喉切除术后吞钡时出现假性憩室不会影响早期饮食进展。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Saikrishna Ananthapadmanabhan, Eugene Wong, Lydia Natsis, Anand Suruliraj, Niranjan Sritharan, Mark Smith, Carsten E Palme, Faruque Riffat
{"title":"喉切除术后吞钡时出现假性憩室不会影响早期饮食进展。","authors":"Saikrishna Ananthapadmanabhan, Eugene Wong, Lydia Natsis, Anand Suruliraj, Niranjan Sritharan, Mark Smith, Carsten E Palme, Faruque Riffat","doi":"10.1002/hed.27921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The presence of a pseudodiverticulum of the anterior pharyngeal wall, or prominent \"pharyngeal bar,\" is a well-known phenomenon that occurs following total laryngectomy, which can be visualized by nasolaryngoscopy or videofluoroscopy. Among the different techniques of pharyngeal reconstruction, there is higher incidence following primary vertical multilayered closure. It has been postulated to cause dysphagia and lack of dietary progression despite a paucity of data. However, the direct impact of pseudodiverticulum is less clear and anecdotally its presence and severity does not necessarily correlate with dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case series was performed of all consecutive patients who underwent total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy between 2015 and 2022 at two tertiary head and neck institutions. All patients underwent routine videofluoroscopy postoperatively for swallow assessment. The presence of pseudodiverticulum on postoperative contrast swallow study was recorded to investigate the relationship with patient's ability to tolerate oral intake at 3 months discharge from the hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 50 laryngectomized patients (mean age 63.8 ± 10.0, 86% male), the main closure techniques were primary vertical (n = 9, 18%), primary T-closure (n = 14, 28%), and flap reconstruction (n = 27, 54%). Pseudodiverticulum was identified in 19 cases (38%). 43 patients underwent primary surgery and 30 had adjuvant radiotherapy. The presence of pseudodiverticulum was significantly associated with vertical primary closure versus non-vertical (T-closure or flap reconstruction) techniques (χ<sup>2</sup> (df 1) = 7.4, p = 0.007, OR = 5.7, 95% CI 1.3-24.7). Pseudodiverticulum was not associated with an increased inability to tolerate solid intake or full diet compared to patients without pseudodiverticulum. 26.3% of patients with pseudodiverticulum were on full diet compared to 25.8% of patients without. The vertical closure technique showed no difference in ability to maintain solid intake compared with non-vertical closure; however, no patients were on full diet. Only one patient in the pseudodiverticulum group required surgical management during the study period for retention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of a pseudodiverticulum does not appear to be significantly associated with a need for postoperative dietary modification. The authors postulate that postlaryngectomy dysphagia is multifactorial with sensorimotor aperistalsis of the pharynx and cricopharyngeal stenosis. While a pseudodiverticulum is a common phenomenon, patients did not require modification of diet at higher rates than those without, and they seldom require intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presence of postlaryngectomy pseudodiverticulum on barium swallow does not affect early dietary progression.\",\"authors\":\"Saikrishna Ananthapadmanabhan, Eugene Wong, Lydia Natsis, Anand Suruliraj, Niranjan Sritharan, Mark Smith, Carsten E Palme, Faruque Riffat\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.27921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The presence of a pseudodiverticulum of the anterior pharyngeal wall, or prominent \\\"pharyngeal bar,\\\" is a well-known phenomenon that occurs following total laryngectomy, which can be visualized by nasolaryngoscopy or videofluoroscopy. Among the different techniques of pharyngeal reconstruction, there is higher incidence following primary vertical multilayered closure. It has been postulated to cause dysphagia and lack of dietary progression despite a paucity of data. However, the direct impact of pseudodiverticulum is less clear and anecdotally its presence and severity does not necessarily correlate with dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case series was performed of all consecutive patients who underwent total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy between 2015 and 2022 at two tertiary head and neck institutions. All patients underwent routine videofluoroscopy postoperatively for swallow assessment. The presence of pseudodiverticulum on postoperative contrast swallow study was recorded to investigate the relationship with patient's ability to tolerate oral intake at 3 months discharge from the hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 50 laryngectomized patients (mean age 63.8 ± 10.0, 86% male), the main closure techniques were primary vertical (n = 9, 18%), primary T-closure (n = 14, 28%), and flap reconstruction (n = 27, 54%). Pseudodiverticulum was identified in 19 cases (38%). 43 patients underwent primary surgery and 30 had adjuvant radiotherapy. The presence of pseudodiverticulum was significantly associated with vertical primary closure versus non-vertical (T-closure or flap reconstruction) techniques (χ<sup>2</sup> (df 1) = 7.4, p = 0.007, OR = 5.7, 95% CI 1.3-24.7). Pseudodiverticulum was not associated with an increased inability to tolerate solid intake or full diet compared to patients without pseudodiverticulum. 26.3% of patients with pseudodiverticulum were on full diet compared to 25.8% of patients without. The vertical closure technique showed no difference in ability to maintain solid intake compared with non-vertical closure; however, no patients were on full diet. Only one patient in the pseudodiverticulum group required surgical management during the study period for retention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of a pseudodiverticulum does not appear to be significantly associated with a need for postoperative dietary modification. The authors postulate that postlaryngectomy dysphagia is multifactorial with sensorimotor aperistalsis of the pharynx and cricopharyngeal stenosis. While a pseudodiverticulum is a common phenomenon, patients did not require modification of diet at higher rates than those without, and they seldom require intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27921\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:咽前壁假憩室或突出的 "咽杆 "是全喉切除术后出现的一种众所周知的现象,可通过鼻咽喉镜或视频荧光镜观察到。在不同的咽部重建技术中,垂直多层一次闭合术的发生率较高。尽管数据匮乏,但假性咽闭合被推测会导致吞咽困难和饮食不进。然而,假性憩室的直接影响并不十分明确,而且据传闻,假性憩室的存在和严重程度并不一定与吞咽困难相关:方法:对2015年至2022年期间在两家三级头颈部医疗机构接受全喉切除术或喉咽切除术的所有连续患者进行了回顾性病例系列研究。所有患者术后均接受了常规视频荧光镜检查,以进行吞咽评估。记录术后对比吞咽检查中是否存在假性憩室,以研究其与患者出院3个月时耐受口腔摄入能力的关系:在50名喉切除术患者(平均年龄63.8 ± 10.0,86%为男性)中,主要的闭合技术为原发性垂直闭合(9人,占18%)、原发性T形闭合(14人,占28%)和皮瓣重建(27人,占54%)。有 19 例患者(38%)发现了假性憩室。43 例患者接受了初次手术,30 例接受了辅助放疗。假性憩室的存在与垂直原发闭合与非垂直(T 形闭合或皮瓣重建)技术显著相关(χ2 (df 1) = 7.4, p = 0.007, OR = 5.7, 95% CI 1.3-24.7)。与没有假性憩室的患者相比,假性憩室与不能耐受固体食物或全饮食的程度增加无关。26.3%的假性憩室患者可以完全进食,而 25.8% 的假性憩室患者不能完全进食。与非垂直闭合技术相比,垂直闭合技术在维持固体食物摄入的能力方面没有差异;但是,没有患者完全进食。假性憩室组中只有一名患者在研究期间因潴留而需要手术治疗:结论:假憩室的存在似乎与术后饮食调整的需求并无明显关联。作者推测喉切除术后吞咽困难是多因素造成的,包括咽部感觉运动性开口和环咽狭窄。虽然假性憩室是一种常见现象,但患者需要调整饮食的比例并不比没有假性憩室的患者高,而且他们很少需要干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Presence of postlaryngectomy pseudodiverticulum on barium swallow does not affect early dietary progression.

