Mitch J F G Ramaekers, Bastiaan J C Te Kiefte, Bouke P Adriaans, Joe F Juffermans, Hans C van Assen, Bjorn Winkens, Joachim E Wildberger, Hildo J Lamb, Simon Schalla, Jos J M Westenberg
{"title":"使用单一供应商的磁共振系统和单一供应商的软件,对 4D 流磁共振成像进行了全面的性别特异性和年龄依赖性分析,评估了正常受试者的主动脉血流相关参数。","authors":"Mitch J F G Ramaekers, Bastiaan J C Te Kiefte, Bouke P Adriaans, Joe F Juffermans, Hans C van Assen, Bjorn Winkens, Joachim E Wildberger, Hildo J Lamb, Simon Schalla, Jos J M Westenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic blood flow characterization by 4D flow MRI is increasingly performed in aneurysm research. A limited number of studies have established normal values that can aid the recognition of abnormal flow at an early stage. This study aims to establish additional sex-specific and age-dependent reference values for flow-related parameters in a large cohort of healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>212 volunteers were included, and 191 volunteers completed the full study protocol. All underwent 4D flow MRI of the entire aorta. Quantitative values for velocity, vorticity, helicity, as well as total, circumferential, and axial wall shear stress [WSS] were determined for the aortic root [AoR], ascending aorta [AAo], aortic arch [AoA], descending [DAo], suprarenal [SRA], and infrarenal aorta [IRA]. Vorticity and helicity were indexed for segment volume (mL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The normal values were estimated per sex- and age-group, where significant differences between males (M) and females (F) were found only for specific age groups. More specifically, the following variables were significantly different after applying the false discovery rate correction for multiple testing: 1) velocity in the AAo and DAo in the 60-70 years age group (mean±SD: (M) 47.0 ± 8.2cm/s vs. (F) 38.4 ± 6.9cm/s, p=0.001 and, (M) 55.9 ± 9.9cm/s vs. (F) 46.5 ± 5.5cm/s, p=0.002), 2) normalized vorticity in AoR in the 50-59 years age group ((M) 27539 ± 5042s<sup>-1</sup>mL<sup>-1</sup> vs. (F) 30849 ± 7285s<sup>-1</sup>mL<sup>-1</sup>, p=0.002), 3) axial WSS in the Aao in the 18-29 age group ((M) 1098 ± 203 mPa vs. (F) 921 ± 121 mPa, p=0.002). Good to strong negative correlations with age were seen for almost all variables, in different segments, and for both sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study describes reference values for aortic flow-related parameters as acquired by 4D flow MRI. We observed limited differences between males and females. A negative relationship with age was seen for almost all flow-related parameters and segments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive sex-specific and age-dependent analysis of 4D-flow MRI assessed aortic blood flow-related parameters in normal subjects using single-vendor MR systems and single-vendor software.\",\"authors\":\"Mitch J F G Ramaekers, Bastiaan J C Te Kiefte, Bouke P Adriaans, Joe F Juffermans, Hans C van Assen, Bjorn Winkens, Joachim E Wildberger, Hildo J Lamb, Simon Schalla, Jos J M Westenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic blood flow characterization by 4D flow MRI is increasingly performed in aneurysm research. A limited number of studies have established normal values that can aid the recognition of abnormal flow at an early stage. This study aims to establish additional sex-specific and age-dependent reference values for flow-related parameters in a large cohort of healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>212 volunteers were included, and 191 volunteers completed the full study protocol. All underwent 4D flow MRI of the entire aorta. Quantitative values for velocity, vorticity, helicity, as well as total, circumferential, and axial wall shear stress [WSS] were determined for the aortic root [AoR], ascending aorta [AAo], aortic arch [AoA], descending [DAo], suprarenal [SRA], and infrarenal aorta [IRA]. Vorticity and helicity were indexed for segment volume (mL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The normal values were estimated per sex- and age-group, where significant differences between males (M) and females (F) were found only for specific age groups. More specifically, the following variables were