生物补充剂对婴儿睡眠和安顿行为的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
M Matin, M Brockway, A Badejo, A Kouroupis, R Janke, E Keys
{"title":"生物补充剂对婴儿睡眠和安顿行为的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"M Matin, M Brockway, A Badejo, A Kouroupis, R Janke, E Keys","doi":"10.1163/18762891-bja00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microbiota changes throughout infancy and can be modified by biotic supplementation, which includes probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and post-biotics. Given the potential influence of the microbiome on infant sleep, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of biotic supplementation on sleep behaviours in full-term infants aged 0-12 months. In June 2023, we searched seven databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of biotic supplementation intervention studies using synonymous terms for 'infant' AND 'biotic' AND 'sleep' (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42022358822). Title/abstracts and the full texts were independently screened. Data on infant sleep and settling behaviour outcomes, reported adverse/side effects, and co-morbid conditions were extracted for analysis. Using the modified Cochrane Collaboration tool, two independent reviewers judged the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan5. Our search yielded 453 unique studies and 23 RCTs are included in this review. Probiotic supplementation was the most common biotic supplementation (provided in 53% of studies), while 28% and 19% offered prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation, respectively. Sleep duration was the most common (95%) reported outcome for probiotics. No significant differences were reported in sleep duration during the 1st to 4th week of probiotic supplementation. However, in the 5th week of probiotic supplementation, infants who received placebo slept significantly longer (MD = -35.17 min, 95% CI [-69.72, -0.62]), suggesting a borderline significance that is clinically relevant. There were limited studies and timeframe alignment to analyse prebiotics, synbiotics, post-biotics, and para-probiotics effects on infant sleep duration. The study suggests probiotic supplementation does not increase infant sleep duration within the first 4 postpartum weeks and may contribute to reduced sleep duration in the fifth week. Limited studies were available to assess the effects of biotic supplementation over the first 12 postpartum months. Future research should assess the full range of sleep behaviours, infant feeding type, and microbiome.</p>","PeriodicalId":8834,"journal":{"name":"Beneficial microbes","volume":" ","pages":"609-641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of biotic supplementation on infant sleep and settling behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M Matin, M Brockway, A Badejo, A Kouroupis, R Janke, E Keys\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18762891-bja00034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Microbiota changes throughout infancy and can be modified by biotic supplementation, which includes probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and post-biotics. Given the potential influence of the microbiome on infant sleep, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of biotic supplementation on sleep behaviours in full-term infants aged 0-12 months. In June 2023, we searched seven databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of biotic supplementation intervention studies using synonymous terms for 'infant' AND 'biotic' AND 'sleep' (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42022358822). Title/abstracts and the full texts were independently screened. Data on infant sleep and settling behaviour outcomes, reported adverse/side effects, and co-morbid conditions were extracted for analysis. Using the modified Cochrane Collaboration tool, two independent reviewers judged the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan5. Our search yielded 453 unique studies and 23 RCTs are included in this review. Probiotic supplementation was the most common biotic supplementation (provided in 53% of studies), while 28% and 19% offered prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation, respectively. Sleep duration was the most common (95%) reported outcome for probiotics. No significant differences were reported in sleep duration during the 1st to 4th week of probiotic supplementation. However, in the 5th week of probiotic supplementation, infants who received placebo slept significantly longer (MD = -35.17 min, 95% CI [-69.72, -0.62]), suggesting a borderline significance that is clinically relevant. There were limited studies and timeframe alignment to analyse prebiotics, synbiotics, post-biotics, and para-probiotics effects on infant sleep duration. The study suggests probiotic supplementation does not increase infant sleep duration within the first 4 postpartum weeks and may contribute to reduced sleep duration in the fifth week. Limited studies were available to assess the effects of biotic supplementation over the first 12 postpartum months. Future research should assess the full range of sleep behaviours, infant feeding type, and microbiome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beneficial microbes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"609-641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beneficial microbes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-bja00034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beneficial microbes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-bja00034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微生物群在整个婴儿期都会发生变化,可通过补充生物制剂(包括益生菌、益生元、合成益生菌和后生物制剂)来改变。