探索肥胖症女性对三种时间匹配运动干预的接受度:对 EXOFFIT 研究的混合方法评估。

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-14 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.70003
Mary E Davis, Caitriona Cunningham, Catherine Blake, Gráinne O'Donoghue
{"title":"探索肥胖症女性对三种时间匹配运动干预的接受度:对 EXOFFIT 研究的混合方法评估。","authors":"Mary E Davis, Caitriona Cunningham, Catherine Blake, Gráinne O'Donoghue","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The EXOFFIT study compared the effectiveness of three time-matched exercise interventions in women with obesity for improving cardiorespiratory fitness. To best inform future research, evaluation of the interventions' acceptability is needed. Previous research has been inconsistent with methods and reporting of acceptability. Thus, the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) can be utilized to ensure that all aspects of acceptability are evaluated. No study to date in women with obesity has utilized the TFA in conjunction with quantitative data (i.e., frequencies of themes) to highlight the aspects of interventions that may be most important for participants.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the acceptability of the EXOFFIT program and gain insight into the participants' experience of participation, their perspective on the acceptability of trial procedures and interventions and gather their feedback on program changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed. Thirty-eight participants who completed the exercise interventions were interviewed and completed a self-reported exit questionnaire. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed in three phases: emergent themes were agreed upon, then mapped to the TFA constructs and the frequencies of each construct and theme were presented as counts. Data collected from the exit questionnaire were collated and reported using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All seven TFA constructs were identified in the analysis. The EXOFFIT program was found to have a high level of acceptability, with affective attitude, perceived effectiveness and self-efficacy being the most reported constructs. The burden and opportunity costs associated with the program were mainly related to family commitments and support needed to participate. Any negative impact of participation was noted to be outweighed by the perceived benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study will inform the development of future programs with women with obesity and support the consideration of the TFA constructs from the outset of study design.Clinical Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN13517067.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"10 4","pages":"e70003"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the acceptability of three time-matched exercise interventions for increasing fitness in women living with obesity: A mixed-methods evaluation of the EXOFFIT study.\",\"authors\":\"Mary E Davis, Caitriona Cunningham, Catherine Blake, Gráinne O'Donoghue\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/osp4.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The EXOFFIT study compared the effectiveness of three time-matched exercise interventions in women with obesity for improving cardiorespiratory fitness. To best inform future research, evaluation of the interventions' acceptability is needed. Previous research has been inconsistent with methods and reporting of acceptability. Thus, the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) can be utilized to ensure that all aspects of acceptability are evaluated. No study to date in women with obesity has utilized the TFA in conjunction with quantitative data (i.e., frequencies of themes) to highlight the aspects of interventions that may be most important for participants.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the acceptability of the EXOFFIT program and gain insight into the participants' experience of participation, their perspective on the acceptability of trial procedures and interventions and gather their feedback on program changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach was employed. Thirty-eight participants who completed the exercise interventions were interviewed and completed a self-reported exit questionnaire. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed in three phases: emergent themes were agreed upon, then mapped to the TFA constructs and the frequencies of each construct and theme were presented as counts. Data collected from the exit questionnaire were collated and reported using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All seven TFA constructs were identified in the analysis. The EXOFFIT program was found to have a high level of acceptability, with affective attitude, perceived effectiveness and self-efficacy being the most reported constructs. The burden and opportunity costs associated with the program were mainly related to family commitments and support needed to participate. Any negative impact of participation was noted to be outweighed by the perceived benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study will inform the development of future programs with women with obesity and support the consideration of the TFA constructs from the outset of study design.Clinical Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN13517067.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"e70003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景EXOFFIT 研究比较了三种时间匹配的运动干预措施对肥胖女性改善心肺功能的效果。为了给未来研究提供最佳信息,需要对干预措施的可接受性进行评估。以往的研究在可接受性的方法和报告方面并不一致。因此,可以利用可接受性理论框架(TFA)来确保对可接受性的各个方面进行评估。迄今为止,还没有一项针对女性肥胖症患者的研究将 TFA 与定量数据(即主题频率)结合起来使用,以突出干预措施中可能对参与者最重要的方面:本研究旨在考察 EXOFFIT 项目的可接受性,深入了解参与者的参与体验、他们对试验程序和干预措施可接受性的看法,并收集他们对项目变更的反馈意见:采用混合方法。对完成运动干预的 38 名参与者进行了访谈,并填写了一份自我报告的退出问卷。对访谈内容进行逐字记录,并分三个阶段进行分析:首先就新出现的主题达成一致,然后将其映射到 TFA 构建中,并以计数的形式显示每个构建和主题的频率。对从离职问卷中收集到的数据进行了整理,并使用描述性统计进行了报告:结果:在分析中确定了 TFA 的所有七个结构。研究发现,EXOFFIT 计划具有较高的可接受性,其中情感态度、感知有效性和自我效能是报告最多的构念。与该计划相关的负担和机会成本主要与家庭承诺和参与所需的支持有关。参与计划所带来的任何负面影响都会被所感受到的益处所抵消:本研究的结果将为今后针对肥胖妇女制定计划提供参考,并支持在研究设计之初就考虑 TFA 构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the acceptability of three time-matched exercise interventions for increasing fitness in women living with obesity: A mixed-methods evaluation of the EXOFFIT study.

Background: The EXOFFIT study compared the effectiveness of three time-matched exercise interventions in women with obesity for improving cardiorespiratory fitness. To best inform future research, evaluation of the interventions' acceptability is needed. Previous research has been inconsistent with methods and reporting of acceptability. Thus, the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) can be utilized to ensure that all aspects of acceptability are evaluated. No study to date in women with obesity has utilized the TFA in conjunction with quantitative data (i.e., frequencies of themes) to highlight the aspects of interventions that may be most important for participants.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the acceptability of the EXOFFIT program and gain insight into the participants' experience of participation, their perspective on the acceptability of trial procedures and interventions and gather their feedback on program changes.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed. Thirty-eight participants who completed the exercise interventions were interviewed and completed a self-reported exit questionnaire. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed in three phases: emergent themes were agreed upon, then mapped to the TFA constructs and the frequencies of each construct and theme were presented as counts. Data collected from the exit questionnaire were collated and reported using descriptive statistics.

Results: All seven TFA constructs were identified in the analysis. The EXOFFIT program was found to have a high level of acceptability, with affective attitude, perceived effectiveness and self-efficacy being the most reported constructs. The burden and opportunity costs associated with the program were mainly related to family commitments and support needed to participate. Any negative impact of participation was noted to be outweighed by the perceived benefits.

Conclusions: The results of this study will inform the development of future programs with women with obesity and support the consideration of the TFA constructs from the outset of study design.Clinical Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN13517067.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信