乌克兰切尔诺贝利清理工人流行病学研究的剂量重建。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Vladimir Drozdovitch, Victor Kryuchkov, Elena Bakhanova, Petro Bondarenko, Konstantin Chizhov, Ivan Golovanov, Vadim Chumak
{"title":"乌克兰切尔诺贝利清理工人流行病学研究的剂量重建。","authors":"Vladimir Drozdovitch, Victor Kryuchkov, Elena Bakhanova, Petro Bondarenko, Konstantin Chizhov, Ivan Golovanov, Vadim Chumak","doi":"10.1667/RADE-23-00117.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present paper provides an overview of the methods and summarizes the results of estimating radiation doses and their uncertainties for Ukrainian-American epidemiological studies among the Chernobyl (Chornobyl) cleanup workers. After the Chernobyl accident occurred on April 26, 1986, more than 300,000 Ukrainian cleanup workers took part between 1986 and 1990 in decontamination and recovery activities at the site of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The U.S. National Cancer Institute in collaboration with the Ukrainian National Research Center for Radiation Medicine conducted several epidemiological studies in this population. An important part of these studies was the reconstruction of the study participants' radiation doses and the assessment of uncertainties in doses. A method called realistic analytical dose reconstruction with uncertainty estimation (RADRUE) was used to calculate the doses from external irradiation during cleanup missions, which was the main exposure pathway for most study participants. At the initial phase of the accident during the atmospheric releases of radioactivity from the destroyed reactor, the cleanup workers also received doses from inhalation of radionuclides. In addition, study participants received doses at their places of residence, especially those who lived in highly contaminated areas. The radiation doses estimated for 2,048 male cleanup workers included in the Ukrainian-American epidemiological studies varied widely: (i) bone-marrow doses from external irradiation in the case-control study of leukemia of 1,000 cleanup workers ranged from 3.7 × 10-5 mGy to 3.3 Gy (mean = 92 mGy); (ii) thyroid doses in the case-control study of thyroid cancer in 607 persons from all exposure pathways combined were from 0.15 mGy to 9.0 Gy (mean = 199 mGy); (iii) gonadal doses in 183 cleanup workers from all exposure pathways combined in the study of germline mutations in the offspring after parental irradiation (trio study) ranged from 0.58 mGy to 4.1 Gy (mean = 392 mGy); (iv) thyroid doses in the human factor uncertainties study among 47 persons were from 20 mGy to 2.1 Gy (mean = 295 mGy); and (v) lung doses in the study of germline genetic variants associated with host susceptibility to COVID-19 estimated for 211 cleanup workers were from 0.024 mGy to 2.5 Gy (mean = 249 mGy). Doses of female cleanup workers were much lower than those of male cleanup workers: the mean doses for female cleanup workers were 27 mGy for 34 women included in the trio study and 56 mGy for 48 women participated in the study of germline genetic variants associated with host susceptibility to COVID-19. Uncertainties in dose estimates included two components: (i) inherent uncertainties arising from the stochastic random variability of the parameters used in exposure assessment and from a lack of knowledge about the true values of the parameters; and (ii) human factor uncertainties due to poor memory recall resulting in incomplete, inaccurate, or missing responses during personal interviews with cleanup workers conducted long after exposure. This paper also discusses possible developments and improvements in the methods to assess the radiation doses and associated uncertainties for cleanup workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"626-638"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose Reconstruction for Epidemiological Studies among Ukrainian Chernobyl Cleanup Workers.\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Drozdovitch, Victor Kryuchkov, Elena Bakhanova, Petro Bondarenko, Konstantin Chizhov, Ivan Golovanov, Vadim Chumak\",\"doi\":\"10.1667/RADE-23-00117.