鉴于微生物群对婴儿睡眠的潜在影响,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定补充生物制剂对 0-12 个月足月儿睡眠行为的影响。2023 年 6 月,我们使用 "婴儿"、"生物 "和 "睡眠"(PROSPERO 注册 ID:CRD42022358822)的同义词搜索了七个数据库中有关生物补充剂干预研究的随机对照试验 (RCT)。对标题/摘要和全文进行了独立筛选。提取有关婴儿睡眠和安顿行为结果、报告的不良/副作用以及并发症的数据进行分析。两名独立审稿人使用修改后的 Cochrane 协作工具判断偏倚风险。使用 RevMan5 进行元分析。我们的搜索结果产生了 453 项独特的研究,23 项 RCT 纳入了本综述。益生菌补充剂是最常见的生物补充剂(53% 的研究提供了益生菌补充剂),分别有 28% 和 19% 的研究提供了益生菌和合成益生菌补充剂。睡眠时间是益生菌最常见(95%)的报告结果。在补充益生菌的第 1 周至第 4 周,睡眠时间没有明显差异。然而,在补充益生菌的第 5 周,服用安慰剂的婴儿睡眠时间明显更长(MD = -35.17分钟,95% CI [-69.72, -0.62]),这表明存在临床相关的边缘意义。分析益生菌、合成益生菌、后益生菌和辅助益生菌对婴儿睡眠时间的影响的研究和时间范围有限。研究表明,补充益生菌不会增加产后前四周内婴儿的睡眠时间,并可能导致第五周睡眠时间缩短。评估产后 12 个月内补充益生菌效果的研究有限。未来的研究应全面评估睡眠行为、婴儿喂养类型和微生物组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of biotic supplementation on infant sleep and settling behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Microbiota changes throughout infancy and can be modified by biotic supplementation, which includes probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and post-biotics. Given the potential influence of the microbiome on infant sleep, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of biotic supplementation on sleep behaviours in full-term infants aged 0-12 months. In June 2023, we searched seven databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of biotic supplementation intervention studies using synonymous terms for 'infant' AND 'biotic' AND 'sleep' (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42022358822). Title/abstracts and the full texts were independently screened. Data on infant sleep and settling behaviour outcomes, reported adverse/side effects, and co-morbid conditions were extracted for analysis. Using the modified Cochrane Collaboration tool, two independent reviewers judged the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan5. Our search yielded 453 unique studies and 23 RCTs are included in this review. Probiotic supplementation was the most common biotic supplementation (provided in 53% of studies), while 28% and 19% offered prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation, respectively. Sleep duration was the most common (95%) reported outcome for probiotics. No significant differences were reported in sleep duration during the 1st to 4th week of probiotic supplementation. However, in the 5th week of probiotic supplementation, infants who received placebo slept significantly longer (MD = -35.17 min, 95% CI [-69.72, -0.62]), suggesting a borderline significance that is clinically relevant. There were limited studies and timeframe alignment to analyse prebiotics, synbiotics, post-biotics, and para-probiotics effects on infant sleep duration. The study suggests probiotic supplementation does not increase infant sleep duration within the first 4 postpartum weeks and may contribute to reduced sleep duration in the fifth week. Limited studies were available to assess the effects of biotic supplementation over the first 12 postpartum months. Future research should assess the full range of sleep behaviours, infant feeding type, and microbiome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Beneficial microbes
Beneficial microbes MICROBIOLOGY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Beneficial Microbes is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with a specific area of focus: the promotion of the science of microbes beneficial to the health and wellbeing of man and animal. The journal contains original research papers and critical reviews in all areas dealing with beneficial microbes in both the small and large intestine, together with opinions, a calendar of forthcoming beneficial microbes-related events and book reviews. The journal takes a multidisciplinary approach and focuses on a broad spectrum of issues, including safety aspects of pro- & prebiotics, regulatory aspects, mechanisms of action, health benefits for the host, optimal production processes, screening methods, (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics, host and bacterial physiology, application, and role in health and disease in man and animal. Beneficial Microbes is intended to serve the needs of researchers and professionals from the scientific community and industry, as well as those of policy makers and regulators. The journal will have five major sections: * Food, nutrition and health * Animal nutrition * Processing and application * Regulatory & safety aspects * Medical & health applications In these sections, topics dealt with by Beneficial Microbes include: * Worldwide safety and regulatory issues * Human and animal nutrition and health effects * Latest discoveries in mechanistic studies and screening methods to unravel mode of action * Host physiology related to allergy, inflammation, obesity, etc. * Trends in application of (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics * New developments in how processing optimizes pro- & prebiotics for application * Bacterial physiology related to health benefits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信