利用国际参考抗百日咳博德特氏菌小鼠血清 NIBSC 97/642 开发和验证抗小鼠百日咳免疫球蛋白 G 的酶联免疫吸附测定法。

IF 2.1 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Kyu-Ri Kang, Yi-Hyeon Kwon, Gyu-Won Cho, Gi-Sub Choi, Joon-Hwan Ji, Hyun-Mi Kang, Soo-Young Lee, Jin-Han Kang
{"title":"利用国际参考抗百日咳博德特氏菌小鼠血清 NIBSC 97/642 开发和验证抗小鼠百日咳免疫球蛋白 G 的酶联免疫吸附测定法。","authors":"Kyu-Ri Kang, Yi-Hyeon Kwon, Gyu-Won Cho, Gi-Sub Choi, Joon-Hwan Ji, Hyun-Mi Kang, Soo-Young Lee, Jin-Han Kang","doi":"10.7774/cevr.2024.13.3.242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this study, an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed and validated. The titer of ELISA was calculated using the reference line (RFL) method based on the standard curve drawn using the international reference anti-mouse serum NIBSC (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control) 97/642.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the development step, signal to noise was depicted to select the buffers that showed the most appropriate ratio. In the validation step, standard range, precision, dilution linearity, and specificity were confirmed, and RFL and parallel line (PLL) methods were compared in precision and dilution linearity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coating concentration for plate was achieved at 0.1 µg/mL for pertussis toxin (PT), 0.15 µg/mL for filamentous hemagglutinin antigen (FHA), and 0.25 µg/mL for pertactin (PRN). The signal to noise ratio was 22.02 for PT, 14.93 for FHA, and 8.02 for PRN with 0.25% goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a dilution buffer, and 2% skim milk in PBS as a blocking buffer. Based on the precision results, we assessed the lower limit of quantification by 1, 0.2, and 1.5 EU/mL concentration for PT, FHA, and PRN which met the ICH (International Council for Harmonization) M10 criteria of a 25% accuracy and total error of 40%. In specificity, homologous serum was spiked into heterologous serum and the accuracy met the criteria. There was no difference in the results between RFL and PLL calculations (p-value=0.3207 for PT, 0.7394 for FHA, 0.2109 for PRN).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ELISA validated with RFL calculation method in this study is a relatively accurate assay for mouse humoral immunogenicity test.</p>","PeriodicalId":51768,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-mouse pertussis immunoglobulin G using international reference anti-<i>Bordetella pertussis</i> mouse serum NIBSC 97/642.\",\"authors\":\"Kyu-Ri Kang, Yi-Hyeon Kwon, Gyu-Won Cho, Gi-Sub Choi, Joon-Hwan Ji, Hyun-Mi Kang, Soo-Young Lee, Jin-Han Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.7774/cevr.2024.13.3.242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this study, an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed and validated. The titer of ELISA was calculated using the reference line (RFL) method based on the standard curve drawn using the international reference anti-mouse serum NIBSC (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control) 97/642.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the development step, signal to noise was depicted to select the buffers that showed the most appropriate ratio. In the validation step, standard range, precision, dilution linearity, and specificity were confirmed, and RFL and parallel line (PLL) methods were compared in precision and dilution linearity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coating concentration for plate was achieved at 0.1 µg/mL for pertussis toxin (PT), 0.15 µg/mL for filamentous hemagglutinin antigen (FHA), and 0.25 µg/mL for pertactin (PRN). The signal to noise ratio was 22.02 for PT, 14.93 for FHA, and 8.02 for PRN with 0.25% goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a dilution buffer, and 2% skim milk in PBS as a blocking buffer. Based on the precision results, we assessed the lower limit of quantification by 1, 0.2, and 1.5 EU/mL concentration for PT, FHA, and PRN which met the ICH (International Council for Harmonization) M10 criteria of a 25% accuracy and total error of 40%. In specificity, homologous serum was spiked into heterologous serum and the accuracy met the criteria. There was no difference in the results between RFL and PLL calculations (p-value=0.3207 for PT, 0.7394 for FHA, 0.2109 for PRN).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ELISA validated with RFL calculation method in this study is a relatively accurate assay for mouse humoral immunogenicity test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319115/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2024.13.3.242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2024.13.3.242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究开发并验证了一种内部酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)。酶联免疫吸附测定的滴度是根据使用国际参考抗小鼠血清 NIBSC(美国国家生物标准与控制研究所)97/642绘制的标准曲线,采用参考线(RFL)法计算得出的:在开发阶段,对信噪比进行了描述,以选择显示出最合适比率的缓冲液。在验证步骤中,确认了标准范围、精确度、稀释线性和特异性,并比较了 RFL 和平行线(PLL)方法的精确度和稀释线性:百日咳毒素(PT)的平板涂布浓度为 0.1 微克/毫升,丝状血凝素抗原(FHA)的平板涂布浓度为 0.15 微克/毫升,百日咳素(PRN)的平板涂布浓度为 0.25 微克/毫升。以磷酸盐缓冲液(PBS)中的 0.25% 山羊血清为稀释缓冲液,以 PBS 中的 2% 脱脂奶为阻断缓冲液,PT 的信噪比为 22.02,FHA 为 14.93,PRN 为 8.02。根据精确度结果,我们评估了 PT、FHA 和 PRN 的定量下限,浓度分别为 1、0.2 和 1.5 EU/mL,符合 ICH(国际协调委员会)M10 标准,即准确度为 25%,总误差为 40%。在特异性方面,将同源血清添加到异源血清中,准确度符合标准。RFL 和 PLL 的计算结果没有差异(PT 的 p 值=0.3207,FHA 的 p 值=0.7394,PRN 的 p 值=0.2109):本研究中采用 RFL 计算方法验证的 ELISA 是一种相对准确的小鼠体液免疫原性检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-mouse pertussis immunoglobulin G using international reference anti-Bordetella pertussis mouse serum NIBSC 97/642.

