K. Colton Flynn , Douglas R. Smith , Trey O. Lee , Doris Laguer-Martinez , Shengfang Ma , Yuting Zhou
{"title":"通过植被指数敏感性分析评估玉米(Zea mays L.)管理措施","authors":"K. Colton Flynn , Douglas R. Smith , Trey O. Lee , Doris Laguer-Martinez , Shengfang Ma , Yuting Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conservation agriculture and sustainable agronomic principles include several management practices such as cover cropping, no-till, and alternative fertilization rates. Each of these practices can result in changes among agricultural productivity, sustainability for future farming, and protections for the environment. These management practices are important concepts that can be applied in the production of maize (<em>Zea mays L</em>., corn). The aim of this three-year study (2018–2020) was to compare maize health across two fields located in Riesel, TX under varying management approaches and precipitation conditions. The first field utilized ‘business as usual’ operations characterized by the implementation of tillage, fertilization at a maximum rate (10.06 Mg/ha), and no cover crops. The second field utilized ‘aspirational’ cultivation techniques categorized by no tillage, cover crops, and an alternative method for rate of fertilization. Each field was subject to satellite-based remote sensing methods incorporating Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), and Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE). Indices were subject to sensitivity analyses to determine the most sensitive index for maize under various managements and precipitation conditions. The most sensitive index (EVI) served as a proxy for time series analysis for maize health under the varying managements and rainfall conditions. The results suggest improvements to maize health are experienced over time when aspirational managements are employed, even though business as usual management resulted in higher yields. However, studies with greater duration could point to these perceived benefits over a long-term implementation. Nevertheless, productivity comparisons considering amount of input (i.e. fertilizer) suggests an increase in efficiency each year for the aspirational management. These findings suggest factors such as improved soil health from implementation of no-till and cover crops contribute to field health, efficiencies, and resiliency across varying precipitation conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 106266"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724002678/pdfft?md5=a3894f8864e48a6c3e700fa3d6619a82&pid=1-s2.0-S0167198724002678-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating maize (Zea mays L.) management practices implementing sensitivity analysis of vegetation indices\",\"authors\":\"K. Colton Flynn , Douglas R. Smith , Trey O. Lee , Doris Laguer-Martinez , Shengfang Ma , Yuting Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2024.106266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Conservation agriculture and sustainable agronomic principles include several management practices such as cover cropping, no-till, and alternative fertilization rates. Each of these practices can result in changes among agricultural productivity, sustainability for future farming, and protections for the environment. These management practices are important concepts that can be applied in the production of maize (<em>Zea mays L</em>., corn). The aim of this three-year study (2018–2020) was to compare maize health across two fields located in Riesel, TX under varying management approaches and precipitation conditions. The first field utilized ‘business as usual’ operations characterized by the implementation of tillage, fertilization at a maximum rate (10.06 Mg/ha), and no cover crops. The second field utilized ‘aspirational’ cultivation techniques categorized by no tillage, cover crops, and an alternative method for rate of fertilization. Each field was subject to satellite-based remote sensing methods incorporating Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), and Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE). Indices were subject to sensitivity analyses to determine the most sensitive index for maize under various managements and precipitation conditions. The most sensitive index (EVI) served as a proxy for time series analysis for maize health under the varying managements and rainfall conditions. The results suggest improvements to maize health are experienced over time when aspirational managements are employed, even though business as usual management resulted in higher yields. However, studies with greater duration could point to these perceived benefits over a long-term implementation. Nevertheless, productivity comparisons considering amount of input (i.e. fertilizer) suggests an increase in efficiency each year for the aspirational management. These findings suggest factors such as improved soil health from implementation of no-till and cover crops contribute to field health, efficiencies, and resiliency across varying precipitation conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"244 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724002678/pdfft?md5=a3894f8864e48a6c3e700fa3d6619a82&pid=1-s2.0-S0167198724002678-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724002678\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724002678","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating maize (Zea mays L.) management practices implementing sensitivity analysis of vegetation indices
Conservation agriculture and sustainable agronomic principles include several management practices such as cover cropping, no-till, and alternative fertilization rates. Each of these practices can result in changes among agricultural productivity, sustainability for future farming, and protections for the environment. These management practices are important concepts that can be applied in the production of maize (Zea mays L., corn). The aim of this three-year study (2018–2020) was to compare maize health across two fields located in Riesel, TX under varying management approaches and precipitation conditions. The first field utilized ‘business as usual’ operations characterized by the implementation of tillage, fertilization at a maximum rate (10.06 Mg/ha), and no cover crops. The second field utilized ‘aspirational’ cultivation techniques categorized by no tillage, cover crops, and an alternative method for rate of fertilization. Each field was subject to satellite-based remote sensing methods incorporating Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), and Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE). Indices were subject to sensitivity analyses to determine the most sensitive index for maize under various managements and precipitation conditions. The most sensitive index (EVI) served as a proxy for time series analysis for maize health under the varying managements and rainfall conditions. The results suggest improvements to maize health are experienced over time when aspirational managements are employed, even though business as usual management resulted in higher yields. However, studies with greater duration could point to these perceived benefits over a long-term implementation. Nevertheless, productivity comparisons considering amount of input (i.e. fertilizer) suggests an increase in efficiency each year for the aspirational management. These findings suggest factors such as improved soil health from implementation of no-till and cover crops contribute to field health, efficiencies, and resiliency across varying precipitation conditions.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.