早期阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍诊断的革命:深度学习核磁共振成像荟萃分析。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788657
Li-Xue Wang, Yi-Zhe Wang, Chen-Guang Han, Lei Zhao, Li He, Jie Li
{"title":"早期阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍诊断的革命:深度学习核磁共振成像荟萃分析。","authors":"Li-Xue Wang, Yi-Zhe Wang, Chen-Guang Han, Lei Zhao, Li He, Jie Li","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains a significant challenge in neurology, with conventional methods often limited by subjectivity and variability in interpretation. Integrating deep learning with artificial intelligence (AI) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis emerges as a transformative approach, offering the potential for unbiased, highly accurate diagnostic insights.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> A meta-analysis was designed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning of MRI images on AD and MCI models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A meta-analysis was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning. Subsequently, methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist. Diagnostic measures, including sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were analyzed, alongside subgroup analyses for T1-weighted and non-T1-weighted MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 18 eligible studies were identified. The Spearman correlation coefficient was -0.6506. Meta-analysis showed that the combined sensitivity and specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.84, 0.86, 6.0, 0.19, and 32, respectively. The AUROC was 0.92. The quiescent point of hierarchical summary of receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) was 3.463. Notably, the images of 12 studies were acquired by T1-weighted MRI alone, and those of the other 6 were gathered by non-T1-weighted MRI alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Overall, deep learning of MRI for the diagnosis of AD and MCI showed good sensitivity and specificity and contributed to improving diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"82 8","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revolutionizing early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment diagnosis: a deep learning MRI meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Li-Xue Wang, Yi-Zhe Wang, Chen-Guang Han, Lei Zhao, Li He, Jie Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1788657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains a significant challenge in neurology, with conventional methods often limited by subjectivity and variability in interpretation. Integrating deep learning with artificial intelligence (AI) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis emerges as a transformative approach, offering the potential for unbiased, highly accurate diagnostic insights.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> A meta-analysis was designed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning of MRI images on AD and MCI models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A meta-analysis was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning. Subsequently, methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist. Diagnostic measures, including sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were analyzed, alongside subgroup analyses for T1-weighted and non-T1-weighted MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 18 eligible studies were identified. The Spearman correlation coefficient was -0.6506. Meta-analysis showed that the combined sensitivity and specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.84, 0.86, 6.0, 0.19, and 32, respectively. The AUROC was 0.92. The quiescent point of hierarchical summary of receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) was 3.463. Notably, the images of 12 studies were acquired by T1-weighted MRI alone, and those of the other 6 were gathered by non-T1-weighted MRI alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Overall, deep learning of MRI for the diagnosis of AD and MCI showed good sensitivity and specificity and contributed to improving diagnostic accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"82 8\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500276/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788657\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的早期诊断仍然是神经病学的重大挑战,传统方法往往受限于解释的主观性和可变性。将深度学习与人工智能(AI)整合到磁共振成像(MRI)分析中是一种变革性的方法,有可能提供无偏见、高度准确的诊断见解:我们设计了一项荟萃分析,以分析 MRI 图像深度学习对 AD 和 MCI 模型的诊断准确性:按照系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了一项荟萃分析,重点关注深度学习的诊断准确性。随后,使用 QUADAS-2 核对表对方法学质量进行了评估。分析了诊断指标,包括灵敏度、特异性、似然比、诊断几率比例和接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC),并对T1加权和非T1加权磁共振成像进行了亚组分析:结果:共确定了 18 项符合条件的研究。斯皮尔曼相关系数为-0.6506。元分析显示,综合敏感性和特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断几率比分别为 0.84、0.86、6.0、0.19 和 32。AUROC为0.92。分层汇总接收者操作特征(HSROC)的静点为 3.463。值得注意的是,12 项研究的图像是单独通过 T1 加权磁共振成像获得的,而另外 6 项研究的图像是单独通过非 T1 加权磁共振成像收集的:总的来说,磁共振成像的深度学习在诊断AD和MCI方面表现出良好的灵敏度和特异性,有助于提高诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revolutionizing early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment diagnosis: a deep learning MRI meta-analysis.

Background:  The early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains a significant challenge in neurology, with conventional methods often limited by subjectivity and variability in interpretation. Integrating deep learning with artificial intelligence (AI) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis emerges as a transformative approach, offering the potential for unbiased, highly accurate diagnostic insights.

Objective:  A meta-analysis was designed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning of MRI images on AD and MCI models.

Methods:  A meta-analysis was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning. Subsequently, methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 checklist. Diagnostic measures, including sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were analyzed, alongside subgroup analyses for T1-weighted and non-T1-weighted MRI.

Results:  A total of 18 eligible studies were identified. The Spearman correlation coefficient was -0.6506. Meta-analysis showed that the combined sensitivity and specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.84, 0.86, 6.0, 0.19, and 32, respectively. The AUROC was 0.92. The quiescent point of hierarchical summary of receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) was 3.463. Notably, the images of 12 studies were acquired by T1-weighted MRI alone, and those of the other 6 were gathered by non-T1-weighted MRI alone.

Conclusion:  Overall, deep learning of MRI for the diagnosis of AD and MCI showed good sensitivity and specificity and contributed to improving diagnostic accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信