研究麻痘(猴痘)风险因素和疫苗有效性的阴性试验设计注意事项。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Isaac Núñez
{"title":"研究麻痘(猴痘)风险因素和疫苗有效性的阴性试验设计注意事项。","authors":"Isaac Núñez","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The test-negative design (TND) has been commonly used to study vaccine effectiveness (notably regarding COVID-19 and influenza vaccines) and recently has been proposed as a valid design to study causal risk factors of diseases during an outbreak. In April 2022, there was a worldwide outbreak of mpox (formerly called monkeypox) that resulted in an international public health emergency. The TND has been used in a few studies to investigate vaccine effectiveness and risk factors of mpox, using epidemiologic databases. However, several issues prevent such a study design from being valid for this purpose. Problems stem from stigma surrounding mpox, which affects a person's decision to seek health care. This poses a challenge to the similar health care-seeking behavior assumption that is central for test-negative studies. Further limitations include the differential diagnoses of mpox, which have notable differences from mpox that may be easily detected by clinicians or patients but are unlikely to be included in epidemiologic databases or electronic health records. Herein, the caveats regarding the use of the TND are discussed in the context of the mpox outbreak, as well as potential steps that may allow it to be used effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"908-912"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caveats regarding the test-negative design to study mpox risk factors and vaccine effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Núñez\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwae284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The test-negative design (TND) has been commonly used to study vaccine effectiveness (notably regarding COVID-19 and influenza vaccines) and recently has been proposed as a valid design to study causal risk factors of diseases during an outbreak. In April 2022, there was a worldwide outbreak of mpox (formerly called monkeypox) that resulted in an international public health emergency. The TND has been used in a few studies to investigate vaccine effectiveness and risk factors of mpox, using epidemiologic databases. However, several issues prevent such a study design from being valid for this purpose. Problems stem from stigma surrounding mpox, which affects a person's decision to seek health care. This poses a challenge to the similar health care-seeking behavior assumption that is central for test-negative studies. Further limitations include the differential diagnoses of mpox, which have notable differences from mpox that may be easily detected by clinicians or patients but are unlikely to be included in epidemiologic databases or electronic health records. Herein, the caveats regarding the use of the TND are discussed in the context of the mpox outbreak, as well as potential steps that may allow it to be used effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"908-912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae284\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

试验阴性设计(TND)通常用于研究疫苗的有效性(特别是 COVID-19 和流感疫苗),最近又被提议作为研究疾病爆发期间因果风险因素的有效设计。2022 年 4 月,麻痘(原猴痘)在全球范围内爆发,导致国际公共卫生紧急状况。TND可用于利用流行病学数据库研究疫苗的有效性和天花的风险因素,目前已有一些研究完成了这项工作。然而,有几个问题阻碍了此类研究设计的有效性。这些问题源于人们对水痘的成见,这种成见影响了人们寻求医疗保健的决定。这对作为阴性试验研究核心的 "类似的医疗保健寻求行为 "假设提出了挑战。其他局限性还包括水痘的鉴别诊断,这些鉴别诊断与水痘有明显不同,临床医生或患者可能很容易发现,但却不太可能被纳入流行病学数据库或电子健康记录中。在此,我将讨论在天花疫情中使用 TND 的注意事项,以及有效使用 TND 的潜在步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Caveats regarding the test-negative design to study mpox risk factors and vaccine effectiveness.

The test-negative design (TND) has been commonly used to study vaccine effectiveness (notably regarding COVID-19 and influenza vaccines) and recently has been proposed as a valid design to study causal risk factors of diseases during an outbreak. In April 2022, there was a worldwide outbreak of mpox (formerly called monkeypox) that resulted in an international public health emergency. The TND has been used in a few studies to investigate vaccine effectiveness and risk factors of mpox, using epidemiologic databases. However, several issues prevent such a study design from being valid for this purpose. Problems stem from stigma surrounding mpox, which affects a person's decision to seek health care. This poses a challenge to the similar health care-seeking behavior assumption that is central for test-negative studies. Further limitations include the differential diagnoses of mpox, which have notable differences from mpox that may be easily detected by clinicians or patients but are unlikely to be included in epidemiologic databases or electronic health records. Herein, the caveats regarding the use of the TND are discussed in the context of the mpox outbreak, as well as potential steps that may allow it to be used effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信