Roberta Südy , John Diaper , Davide Bizzotto , Rafaelle Dellàca , Ferenc Petak , Walid Habre , Andre Dos Santos Rocha
{"title":"急性呼吸窘迫综合征实验模型中的可变呼气末正压:一种先进的通气模式","authors":"Roberta Südy , John Diaper , Davide Bizzotto , Rafaelle Dellàca , Ferenc Petak , Walid Habre , Andre Dos Santos Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Introducing variability in tidal volume, ventilatory frequency, or both is beneficial during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We investigated whether applying cycle-by-cycle variability in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) exerts beneficial effect on lung function in a model of ARDS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Rabbits with lung injury were randomly allocated to receive mechanical ventilation for 6 h by applying a pressure-controlled mode with constant PEEP of 7 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PC group: <em>n</em>=6) or variable PEEP (VEEP) with a coefficient of variation of 21.4%, range 4–10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PC-VEEP group; <em>n</em>=6). Lung oxygenation index (<em>P</em>a<span>o</span><sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) after 6 h of ventilation (H6) was the primary outcome and respiratory mechanics, lung volume, intrapulmonary shunt, and lung inflammatory markers were secondary outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After lung injury, both groups presented moderate-to-severe ARDS (<em>P</em>a<span>o</span><sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> <27 kPa). The <em>P</em>a<span>o</span><sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> was significantly higher in the PC-VEEP group than in the PC group at H6 (12.3 [<span>sd</span> 3.5] <em>vs</em> 19.2 [7.2] kPa, <em>P</em>=0.013) and a lower arterial partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> at 1–3 h (<em>P</em><0.02). The ventilation-induced increases in airway resistance and tissue elastance were prevented by PC-VEEP. There was no evidence for a difference in minute volume, driving pressure, end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub>, lung volumes, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, and cytokines between the ventilation modes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Prolonged mechanical ventilation with cycle-by-cycle VEEP prevents deterioration in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in a model of ARDS, suggesting the benefit of this novel ventilation strategy to optimise gas exchange without increasing driving pressure and lung overdistension.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000467/pdfft?md5=bb75ea3ad3c8a7e3b54a06862b85ba1d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variable positive end-expiratory pressure in an experimental model of acute respiratory distress syndrome: an advanced ventilation modality\",\"authors\":\"Roberta Südy , John Diaper , Davide Bizzotto , Rafaelle Dellàca , Ferenc Petak , Walid Habre , Andre Dos Santos Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Introducing variability in tidal volume, ventilatory frequency, or both is beneficial during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We investigated whether applying cycle-by-cycle variability in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) exerts beneficial effect on lung function in a model of ARDS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Rabbits with lung injury were randomly allocated to receive mechanical ventilation for 6 h by applying a pressure-controlled mode with constant PEEP of 7 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PC group: <em>n</em>=6) or variable PEEP (VEEP) with a coefficient of variation of 21.4%, range 4–10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PC-VEEP group; <em>n</em>=6). Lung oxygenation index (<em>P</em>a<span>o</span><sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) after 6 h of ventilation (H6) was the primary outcome and respiratory mechanics, lung volume, intrapulmonary shunt, and lung inflammatory markers were secondary outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After lung injury, both groups presented moderate-to-severe ARDS (<em>P</em>a<span>o</span><sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> <27 kPa). The <em>P</em>a<span>o</span><sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> was significantly higher in the PC-VEEP group than in the PC group at H6 (12.3 [<span>sd</span> 3.5] <em>vs</em> 19.2 [7.2] kPa, <em>P</em>=0.013) and a lower arterial partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> at 1–3 h (<em>P</em><0.02). The ventilation-induced increases in airway resistance and tissue elastance were prevented by PC-VEEP. There was no evidence for a difference in minute volume, driving pressure, end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub>, lung volumes, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, and cytokines between the ventilation modes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Prolonged mechanical ventilation with cycle-by-cycle VEEP prevents deterioration in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in a model of ARDS, suggesting the benefit of this novel ventilation strategy to optimise gas exchange without increasing driving pressure and lung overdistension.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJA open\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000467/pdfft?md5=bb75ea3ad3c8a7e3b54a06862b85ba1d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000467-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJA open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的机械通气过程中引入潮气量、通气频率或两者的可变性是有益的。我们研究了在 ARDS 模型中逐个周期改变呼气末正压(PEEP)是否会对肺功能产生有益影响。方法将肺损伤的兔子随机分配到压力控制模式下接受机械通气 6 小时,PEEP 恒定为 7 cm H2O(PC 组:n=6)或变异系数为 21.4%、范围为 4-10 cm H2O 的可变 PEEP(VEEP)(PC-VEEP 组;n=6)。通气 6 小时(H6)后的肺氧合指数(Pao2/FiO2)为主要结果,呼吸力学、肺容积、肺内分流和肺部炎症指标为次要结果。在 H6 时,PC-VEEP 组的 Pao2/FiO2 明显高于 PC 组(12.3 [sd 3.5] vs 19.2 [7.2] kPa,P=0.013),且在 1-3 h 时动脉二氧化碳分压较低(P<0.02)。PC-VEEP 阻止了通气引起的气道阻力和组织弹性的增加。结论在 ARDS 模型中,通过逐周期 VEEP 延长机械通气可防止气体交换和呼吸力学的恶化,这表明这种新型通气策略可在不增加驱动压力和肺过度张力的情况下优化气体交换。
Variable positive end-expiratory pressure in an experimental model of acute respiratory distress syndrome: an advanced ventilation modality
Background
Introducing variability in tidal volume, ventilatory frequency, or both is beneficial during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We investigated whether applying cycle-by-cycle variability in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) exerts beneficial effect on lung function in a model of ARDS.
Methods
Rabbits with lung injury were randomly allocated to receive mechanical ventilation for 6 h by applying a pressure-controlled mode with constant PEEP of 7 cm H2O (PC group: n=6) or variable PEEP (VEEP) with a coefficient of variation of 21.4%, range 4–10 cm H2O (PC-VEEP group; n=6). Lung oxygenation index (Pao2/FiO2) after 6 h of ventilation (H6) was the primary outcome and respiratory mechanics, lung volume, intrapulmonary shunt, and lung inflammatory markers were secondary outcomes.
Results
After lung injury, both groups presented moderate-to-severe ARDS (Pao2/FiO2 <27 kPa). The Pao2/FiO2 was significantly higher in the PC-VEEP group than in the PC group at H6 (12.3 [sd 3.5] vs 19.2 [7.2] kPa, P=0.013) and a lower arterial partial pressure of CO2 at 1–3 h (P<0.02). The ventilation-induced increases in airway resistance and tissue elastance were prevented by PC-VEEP. There was no evidence for a difference in minute volume, driving pressure, end-tidal CO2, lung volumes, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, and cytokines between the ventilation modes.
Conclusions
Prolonged mechanical ventilation with cycle-by-cycle VEEP prevents deterioration in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in a model of ARDS, suggesting the benefit of this novel ventilation strategy to optimise gas exchange without increasing driving pressure and lung overdistension.