放射手术治疗室性心动过速的优化目标划定程序:与观察者无关的准确性。

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5603/rpor.100387
Jan Hecko, Lukas Knybel, Marian Rybar, Marek Penhaker, Otakar Jiravsky, Radek Neuwirth, Marek Sramko, Jana Haskova, Josef Kautzner, Jakub Cvek
{"title":"放射手术治疗室性心动过速的优化目标划定程序:与观察者无关的准确性。","authors":"Jan Hecko, Lukas Knybel, Marian Rybar, Marek Penhaker, Otakar Jiravsky, Radek Neuwirth, Marek Sramko, Jana Haskova, Josef Kautzner, Jakub Cvek","doi":"10.5603/rpor.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Part of the current stereotactic arrythmia radioablation (STAR) workflow is transfer of findings from the electroanatomic mapping (EAM) to computed tomography (CT). Here, we analyzed inter- and intraobserver variation in a modified EAM-CT registration using automatic registration algorithms designed to yield higher robustness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This work is based on data of 10 patients who had previously undergone STAR. Two observers participated in this study: (1) an electrophysiologist technician (cardiology) with substatial experience in EAM-CT merge, and (2) a clinical engineer (radiotherapy) with minimum experience with EAM-CT merge. EAM-CT merge consists of 3 main steps: segmentation of left ventricle from CT (CT LV), registration of the CT LV and EAM, clinical target volume (CTV) delineation from EAM specific points. Mean Hausdorff distance (MHD), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and absolute difference in Center of Gravity (CoG) were used to assess intra/interobserver variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraobserver variability: The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CT LVs altogether was 0.92 ± 0.01 and 1.49 ± 0.23 mm. The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CTVs altogether was 0,82 ± 0,06 and 0,71 ± 0,22 mm. Interobserver variability: Segmented CT LVs showed great similarity (mean DSC of 0,91 ± 0,01, MHD of 1,86 ± 0,47 mm). The mean DSC comparing CTVs from both observers was 0,81 ± 0,11 and MHD was 0,87 ± 0,45 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high interobserver similarity of segmented LVs and delineated CTVs confirmed the robustness of the proposed method. Even an inexperienced user can perform a precise EAM-CT merge following workflow instructions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47283,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"29 3","pages":"280-289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized target delineation procedure for the radiosurgery treatment of ventricular tachycardia: observer-independent accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Hecko, Lukas Knybel, Marian Rybar, Marek Penhaker, Otakar Jiravsky, Radek Neuwirth, Marek Sramko, Jana Haskova, Josef Kautzner, Jakub Cvek\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/rpor.100387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Part of the current stereotactic arrythmia radioablation (STAR) workflow is transfer of findings from the electroanatomic mapping (EAM) to computed tomography (CT). Here, we analyzed inter- and intraobserver variation in a modified EAM-CT registration using automatic registration algorithms designed to yield higher robustness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This work is based on data of 10 patients who had previously undergone STAR. Two observers participated in this study: (1) an electrophysiologist technician (cardiology) with substatial experience in EAM-CT merge, and (2) a clinical engineer (radiotherapy) with minimum experience with EAM-CT merge. EAM-CT merge consists of 3 main steps: segmentation of left ventricle from CT (CT LV), registration of the CT LV and EAM, clinical target volume (CTV) delineation from EAM specific points. Mean Hausdorff distance (MHD), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and absolute difference in Center of Gravity (CoG) were used to assess intra/interobserver variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraobserver variability: The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CT LVs altogether was 0.92 ± 0.01 and 1.49 ± 0.23 mm. The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CTVs altogether was 0,82 ± 0,06 and 0,71 ± 0,22 mm. Interobserver variability: Segmented CT LVs showed great similarity (mean DSC of 0,91 ± 0,01, MHD of 1,86 ± 0,47 mm). The mean DSC comparing CTVs from both observers was 0,81 ± 0,11 and MHD was 0,87 ± 0,45 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high interobserver similarity of segmented LVs and delineated CTVs confirmed the robustness of the proposed method. Even an inexperienced user can perform a precise EAM-CT merge following workflow instructions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"280-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.100387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.100387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前立体定向心律失常射频消融术(STAR)工作流程的一部分是将电解剖图(EAM)上的检查结果转移到计算机断层扫描(CT)上。在此,我们使用旨在提高稳健性的自动配准算法分析了改良 EAM-CT 配准中观察者之间和观察者内部的差异:这项研究基于 10 位曾接受 STAR 检查的患者的数据。两名观察者参与了这项研究:(1) 一名电生理技师(心脏病学),具有 EAM-CT 合并的次空间经验;(2) 一名临床工程师(放射治疗),具有 EAM-CT 合并的最低经验。EAM-CT 合并包括 3 个主要步骤:从 CT(CT 左心室)分割左心室、CT 左心室和 EAM 注册、从 EAM 特定点划分临床目标容积(CTV)。平均豪斯多夫距离(MHD)、骰子相似系数(DSC)和重心绝对差值(CoG)用于评估观察者内部/观察者之间的变异性:观察者内变异性:3 个 CT 左心室的平均 DSC 和 MHD 分别为 0.92 ± 0.01 毫米和 1.49 ± 0.23 毫米。3 个 CTV 的平均 DSC 和 MHD 分别为 0.82 ± 0.06 和 0.71 ± 0.22 毫米。观察者间变异性:CT 左心室分段显示出很大的相似性(平均 DSC 为 0.91 ± 0.01,MHD 为 1.86 ± 0.47 毫米)。两位观察者的 CTV 比较的平均 DSC 为 0.81 ± 0.11,MHD 为 0.87 ± 0.45 mm:观察者间左心室分割和 CTV 划分的高度相似性证实了该方法的稳健性。即使是没有经验的用户也能按照工作流程说明进行精确的 EAM-CT 合并。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimized target delineation procedure for the radiosurgery treatment of ventricular tachycardia: observer-independent accuracy.

