ENHANCE:抗精神病治疗效果不佳的精神分裂症患者辅助皮马凡色林治疗的 3 期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

Schizophrenia bulletin open Pub Date : 2022-01-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac006
Dragana Bugarski-Kirola, Istvan Bitter, I-Yuan Liu, Brandon Abbs, Srdjan Stankovic
{"title":"ENHANCE:抗精神病治疗效果不佳的精神分裂症患者辅助皮马凡色林治疗的 3 期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。","authors":"Dragana Bugarski-Kirola, Istvan Bitter, I-Yuan Liu, Brandon Abbs, Srdjan Stankovic","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inadequate response to antipsychotic treatment is common in patients with schizophrenia. This study evaluated pimavanserin, a 5-HT <sub><b>2A</b></sub> receptor inverse agonist/antagonist, as adjunctive treatment in patients with inadequate response. This was a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study conducted in North America and Europe. Adult outpatients with schizophrenia and inadequate response to current antipsychotic were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score ≥65 and ≤110 and retrospective antipsychotic treatment stability of 8 weeks. Pimavanserin 20 mg/day or placebo added to ongoing antipsychotic was tested in a flexible-dose paradigm with dose adjustments allowed during the first 3 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint, PANSS total score change from baseline to week 6, was not met, although improvement was greater with pimavanserin than placebo (LS mean difference: -2.1, [95% CI: -4.5, 0.4]; <i>P</i> = .094). As a hierarchical testing procedure was used, additional efficacy analyses were exploratory. Clear separation from placebo was observed with pimavanserin at week 6 for the PANSS Negative Symptoms subscale (LS mean difference: -0.7, [95% CI: -1.5, 0.0]) and Marder Negative Symptom Factor score (-0.9, [-1.7, -0.1]). Analysis of European sites (81.5% of patients) revealed a difference for pimavanserin versus placebo on PANSS total score (LS mean difference: -3.1, [95% CI: -5.8, -0.4]) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score (-0.2, [-0.4, -0.0]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 39.9% with pimavanserin and 36.4% with placebo. Although statistical significance for the primary endpoint was not met, a trend toward improvement in negative symptoms was observed with pimavanserin, warranting further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":94380,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","volume":"3 1","pages":"sgac006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11205884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ENHANCE: Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Adjunctive Pimavanserin for Schizophrenia in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Antipsychotic Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Dragana Bugarski-Kirola, Istvan Bitter, I-Yuan Liu, Brandon Abbs, Srdjan Stankovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inadequate response to antipsychotic treatment is common in patients with schizophrenia. This study evaluated pimavanserin, a 5-HT <sub><b>2A</b></sub> receptor inverse agonist/antagonist, as adjunctive treatment in patients with inadequate response. This was a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study conducted in North America and Europe. Adult outpatients with schizophrenia and inadequate response to current antipsychotic were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score ≥65 and ≤110 and retrospective antipsychotic treatment stability of 8 weeks. Pimavanserin 20 mg/day or placebo added to ongoing antipsychotic was tested in a flexible-dose paradigm with dose adjustments allowed during the first 3 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint, PANSS total score change from baseline to week 6, was not met, although improvement was greater with pimavanserin than placebo (LS mean difference: -2.1, [95% CI: -4.5, 0.4]; <i>P</i> = .094). As a hierarchical testing procedure was used, additional efficacy analyses were exploratory. Clear separation from placebo was observed with pimavanserin at week 6 for the PANSS Negative Symptoms subscale (LS mean difference: -0.7, [95% CI: -1.5, 0.0]) and Marder Negative Symptom Factor score (-0.9, [-1.7, -0.1]). Analysis of European sites (81.5% of patients) revealed a difference for pimavanserin versus placebo on PANSS total score (LS mean difference: -3.1, [95% CI: -5.8, -0.4]) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score (-0.2, [-0.4, -0.0]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 39.9% with pimavanserin and 36.4% with placebo. Although statistical significance for the primary endpoint was not met, a trend toward improvement in negative symptoms was observed with pimavanserin, warranting further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia bulletin open\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"sgac006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11205884/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia bulletin open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神分裂症患者对抗精神病治疗反应不充分的情况很常见。本研究评估了匹马凡色林(一种 5-HT 2A 受体逆向激动剂/拮抗剂)作为辅助治疗药物对反应不充分患者的疗效。这是一项在北美和欧洲进行的为期 6 周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。研究对象为患有精神分裂症且对目前的抗精神病药物反应不足的成人门诊患者。纳入标准包括阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)总分≥65分和≤110分,以及回顾性抗精神病药物治疗稳定性达8周。皮马万色林 20 毫克/天或安慰剂添加到正在服用的抗精神病药物中,以灵活剂量范例进行测试,允许在前 3 周调整剂量。主要疗效终点(PANSS总分从基线到第6周的变化)未达标,但匹马凡色林的改善幅度大于安慰剂(LS平均差异:-2.1,[95% CI:-4.5,0.4];P = .094)。由于采用了分层测试程序,因此额外的疗效分析是探索性的。第6周时,皮马伐林的PANSS阴性症状分量表(LS平均差:-0.7,[95% CI:-1.5,0.0])和Marder阴性症状因子评分(-0.9,[-1.7,-0.1])与安慰剂相比有明显差异。对欧洲研究机构(81.5%的患者)的分析显示,匹马伐林与安慰剂相比,在PANSS总分(LS平均差异:-3.1,[95% CI:-5.8,-0.4])和临床总体印象-严重程度评分(-0.2,[-0.4,-0.0])方面存在差异。39.9%的患者服用皮马伐林后出现了治疗突发不良事件,36.4%的患者服用安慰剂后出现了治疗突发不良事件。虽然主要终点未达到统计学意义,但观察到皮马伐林有改善阴性症状的趋势,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ENHANCE: Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Adjunctive Pimavanserin for Schizophrenia in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Antipsychotic Treatment.

Inadequate response to antipsychotic treatment is common in patients with schizophrenia. This study evaluated pimavanserin, a 5-HT 2A receptor inverse agonist/antagonist, as adjunctive treatment in patients with inadequate response. This was a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study conducted in North America and Europe. Adult outpatients with schizophrenia and inadequate response to current antipsychotic were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score ≥65 and ≤110 and retrospective antipsychotic treatment stability of 8 weeks. Pimavanserin 20 mg/day or placebo added to ongoing antipsychotic was tested in a flexible-dose paradigm with dose adjustments allowed during the first 3 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint, PANSS total score change from baseline to week 6, was not met, although improvement was greater with pimavanserin than placebo (LS mean difference: -2.1, [95% CI: -4.5, 0.4]; P = .094). As a hierarchical testing procedure was used, additional efficacy analyses were exploratory. Clear separation from placebo was observed with pimavanserin at week 6 for the PANSS Negative Symptoms subscale (LS mean difference: -0.7, [95% CI: -1.5, 0.0]) and Marder Negative Symptom Factor score (-0.9, [-1.7, -0.1]). Analysis of European sites (81.5% of patients) revealed a difference for pimavanserin versus placebo on PANSS total score (LS mean difference: -3.1, [95% CI: -5.8, -0.4]) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score (-0.2, [-0.4, -0.0]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 39.9% with pimavanserin and 36.4% with placebo. Although statistical significance for the primary endpoint was not met, a trend toward improvement in negative symptoms was observed with pimavanserin, warranting further study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信