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present paper provides an overview of the methods and summarizes the results of estimating radiation doses and their uncertainties for Ukrainian-American epidemiological studies among the Chernobyl (Chornobyl) cleanup workers. After the Chernobyl accident occurred on April 26, 1986, more than 300,000 Ukrainian cleanup workers took part between 1986 and 1990 in decontamination and recovery activities at the site of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The U.S. National Cancer Institute in collaboration with the Ukrainian National Research Center for Radiation Medicine conducted several epidemiological studies in this population. An important part of these studies was the reconstruction of the study participants' radiation doses and the assessment of uncertainties in doses. A method called realistic analytical dose reconstruction with uncertainty estimation (RADRUE) was used to calculate the doses from external irradiation during cleanup missions, which was the main exposure pathway for most study participants. At the initial phase of the accident during the atmospheric releases of radioactivity from the destroyed reactor, the cleanup workers also received doses from inhalation of radionuclides. In addition, study participants received doses at their places of residence, especially those who lived in highly contaminated areas. The radiation doses estimated for 2,048 male cleanup workers included in the Ukrainian-American epidemiological studies varied widely: (i) bone-marrow doses from external irradiation in the case-control study of leukemia of 1,000 cleanup workers ranged from 3.7 × 10-5 mGy to 3.3 Gy (mean = 92 mGy); (ii) thyroid doses in the case-control study of thyroid cancer in 607 persons from all exposure pathways combined were from 0.15 mGy to 9.0 Gy (mean = 199 mGy); (iii) gonadal doses in 183 cleanup workers from all exposure pathways combined in the study of germline mutations in the offspring after parental irradiation (trio study) ranged from 0.58 mGy to 4.1 Gy (mean = 392 mGy); (iv) thyroid doses in the human factor uncertainties study among 47 persons were from 20 mGy to 2.1 Gy (mean = 295 mGy); and (v) lung doses in the study of germline genetic variants associated with host susceptibility to COVID-19 estimated for 211 cleanup workers were from 0.024 mGy to 2.5 Gy (mean = 249 mGy). Doses of female cleanup workers were much lower than those of male cleanup workers: the mean doses for female cleanup workers were 27 mGy for 34 women included in the trio study and 56 mGy for 48 women participated in the study of germline genetic variants associated with host susceptibility to COVID-19. Uncertainties in dose estimates included two components: (i) inherent uncertainties arising from the stochastic random variability of the parameters used in exposure assessment and from a lack of knowledge about the true values of the parameters; and (ii) human factor uncertainties due to poor memory recall resulting in incomplete, inaccurate, or missing responses during personal interviews with cleanup workers conducted long after exposure. This paper also discusses possible developments and improvements in the methods to assess the radiation doses and associated uncertainties for cleanup workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"626-638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481421/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-23-00117.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-23-00117.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文概述了切尔诺贝利(切尔诺贝利)清理工人中乌克兰裔美国人流行病学研究的辐射剂量及其不确定性的估算方法和结果。1986 年 4 月 26 日切尔诺贝利事故发生后,1986 年至 1990 年间,30 多万乌克兰清理工人参与了切尔诺贝利核电站现场的去污和恢复活动。美国国家癌症研究所与乌克兰国家辐射医学研究中心合作,对这一人群进行了多项流行病学研究。这些研究的一个重要部分是重建研究参与者的辐射剂量和评估剂量的不确定性。使用了一种名为 "带不确定性估计的现实分析剂量重建"(RADRUE)的方法来计算清理任务期间的外部辐照剂量,这是大多数研究参与者的主要辐照途径。在事故初期,被摧毁的反应堆向大气释放放射性时,清理人员也会因吸入放射性核素而受到辐射剂量。此外,研究参与者在其居住地也受到了辐射,特别是那些居住在高污染地区的人。乌克兰-美国流行病学研究中包括的 2,048 名男性清理工人估计的辐射剂量差别很大:(i) 在对 1,000 名清理工人进行的白血病病例对照研究中,外照射造成的骨髓剂量从 3.7 × 10-5 mGy 到 3.3 Gy 不等(平均值 = 92 mGy);(ii) 在对 607 人进行的甲状腺癌病例对照研究中,所有照射途径合计造成的甲状腺剂量从 0.15 mGy 到 9.0 Gy (平均值 = 199 mGy);(iii) 在父母辐照后子代生殖突变的研究(三重研究)中,183 名来自所有辐照途径的清理工人的性腺剂量介于 0.58 mGy 至 4.1 Gy(平均值 = 392 mGy);(iv) 47 人在人体因素不确定性研究中的甲状腺剂量为 20 mGy 至 2.1 Gy(平均值 = 295 mGy);(v) 在与宿主对 COVID-19 易感性相关的种系遗传变异研究中,估计 211 名清理工人的肺部剂量为 0.024 mGy 至 2.5 Gy(平均值 = 249 mGy)。女性清洁工人的剂量远低于男性清洁工人:34 名女性清洁工人参加了三人研究,其平均剂量为 27 mGy;48 名女性清洁工人参加了与宿主对 COVID-19 易感性相关的种系遗传变异研究,其平均剂量为 56 mGy。剂量估算的不确定性包括两部分:(i) 暴露评估中使用的参数的随机变异性和对参数真实值的不了解所产生的固有不确定性;以及 (ii) 暴露后很长时间对清理工人进行个人访谈时,由于记忆力差导致回答不完整、不准确或缺失而产生的人为因素不确定性。本文还讨论了评估清理工人辐射剂量和相关不确定性的方法的可能发展和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dose Reconstruction for Epidemiological Studies among Ukrainian Chernobyl Cleanup Workers.