Purpose: In this study, an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed and validated. The titer of ELISA was calculated using the reference line (RFL) method based on the standard curve drawn using the international reference anti-mouse serum NIBSC (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control) 97/642.

Materials and methods: In the development step, signal to noise was depicted to select the buffers that showed the most appropriate ratio. In the validation step, standard range, precision, dilution linearity, and specificity were confirmed, and RFL and parallel line (PLL) methods were compared in precision and dilution linearity.

Results: Coating concentration for plate was achieved at 0.1 µg/mL for pertussis toxin (PT), 0.15 µg/mL for filamentous hemagglutinin antigen (FHA), and 0.25 µg/mL for pertactin (PRN). The signal to noise ratio was 22.02 for PT, 14.93 for FHA, and 8.02 for PRN with 0.25% goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as a dilution buffer, and 2% skim milk in PBS as a blocking buffer. Based on the precision results, we assessed the lower limit of quantification by 1, 0.2, and 1.5 EU/mL concentration for PT, FHA, and PRN which met the ICH (International Council for Harmonization) M10 criteria of a 25% accuracy and total error of 40%. In specificity, homologous serum was spiked into heterologous serum and the accuracy met the criteria. There was no difference in the results between RFL and PLL calculations (p-value=0.3207 for PT, 0.7394 for FHA, 0.2109 for PRN).

Conclusion: ELISA validated with RFL calculation method in this study is a relatively accurate assay for mouse humoral immunogenicity test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clin Exp Vaccine Res, the official English journal of the Korean Vaccine Society, is an international, peer reviewed, and open-access journal. It covers all areas related to vaccines and vaccination. Clin Exp Vaccine Res publishes editorials, review articles, special articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications, and correspondences covering a wide range of clinical and experimental subjects including vaccines and vaccination for human and animals against infectious diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, parasites and tumor. The scope of the journal is to disseminate information that may contribute to elaborate vaccine development and vaccination strategies targeting infectious diseases and tumors in human and animals. Relevant topics range from experimental approaches to (pre)clinical trials for the vaccine research based on, but not limited to, basic laboratory, translational, and (pre)clinical investigations, epidemiology of infectious diseases and progression of all aspects in the health related issues. It is published printed and open accessed online issues (https://ecevr.org) two times per year in 31 January and 31 July. Clin Exp Vaccine Res is linked to many international databases and is made freely available to institutions and individuals worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信