Background: The presence of a pseudodiverticulum of the anterior pharyngeal wall, or prominent "pharyngeal bar," is a well-known phenomenon that occurs following total laryngectomy, which can be visualized by nasolaryngoscopy or videofluoroscopy. Among the different techniques of pharyngeal reconstruction, there is higher incidence following primary vertical multilayered closure. It has been postulated to cause dysphagia and lack of dietary progression despite a paucity of data. However, the direct impact of pseudodiverticulum is less clear and anecdotally its presence and severity does not necessarily correlate with dysphagia.

Methods: A retrospective case series was performed of all consecutive patients who underwent total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy between 2015 and 2022 at two tertiary head and neck institutions. All patients underwent routine videofluoroscopy postoperatively for swallow assessment. The presence of pseudodiverticulum on postoperative contrast swallow study was recorded to investigate the relationship with patient's ability to tolerate oral intake at 3 months discharge from the hospital.

Results: Of 50 laryngectomized patients (mean age 63.8 ± 10.0, 86% male), the main closure techniques were primary vertical (n = 9, 18%), primary T-closure (n = 14, 28%), and flap reconstruction (n = 27, 54%). Pseudodiverticulum was identified in 19 cases (38%). 43 patients underwent primary surgery and 30 had adjuvant radiotherapy. The presence of pseudodiverticulum was significantly associated with vertical primary closure versus non-vertical (T-closure or flap reconstruction) techniques (χ2 (df 1) = 7.4, p = 0.007, OR = 5.7, 95% CI 1.3-24.7). Pseudodiverticulum was not associated with an increased inability to tolerate solid intake or full diet compared to patients without pseudodiverticulum. 26.3% of patients with pseudodiverticulum were on full diet compared to 25.8% of patients without. The vertical closure technique showed no difference in ability to maintain solid intake compared with non-vertical closure; however, no patients were on full diet. Only one patient in the pseudodiverticulum group required surgical management during the study period for retention.

Conclusion: The presence of a pseudodiverticulum does not appear to be significantly associated with a need for postoperative dietary modification. The authors postulate that postlaryngectomy dysphagia is multifactorial with sensorimotor aperistalsis of the pharynx and cricopharyngeal stenosis. While a pseudodiverticulum is a common phenomenon, patients did not require modification of diet at higher rates than those without, and they seldom require intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信