The present paper provides an overview of the methods and summarizes the results of estimating radiation doses and their uncertainties for Ukrainian-American epidemiological studies among the Chernobyl (Chornobyl) cleanup workers. After the Chernobyl accident occurred on April 26, 1986, more than 300,000 Ukrainian cleanup workers took part between 1986 and 1990 in decontamination and recovery activities at the site of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The U.S. National Cancer Institute in collaboration with the Ukrainian National Research Center for Radiation Medicine conducted several epidemiological studies in this population. An important part of these studies was the reconstruction of the study participants' radiation doses and the assessment of uncertainties in doses. A method called realistic analytical dose reconstruction with uncertainty estimation (RADRUE) was used to calculate the doses from external irradiation during cleanup missions, which was the main exposure pathway for most study participants. At the initial phase of the accident during the atmospheric releases of radioactivity from the destroyed reactor, the cleanup workers also received doses from inhalation of radionuclides. In addition, study participants received doses at their places of residence, especially those who lived in highly contaminated areas. The radiation doses estimated for 2,048 male cleanup workers included in the Ukrainian-American epidemiological studies varied widely: (i) bone-marrow doses from external irradiation in the case-control study of leukemia of 1,000 cleanup workers ranged from 3.7 × 10-5 mGy to 3.3 Gy (mean = 92 mGy); (ii) thyroid doses in the case-control study of thyroid cancer in 607 persons from all exposure pathways combined were from 0.15 mGy to 9.0 Gy (mean = 199 mGy); (iii) gonadal doses in 183 cleanup workers from all exposure pathways combined in the study of germline mutations in the offspring after parental irradiation (trio study) ranged from 0.58 mGy to 4.1 Gy (mean = 392 mGy); (iv) thyroid doses in the human factor uncertainties study among 47 persons were from 20 mGy to 2.1 Gy (mean = 295 mGy); and (v) lung doses in the study of germline genetic variants associated with host susceptibility to COVID-19 estimated for 211 cleanup workers were from 0.024 mGy to 2.5 Gy (mean = 249 mGy). Doses of female cleanup workers were much lower than those of male cleanup workers: the mean doses for female cleanup workers were 27 mGy for 34 women included in the trio study and 56 mGy for 48 women participated in the study of germline genetic variants associated with host susceptibility to COVID-19. Uncertainties in dose estimates included two components: (i) inherent uncertainties arising from the stochastic random variability of the parameters used in exposure assessment and from a lack of knowledge about the true values of the parameters; and (ii) human factor uncertainties due to poor memory recall resulting in incomplete, inaccurate, or missing responses during personal interviews with cleanup workers conducted long after exposure. This paper also discusses possible developments and improvements in the methods to assess the radiation doses and associated uncertainties for cleanup workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation research
Radiation research 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
179
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Radiation Research publishes original articles dealing with radiation effects and related subjects in the areas of physics, chemistry, biology and medicine, including epidemiology and translational research. The term radiation is used in its broadest sense and includes specifically ionizing radiation and ultraviolet, visible and infrared light as well as microwaves, ultrasound and heat. Effects may be physical, chemical or biological. Related subjects include (but are not limited to) dosimetry methods and instrumentation, isotope techniques and studies with chemical agents contributing to the understanding of radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信