2022 年 ASMBS 和 IFSO 减肥手术指南的传播:初级保健提供者了解到了什么?

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07449-1
John Hulse, Richard Slay, Mary Kate Bryant, T Karl Byrne, Rana Pullatt
{"title":"2022 年 ASMBS 和 IFSO 减肥手术指南的传播:初级保健提供者了解到了什么?","authors":"John Hulse, Richard Slay, Mary Kate Bryant, T Karl Byrne, Rana Pullatt","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07449-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Only 1% of Americans eligible for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) receive MBS. Prior studies have analyzed primary care provider (PCP) referral patterns and perceptions of MBS as a potential barrier to increasing MBS. However, less data exists regarding PCP knowledge of MBS indications and outcomes. Following the 2022 update to the indications for MBS by the ASMBS and IFSO, the number of eligible patients is only expected to increase. We evaluated PCP knowledge regarding the existence of the 2022 ASMBS and IFSO updated guidelines, MBS indications, and MBS outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 11-question survey was emailed to primary care residents, advanced practice providers, and faculty at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 151 surveys distributed, 39.7% responded (n = 60). 95% were unaware of the 2022 updated guidelines. On multiple choice questions, 16.3% correctly identified the average weight loss from MBS, and 46.8% correctly answered the diabetes remission rate following MBS. Trainee answers were not statistically significant from practicing PCPs. Fifteen respondents had referred a patient for MBS, but this subgroup did not perform significantly better on the assessment. A total of 72.3% of respondents reported inadequate MBS education during their training, and 85.1% were interested in additional education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We present the first assessment of PCP MBS knowledge since the release of the 2022 updated ASMBS and IFSO guidelines. This study indicates a gap in PCPs' knowledge regarding the updated guidelines and represents an opportunity for collaboration with our primary care colleagues to provide further MBS education.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissemination of the 2022 ASMBS and IFSO Guidelines for Bariatric Surgery: What Has Reached Primary Care Providers?\",\"authors\":\"John Hulse, Richard Slay, Mary Kate Bryant, T Karl Byrne, Rana Pullatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-024-07449-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Only 1% of Americans eligible for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) receive MBS. Prior studies have analyzed primary care provider (PCP) referral patterns and perceptions of MBS as a potential barrier to increasing MBS. However, less data exists regarding PCP knowledge of MBS indications and outcomes. Following the 2022 update to the indications for MBS by the ASMBS and IFSO, the number of eligible patients is only expected to increase. We evaluated PCP knowledge regarding the existence of the 2022 ASMBS and IFSO updated guidelines, MBS indications, and MBS outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 11-question survey was emailed to primary care residents, advanced practice providers, and faculty at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 151 surveys distributed, 39.7% responded (n = 60). 95% were unaware of the 2022 updated guidelines. On multiple choice questions, 16.3% correctly identified the average weight loss from MBS, and 46.8% correctly answered the diabetes remission rate following MBS. Trainee answers were not statistically significant from practicing PCPs. Fifteen respondents had referred a patient for MBS, but this subgroup did not perform significantly better on the assessment. A total of 72.3% of respondents reported inadequate MBS education during their training, and 85.1% were interested in additional education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We present the first assessment of PCP MBS knowledge since the release of the 2022 updated ASMBS and IFSO guidelines. This study indicates a gap in PCPs' knowledge regarding the updated guidelines and represents an opportunity for collaboration with our primary care colleagues to provide further MBS education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349814/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07449-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07449-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:符合代谢和减肥手术(MBS)条件的美国人中只有 1%接受了 MBS。先前的研究分析了初级保健提供者(PCP)的转诊模式和对 MBS 的看法,认为这是增加 MBS 的潜在障碍。然而,有关初级保健医生对 MBS 适应症和结果的了解的数据较少。2022 年,ASMBS 和 IFSO 更新了 MBS 的适应症,预计符合条件的患者人数只会增加。我们评估了初级保健医生对 2022 年 ASMBS 和 IFSO 更新指南、MBS 适应症和 MBS 结果的了解情况:方法:我们通过电子邮件向一家医疗机构的初级保健住院医师、高级医师和教师发送了一份包含 11 个问题的调查问卷:结果:在发放的 151 份调查问卷中,39.7% 的人做出了回复(n = 60)。95%的人不知道 2022 年更新的指南。在多项选择题中,16.3%的人正确指出了MBS的平均体重减轻率,46.8%的人正确回答了MBS后的糖尿病缓解率。受训人员的答案与执业初级保健医生的答案相比没有统计学意义。有 15 名受访者曾转诊过一名患者进行乳腺导管介入治疗,但这一分组在评估中的表现并没有明显改善。共有 72.3% 的受访者表示他们在接受培训期间未接受过充分的 MBS 教育,85.1% 的受访者表示有兴趣接受更多教育:自 2022 年 ASMBS 和 IFSO 指南发布以来,我们首次对初级保健医生的 MBS 知识进行了评估。这项研究表明,初级保健医生对更新版指南的了解还存在差距,这为我们与初级保健同行合作提供进一步的 MBS 教育提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dissemination of the 2022 ASMBS and IFSO Guidelines for Bariatric Surgery: What Has Reached Primary Care Providers?

Dissemination of the 2022 ASMBS and IFSO Guidelines for Bariatric Surgery: What Has Reached Primary Care Providers?

Background: Only 1% of Americans eligible for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) receive MBS. Prior studies have analyzed primary care provider (PCP) referral patterns and perceptions of MBS as a potential barrier to increasing MBS. However, less data exists regarding PCP knowledge of MBS indications and outcomes. Following the 2022 update to the indications for MBS by the ASMBS and IFSO, the number of eligible patients is only expected to increase. We evaluated PCP knowledge regarding the existence of the 2022 ASMBS and IFSO updated guidelines, MBS indications, and MBS outcomes.

Methods: An 11-question survey was emailed to primary care residents, advanced practice providers, and faculty at a single institution.

Results: Of 151 surveys distributed, 39.7% responded (n = 60). 95% were unaware of the 2022 updated guidelines. On multiple choice questions, 16.3% correctly identified the average weight loss from MBS, and 46.8% correctly answered the diabetes remission rate following MBS. Trainee answers were not statistically significant from practicing PCPs. Fifteen respondents had referred a patient for MBS, but this subgroup did not perform significantly better on the assessment. A total of 72.3% of respondents reported inadequate MBS education during their training, and 85.1% were interested in additional education.

Conclusions: We present the first assessment of PCP MBS knowledge since the release of the 2022 updated ASMBS and IFSO guidelines. This study indicates a gap in PCPs' knowledge regarding the updated guidelines and represents an opportunity for collaboration with our primary care colleagues to provide further MBS education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信