印度牛和水牛阿纳普拉原虫、巴贝斯虫、泰勒虫和锥虫感染的分子检测。

Q3 Immunology and Microbiology
Journal of Parasitic Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1007/s12639-024-01673-3
Syeda Afshan Fatima, Hariprasad Naidu Gonuguntla, Ponnanna Nadikerianda Muthappa, Laxmi Narayan Sarangi
{"title":"印度牛和水牛阿纳普拉原虫、巴贝斯虫、泰勒虫和锥虫感染的分子检测。","authors":"Syeda Afshan Fatima, Hariprasad Naidu Gonuguntla, Ponnanna Nadikerianda Muthappa, Laxmi Narayan Sarangi","doi":"10.1007/s12639-024-01673-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tick-borne pathogens pose a significant global threat, causing substantial economic losses to the dairy industry. In India, tropical theileriosis, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, and trypanosomiasis are major hemo-parasitic diseases affecting bovines. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence of hemo-parasites in different farms in India. PCR assays were employed to detect carrier status, using gene targets <i>msp1b, tams1, rap-1, ama1,</i> and <i>ITS1</i> for <i>A. marginale, T. annulata, B. bovis, B. bigemina,</i> and <i>Trypanosoma</i> species, respectively. Out of the 578 apparently healthy animals screened, 30.45% (95% CI: 26.84-34.32%) were infected with at least one hemo-parasite. Cattle showed an overall positivity of 32.87%, while buffaloes had a prevalence of 15.19%, which was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Interestingly, prevalence was higher in indigenous cattle (47.81%) compared to cross-breeds (25.53%) and exotics (14.62%), with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The prevalence of hemo-parasites varied widely among the farms, ranging from 5.77 to 100%. <i>A. marginale</i> was the most prevalent parasite (23.70% of animals), followed by <i>T. annulata</i> (13.67%), <i>Babesia</i> species (1.90%), and <i>Trypanosoma</i> species (1.56%). Enzootic instability was observed in six of the eight farms, indicating a potential for future outbreaks. Co-infection was detected in 60 out of 176 animals positive for hemo-parasites, with 59 animals co-infected with <i>A. marginale</i> and <i>T. annulata</i>, and only one cross-breed cattle infected with both <i>Anaplasma marginale</i> and <i>Babesia bigemina</i>. The findings highlight the prevalence of hemo-parasites in farms, underscoring the need for whole-herd screening, treatment of infected animals, and improvement in farm management practices to prevent production losses caused by these pathogens.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12639-024-01673-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":16664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parasitic Diseases","volume":"48 3","pages":"450-459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular detection of <i>Anaplasma, Babesia, Theileria</i>, and <i>Trypanosoma</i> infection in cattle and buffaloes in India.\",\"authors\":\"Syeda Afshan Fatima, Hariprasad Naidu Gonuguntla, Ponnanna Nadikerianda Muthappa, Laxmi Narayan Sarangi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12639-024-01673-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tick-borne pathogens pose a significant global threat, causing substantial economic losses to the dairy industry. In India, tropical theileriosis, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, and trypanosomiasis are major hemo-parasitic diseases affecting bovines. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence of hemo-parasites in different farms in India. PCR assays were employed to detect carrier status, using gene targets <i>msp1b, tams1, rap-1, ama1,</i> and <i>ITS1</i> for <i>A. marginale, T. annulata, B. bovis, B. bigemina,</i> and <i>Trypanosoma</i> species, respectively. Out of the 578 apparently healthy animals screened, 30.45% (95% CI: 26.84-34.32%) were infected with at least one hemo-parasite. Cattle showed an overall positivity of 32.87%, while buffaloes had a prevalence of 15.19%, which was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Interestingly, prevalence was higher in indigenous cattle (47.81%) compared to cross-breeds (25.53%) and exotics (14.62%), with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The prevalence of hemo-parasites varied widely among the farms, ranging from 5.77 to 100%. <i>A. marginale</i> was the most prevalent parasite (23.70% of animals), followed by <i>T. annulata</i> (13.67%), <i>Babesia</i> species (1.90%), and <i>Trypanosoma</i> species (1.56%). Enzootic instability was observed in six of the eight farms, indicating a potential for future outbreaks. Co-infection was detected in 60 out of 176 animals positive for hemo-parasites, with 59 animals co-infected with <i>A. marginale</i> and <i>T. annulata</i>, and only one cross-breed cattle infected with both <i>Anaplasma marginale</i> and <i>Babesia bigemina</i>. The findings highlight the prevalence of hemo-parasites in farms, underscoring the need for whole-herd screening, treatment of infected animals, and improvement in farm management practices to prevent production losses caused by these pathogens.