费雪的自交优势并不适用于一夫一妻制物种。

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Pierre-Olivier Cheptou
{"title":"费雪的自交优势并不适用于一夫一妻制物种。","authors":"Pierre-Olivier Cheptou","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>In hermaphroditic plants, the evolution of self-fertilization is driven by two major forces; the cost of outcrossing or Fisher's automatic advantage of selfing and inbreeding depression. Seminal theoretical works have established that an inbreeding depression threshold of 0.5 governs the evolution. Below that threshold, selfing evolves, above that, outcrossing evolves. Does this threshold apply to cleistogamous plants?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>I developed a model using a Lloydian approach to analyze the evolution of cleistogamy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>I showed that the inbreeding depression threshold does not apply in cleistogamous species, and that because cleistogamous (closed) flowers do not export pollen, Fisher's advantage of selfing is totally cancelled.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In line with model predictions, I discuss the fact that cleistogamous species often exhibit low inbreeding depression in empirical studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fisher's automatic advantage of self-fertilization does not apply in cleistogamous species\",\"authors\":\"Pierre-Olivier Cheptou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajb2.16390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Premise</h3>\\n \\n <p>In hermaphroditic plants, the evolution of self-fertilization is driven by two major forces; the cost of outcrossing or Fisher's automatic advantage of selfing and inbreeding depression. Seminal theoretical works have established that an inbreeding depression threshold of 0.5 governs the evolution. Below that threshold, selfing evolves, above that, outcrossing evolves. Does this threshold apply to cleistogamous plants?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>I developed a model using a Lloydian approach to analyze the evolution of cleistogamy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>I showed that the inbreeding depression threshold does not apply in cleistogamous species, and that because cleistogamous (closed) flowers do not export pollen, Fisher's advantage of selfing is totally cancelled.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In line with model predictions, I discuss the fact that cleistogamous species often exhibit low inbreeding depression in empirical studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16390\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前提:在雌雄同体植物中,自交的进化主要受两种力量的驱动:外交的成本或费希尔自交的自动优势以及近交抑制。重要的理论著作已经确定,0.5 的近交抑郁阈值控制着进化。低于该阈值,自交进化,高于该阈值,外交进化。这个阈值是否适用于裂殖植物?我用劳埃德方法建立了一个模型来分析裂殖进化:结果:我发现近交抑郁阈值不适用于裂殖物种,而且由于裂殖(封闭)花不输出花粉,费雪的自交优势被完全抵消:根据模型预测,我讨论了在实证研究中,裂殖物种通常表现出较低的近交抑郁这一事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fisher's automatic advantage of self-fertilization does not apply in cleistogamous species

Premise

In hermaphroditic plants, the evolution of self-fertilization is driven by two major forces; the cost of outcrossing or Fisher's automatic advantage of selfing and inbreeding depression. Seminal theoretical works have established that an inbreeding depression threshold of 0.5 governs the evolution. Below that threshold, selfing evolves, above that, outcrossing evolves. Does this threshold apply to cleistogamous plants?

Methods

I developed a model using a Lloydian approach to analyze the evolution of cleistogamy.

Results

I showed that the inbreeding depression threshold does not apply in cleistogamous species, and that because cleistogamous (closed) flowers do not export pollen, Fisher's advantage of selfing is totally cancelled.

Conclusions

In line with model predictions, I discuss the fact that cleistogamous species often exhibit low inbreeding depression in empirical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信