在肠功能衰竭患者中使用导丝更换中心静脉导管的实用性:一项单中心研究。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Tsuyoshi Sakurai, Masatoshi Hashimoto, Hironori Kudo, Ryuji Okubo, Takuro Kazama, Taichi Fukuzawa, Ryo Ando, Endo Yuki, Keisuke Tada, Motoshi Wada
{"title":"在肠功能衰竭患者中使用导丝更换中心静脉导管的实用性:一项单中心研究。","authors":"Tsuyoshi Sakurai, Masatoshi Hashimoto, Hironori Kudo, Ryuji Okubo, Takuro Kazama, Taichi Fukuzawa, Ryo Ando, Endo Yuki, Keisuke Tada, Motoshi Wada","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05806-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with intestinal failure (IF) require long-term parenteral nutrition using central venous catheters (CVCs), which often require replacement. We adopted a less fallible guidewire replacement (GWR) method and verified its effectiveness and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 108 cases that underwent a CVC replacement with \"GWR\" method with IF at our department between 2013 and 2023. We retrospectively reviewed patients' clinical details with tunneled CVC (Hickman/Broviac catheter). For the analysis, we compared for the same time period the catheter exchange method \"Primary placement\"; newly inserted catheter by venipuncture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of catheter replacement using GWR was 94.4%. There were six unsuccessful cases. A log-rank test showed no significant difference in catheter survival between primary placement and the GWR, and the time to first infection was significantly longer in the GWR (p = 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two methods until the first infection, when the exchange indication was limited to infections. In the same way, when the indication was restricted to catheter-related bloodstream infection, there was no significant difference in catheter survival between the two approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our GWR procedure was easy to perform and stable, with a high success rate and almost no complications. Moreover, using a guidewire did not increase the frequency of catheter replacement and the infection rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"40 1","pages":"226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of central venous catheter replacement with a guidewire in patients with intestinal failure: a single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Tsuyoshi Sakurai, Masatoshi Hashimoto, Hironori Kudo, Ryuji Okubo, Takuro Kazama, Taichi Fukuzawa, Ryo Ando, Endo Yuki, Keisuke Tada, Motoshi Wada\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00383-024-05806-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with intestinal failure (IF) require long-term parenteral nutrition using central venous catheters (CVCs), which often require replacement. We adopted a less fallible guidewire replacement (GWR) method and verified its effectiveness and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 108 cases that underwent a CVC replacement with \\\"GWR\\\" method with IF at our department between 2013 and 2023. We retrospectively reviewed patients' clinical details with tunneled CVC (Hickman/Broviac catheter). For the analysis, we compared for the same time period the catheter exchange method \\\"Primary placement\\\"; newly inserted catheter by venipuncture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of catheter replacement using GWR was 94.4%. There were six unsuccessful cases. A log-rank test showed no significant difference in catheter survival between primary placement and the GWR, and the time to first infection was significantly longer in the GWR (p = 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two methods until the first infection, when the exchange indication was limited to infections. In the same way, when the indication was restricted to catheter-related bloodstream infection, there was no significant difference in catheter survival between the two approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our GWR procedure was easy to perform and stable, with a high success rate and almost no complications. Moreover, using a guidewire did not increase the frequency of catheter replacement and the infection rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05806-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05806-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肠功能衰竭(IF)患者需要长期使用中心静脉导管(CVC)进行肠外营养,而中心静脉导管经常需要更换。我们采用了误差较小的导丝置换(GWR)方法,并验证了其有效性和有效性:方法:我们选取了 2013 年至 2023 年期间在我科接受 "GWR "法 IF 更换 CVC 的 108 例患者。我们回顾性审查了患者使用隧道式 CVC(Hickman/Broviac 导管)的临床细节。为了进行分析,我们比较了同一时期的导管更换方法 "初次置管";通过静脉穿刺新插入的导管:使用 GWR 更换导管的成功率为 94.4%。结果:使用 GWR 更换导管的成功率为 94.4%,有 6 例不成功。对数秩检验显示,初次置管与 GWR 的导管存活率无明显差异,而 GWR 的首次感染时间明显更长(p = 0.001)。此外,当交换指征仅限于感染时,两种方法在首次感染前没有明显差异。同样,当指征仅限于导管相关血流感染时,两种方法的导管存活时间也没有明显差异:结论:我们的 GWR 手术操作简单、稳定,成功率高,几乎没有并发症。此外,使用导丝不会增加导管更换频率和感染率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Usefulness of central venous catheter replacement with a guidewire in patients with intestinal failure: a single-center study.

Usefulness of central venous catheter replacement with a guidewire in patients with intestinal failure: a single-center study.

Purpose: Patients with intestinal failure (IF) require long-term parenteral nutrition using central venous catheters (CVCs), which often require replacement. We adopted a less fallible guidewire replacement (GWR) method and verified its effectiveness and validity.

Methods: We enrolled 108 cases that underwent a CVC replacement with "GWR" method with IF at our department between 2013 and 2023. We retrospectively reviewed patients' clinical details with tunneled CVC (Hickman/Broviac catheter). For the analysis, we compared for the same time period the catheter exchange method "Primary placement"; newly inserted catheter by venipuncture.

Results: The success rate of catheter replacement using GWR was 94.4%. There were six unsuccessful cases. A log-rank test showed no significant difference in catheter survival between primary placement and the GWR, and the time to first infection was significantly longer in the GWR (p = 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two methods until the first infection, when the exchange indication was limited to infections. In the same way, when the indication was restricted to catheter-related bloodstream infection, there was no significant difference in catheter survival between the two approaches.

Conclusion: Our GWR procedure was easy to perform and stable, with a high success rate and almost no complications. Moreover, using a guidewire did not increase the frequency of catheter replacement and the infection rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信