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12639-024-01673-3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parasitic Diseases\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"450-459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parasitic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-024-01673-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Immunology and Microbiology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parasitic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-024-01673-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蜱媒病原体对全球构成重大威胁,给奶牛业造成巨大经济损失。在印度,热带蜱病、无形体病、巴贝虫病和锥虫病是影响牛的主要血液寄生虫病。我们进行了一项横断面研究,以确定印度不同牧场中血液寄生虫的流行情况。采用 PCR 检测法检测带原者状况,使用的基因靶标为 msp1b、tams1、rap-1、ama1 和 ITS1,分别检测 A.marginale、T.annulata、B.bovis、B.bigemina 和锥虫。在筛查的 578 头表面健康的动物中,30.45%(95% CI:26.84-34.32%)至少感染了一种血吸虫寄生虫。牛的总体阳性率为 32.87%,而水牛的阳性率为 15.19%,具有显著的统计学意义(p p A. marginale 是最常见的寄生虫(23.70% 的动物),其次是 T. annulata(13.67%)、巴贝斯虫(1.90%)和锥虫(1.56%)。在 8 个农场中,有 6 个农场观察到流行不稳定现象,表明未来可能爆发疫情。在 176 头血液寄生虫检测呈阳性的动物中,有 60 头被检测出合并感染,其中 59 头同时感染了边缘疟原虫和环状疟原虫,只有一头杂交牛同时感染了边缘疟原虫和大肠巴贝西亚原虫。研究结果突显了血吸虫寄生虫在农场中的普遍存在,强调有必要对整个牛群进行筛查,对受感染的动物进行治疗,并改进农场管理方法,以防止这些病原体造成的生产损失:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s12639-024-01673-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Molecular detection of Anaplasma, Babesia, Theileria, and Trypanosoma infection in cattle and buffaloes in India.

Tick-borne pathogens pose a significant global threat, causing substantial economic losses to the dairy industry. In India, tropical theileriosis, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, and trypanosomiasis are major hemo-parasitic diseases affecting bovines. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence of hemo-parasites in different farms in India. PCR assays were employed to detect carrier status, using gene targets msp1b, tams1, rap-1, ama1, and ITS1 for A. marginale, T. annulata, B. bovis, B. bigemina, and Trypanosoma species, respectively. Out of the 578 apparently healthy animals screened, 30.45% (95% CI: 26.84-34.32%) were infected with at least one hemo-parasite. Cattle showed an overall positivity of 32.87%, while buffaloes had a prevalence of 15.19%, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Interestingly, prevalence was higher in indigenous cattle (47.81%) compared to cross-breeds (25.53%) and exotics (14.62%), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). The prevalence of hemo-parasites varied widely among the farms, ranging from 5.77 to 100%. A. marginale was the most prevalent parasite (23.70% of animals), followed by T. annulata (13.67%), Babesia species (1.90%), and Trypanosoma species (1.56%). Enzootic instability was observed in six of the eight farms, indicating a potential for future outbreaks. Co-infection was detected in 60 out of 176 animals positive for hemo-parasites, with 59 animals co-infected with A. marginale and T. annulata, and only one cross-breed cattle infected with both Anaplasma marginale and Babesia bigemina. The findings highlight the prevalence of hemo-parasites in farms, underscoring the need for whole-herd screening, treatment of infected animals, and improvement in farm management practices to prevent production losses caused by these pathogens.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12639-024-01673-3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Parasitic Diseases
Journal of Parasitic Diseases Immunology and Microbiology-Parasitology
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: The primary constituency of the Journal of Parasitic Diseases is parasitology. It publishes original research papers (pure, applied and clinical), which contribute significantly to any area of parasitology. Research papers on various aspects of cellular and molecular parasitology are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信