Background: Part of the current stereotactic arrythmia radioablation (STAR) workflow is transfer of findings from the electroanatomic mapping (EAM) to computed tomography (CT). Here, we analyzed inter- and intraobserver variation in a modified EAM-CT registration using automatic registration algorithms designed to yield higher robustness.

Materials and methods: This work is based on data of 10 patients who had previously undergone STAR. Two observers participated in this study: (1) an electrophysiologist technician (cardiology) with substatial experience in EAM-CT merge, and (2) a clinical engineer (radiotherapy) with minimum experience with EAM-CT merge. EAM-CT merge consists of 3 main steps: segmentation of left ventricle from CT (CT LV), registration of the CT LV and EAM, clinical target volume (CTV) delineation from EAM specific points. Mean Hausdorff distance (MHD), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and absolute difference in Center of Gravity (CoG) were used to assess intra/interobserver variability.

Results: Intraobserver variability: The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CT LVs altogether was 0.92 ± 0.01 and 1.49 ± 0.23 mm. The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CTVs altogether was 0,82 ± 0,06 and 0,71 ± 0,22 mm. Interobserver variability: Segmented CT LVs showed great similarity (mean DSC of 0,91 ± 0,01, MHD of 1,86 ± 0,47 mm). The mean DSC comparing CTVs from both observers was 0,81 ± 0,11 and MHD was 0,87 ± 0,45 mm.

Conclusions: The high interobserver similarity of segmented LVs and delineated CTVs confirmed the robustness of the proposed method. Even an inexperienced user can perform a precise EAM-CT merge following workflow instructions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is an interdisciplinary bimonthly journal, publishing original contributions in clinical oncology and radiotherapy, as well as in radiotherapy physics, techniques and radiotherapy equipment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is a journal of the Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Czech Society of Radiation Oncology, the Hungarian Society for Radiation Oncology, the Slovenian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Polish Study Group of Head and Neck Cancer, the Guild of Bulgarian Radiotherapists and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, affiliated with the Spanish Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and the Portuguese Society of Radiotherapy - Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信