significantly different after applying the false discovery rate correction for multiple testing: 1) velocity in the AAo and DAo in the 60-70 years age group (mean±SD: (M) 47.0 ± 8.2cm/s vs. (F) 38.4 ± 6.9cm/s, p=0.001 and, (M) 55.9 ± 9.9cm/s vs. (F) 46.5 ± 5.5cm/s, p=0.002), 2) normalized vorticity in AoR in the 50-59 years age group ((M) 27539 ± 5042s<sup>-1</sup>mL<sup>-1</sup> vs. (F) 30849 ± 7285s<sup>-1</sup>mL<sup>-1</sup>, p=0.002), 3) axial WSS in the Aao in the 18-29 age group ((M) 1098 ± 203 mPa vs. (F) 921 ± 121 mPa, p=0.002). Good to strong negative correlations with age were seen for almost all variables, in different segments, and for both sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study describes reference values for aortic flow-related parameters as acquired by 4D flow MRI. We observed limited differences between males and females. A negative relationship with age was seen for almost all flow-related parameters and segments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101083\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在动脉瘤研究中,越来越多地采用四维血流 MRI 对主动脉血流进行表征。有限的几项研究已经确定了有助于早期识别异常血流的正常值。本研究旨在为一大批健康成年人的血流相关参数建立额外的性别特异性和年龄相关参考值。所有志愿者都接受了整个主动脉的四维血流 MRI 检查。确定了主动脉根部[AoR]、升主动脉[AAo]、主动脉弓[AoA]、降主动脉[DAo]、肾上主动脉[SRA]和肾下主动脉[IRA]的速度、涡度、螺旋度以及总壁剪应力[WSS]、周壁剪应力[WSS]和轴壁剪应力[WSS]的定量值。结果:按性别和年龄组估算了正常值,发现男性(M)和女性(F)之间仅在特定年龄组存在显著差异。更具体地说,在应用多重检验的误发现率校正后,以下变量存在显著差异:1)60-70 岁年龄组 AAo 和 DAo 的速度(平均值±SD:(男)47.0 ± 8.2 厘米/秒 vs. (女)38.4 ± 6.9 厘米/秒,p=0.001;(男)55.9 ± 9.9 厘米/秒 vs. (女)46.5 ± 5.5 厘米/秒,p=0.002),2)50-59 岁年龄组 AoR 中的归一化涡度((男)27539 ± 5042s-1mL-1 vs. (女)30849 ± 7285s-1mL-1,p=0.002),3)18-29 岁年龄组 Aao 中的轴向 WSS((男)1098 ± 203 mPa vs. (女)921 ± 121 mPa,p=0.002)。几乎所有变量、不同节段和男女均与年龄呈良好或强烈的负相关:本研究描述了通过四维血流磁共振成像获得的主动脉血流相关参数的参考值。我们观察到男性和女性之间的差异有限。几乎所有血流相关参数和节段都与年龄呈负相关。
Comprehensive sex-specific and age-dependent analysis of 4D-flow MRI assessed aortic blood flow-related parameters in normal subjects using single-vendor MR systems and single-vendor software.
Background: Aortic blood flow characterization by 4D flow MRI is increasingly performed in aneurysm research. A limited number of studies have established normal values that can aid the recognition of abnormal flow at an early stage. This study aims to establish additional sex-specific and age-dependent reference values for flow-related parameters in a large cohort of healthy adults.
Methods: 212 volunteers were included, and 191 volunteers completed the full study protocol. All underwent 4D flow MRI of the entire aorta. Quantitative values for velocity, vorticity, helicity, as well as total, circumferential, and axial wall shear stress [WSS] were determined for the aortic root [AoR], ascending aorta [AAo], aortic arch [AoA], descending [DAo], suprarenal [SRA], and infrarenal aorta [IRA]. Vorticity and helicity were indexed for segment volume (mL).
Results: The normal values were estimated per sex- and age-group, where significant differences between males (M) and females (F) were found only for specific age groups. More specifically, the following variables were significantly different after applying the false discovery rate correction for multiple testing: 1) velocity in the AAo and DAo in the 60-70 years age group (mean±SD: (M) 47.0 ± 8.2cm/s vs. (F) 38.4 ± 6.9cm/s, p=0.001 and, (M) 55.9 ± 9.9cm/s vs. (F) 46.5 ± 5.5cm/s, p=0.002), 2) normalized vorticity in AoR in the 50-59 years age group ((M) 27539 ± 5042s-1mL-1 vs. (F) 30849 ± 7285s-1mL-1, p=0.002), 3) axial WSS in the Aao in the 18-29 age group ((M) 1098 ± 203 mPa vs. (F) 921 ± 121 mPa, p=0.002). Good to strong negative correlations with age were seen for almost all variables, in different segments, and for both sexes.
Conclusion: This study describes reference values for aortic flow-related parameters as acquired by 4D flow MRI. We observed limited differences between males and females. A negative relationship with age was seen for almost all flow-related parameters and segments.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to:
New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system.
New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis.
Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR.
Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.