects of it in breast cancer survivors. Two randomised studies investigated the efficacy of ischaemic compression, but the obtained results were contradictory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MPS is highly prevalent. We should know that non-cancer pain is also common in both patients with cancer and survivors. In treating such pain, careful physical examination is essential. Then, non-pharmacological treatment should be considered as well as pharmacotherapy. As evidence regarding MPS in the oncology field is scarce, further research is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是一种慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛综合征。本综述旨在描述流行病学和治疗证据,并探讨癌症患者的未来研究议程:方法:本文对以往调查肿瘤领域 MPS 患病率和治疗情况的报告进行了叙述性综述。研究对象为癌症患者和癌症幸存者:有三项前瞻性研究和两项回顾性研究对 MPS 的患病率进行了调查。在晚期或无法治愈的癌症患者中,MPS 的发病率高达 38%-45%,而在癌症幸存者中,MPS 的发病率为 11.9%-44.8%。共有九份报告调查了以下干预措施的疗效:触发点注射(TPI)、肌筋膜技术和缺血加压。有四项观察性研究报告称扳机点注射有效。一项随机研究报告了肌筋膜技术的疗效,但两项随机研究报告称,肌筋膜技术对乳腺癌幸存者没有额外的益处。两项随机研究调查了缺血性压迫的疗效,但所得结果相互矛盾:MPS 发病率很高。我们应该知道,非癌性疼痛在癌症患者和幸存者中也很常见。在治疗此类疼痛时,仔细的体格检查至关重要。然后,除了药物治疗外,还应考虑非药物治疗。由于在肿瘤学领域有关 MPS 的证据很少,因此有必要开展进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Myofascial pain syndrome in patients with cancer: a narrative review.

Purpose: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a chronic musculoskeletal pain syndrome. The purpose of this review is to describe the epidemiological and treatment evidence and to address the future research agenda in patients with cancer.

Methods: A narrative review of previous reports investigating the prevalence and treatment of MPS in the oncology field is presented. The target population is patients with cancer and cancer survivors.

Results: There have been three prospective and two retrospective studies investigating the prevalence of MPS. MPS is as high as 38%-45% in patients with advanced or incurable cancer and 11.9%-44.8% in cancer survivors. A total of nine reports investigated the efficacy of the following interventions: trigger point injection (TPI), myofascial techniques and ischaemic compression. TPI has been reported to be effective in four observational studies. One randomised study reported the efficacy of myofascial techniques, but two randomised studies reported no added beneficial effects of it in breast cancer survivors. Two randomised studies investigated the efficacy of ischaemic compression, but the obtained results were contradictory.

Conclusions: MPS is highly prevalent. We should know that non-cancer pain is also common in both patients with cancer and survivors. In treating such pain, careful physical examination is essential. Then, non-pharmacological treatment should be considered as well as pharmacotherapy. As evidence regarding MPS in the oncology field is scarce, further research is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信