Ana Sofía Monroy-Sais , Daniel Tobin , Mauricio R. Bellon , Marta Astier , Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo , Nancy Gálvez-Reyes , Alicia Mastretta-Yanes , Jorge Ruiz-Arocho , Ana Wegier , Yolanda H. Chen
{"title":"小农在玉米品种保护中的不同价值观:墨西哥恰帕斯州的案例研究","authors":"Ana Sofía Monroy-Sais , Daniel Tobin , Mauricio R. Bellon , Marta Astier , Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo , Nancy Gálvez-Reyes , Alicia Mastretta-Yanes , Jorge Ruiz-Arocho , Ana Wegier , Yolanda H. Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conservation of maize landraces in the Mexico center of origin is critical for sustainable agriculture. However, farmers in many regions of Mexico are reducing landraces for more modern maize varieties, particularly hybrid maize. The reasons why farmers choose to maintain maize landraces have been recently recognized to be strongly linked to their specific values (i.e., intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values). However, there is a lack of studies that empirically investigate the nuances of farmers' specific values and how these values are adequately considered in broad agricultural policies. Using a mixed-methods case study based in indigenous and <em>mestizo</em> communities in Chiapas, Mexico, we analyzed farmers' maize production strategies, how those strategies connect to farmers’ value orientations, and the limitations that they confront in enacting such values. We found that households within both indigenous and <em>mestizo</em> communities fell into one of three categories regarding their maize production: 1) hybrid maize production for market sales, 2) landrace production for household consumption, and 3) a combination of these two strategies. All farmers hold a diversity of values in which mostly instrumental and relational values were mentioned among the three groups of farmers, who emphasized the livelihood and subsistence value of maize. Value differences for farmers who prioritize the cultivation of maize landraces were related to the strength of relational values, such as the biocultural diversity and heritage value of maize. In contrast, the farmers relying on hybrid varieties were the ones confronting the most limitations to their maize production, particularly economic limitations. Based on our empirical findings, we conclude that policies aimed at promoting the conservation of landraces must extend beyond a purely economic and market-oriented approach. The current policy emphasis on instrumental values is likely to fall short in achieving the desired outcomes since it does not sufficiently foster plural values that underpin the continued production of maize landraces.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 103347"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smallholder farmers’ diverse values in maize landrace conservation: A case study from Chiapas, Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Ana Sofía Monroy-Sais , Daniel Tobin , Mauricio R. Bellon , Marta Astier , Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo , Nancy Gálvez-Reyes , Alicia Mastretta-Yanes , Jorge Ruiz-Arocho , Ana Wegier , Yolanda H. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Conservation of maize landraces in the Mexico center of origin is critical for sustainable agriculture. However, farmers in many regions of Mexico are reducing landraces for more modern maize varieties, particularly hybrid maize. The reasons why farmers choose to maintain maize landraces have been recently recognized to be strongly linked to their specific values (i.e., intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values). However, there is a lack of studies that empirically investigate the nuances of farmers' specific values and how these values are adequately considered in broad agricultural policies. Using a mixed-methods case study based in indigenous and <em>mestizo</em> communities in Chiapas, Mexico, we analyzed farmers' maize production strategies, how those strategies connect to farmers’ value orientations, and the limitations that they confront in enacting such values. We found that households within both indigenous and <em>mestizo</em> communities fell into one of three categories regarding their maize production: 1) hybrid maize production for market sales, 2) landrace production for household consumption, and 3) a combination of these two strategies. All farmers hold a diversity of values in which mostly instrumental and relational values were mentioned among the three groups of farmers, who emphasized the livelihood and subsistence value of maize. Value differences for farmers who prioritize the cultivation of maize landraces were related to the strength of relational values, such as the biocultural diversity and heritage value of maize. In contrast, the farmers relying on hybrid varieties were the ones confronting the most limitations to their maize production, particularly economic limitations. Based on our empirical findings, we conclude that policies aimed at promoting the conservation of landraces must extend beyond a purely economic and market-oriented approach. The current policy emphasis on instrumental values is likely to fall short in achieving the desired outcomes since it does not sufficiently foster plural values that underpin the continued production of maize landraces.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724001517\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724001517","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Smallholder farmers’ diverse values in maize landrace conservation: A case study from Chiapas, Mexico
Conservation of maize landraces in the Mexico center of origin is critical for sustainable agriculture. However, farmers in many regions of Mexico are reducing landraces for more modern maize varieties, particularly hybrid maize. The reasons why farmers choose to maintain maize landraces have been recently recognized to be strongly linked to their specific values (i.e., intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values). However, there is a lack of studies that empirically investigate the nuances of farmers' specific values and how these values are adequately considered in broad agricultural policies. Using a mixed-methods case study based in indigenous and mestizo communities in Chiapas, Mexico, we analyzed farmers' maize production strategies, how those strategies connect to farmers’ value orientations, and the limitations that they confront in enacting such values. We found that households within both indigenous and mestizo communities fell into one of three categories regarding their maize production: 1) hybrid maize production for market sales, 2) landrace production for household consumption, and 3) a combination of these two strategies. All farmers hold a diversity of values in which mostly instrumental and relational values were mentioned among the three groups of farmers, who emphasized the livelihood and subsistence value of maize. Value differences for farmers who prioritize the cultivation of maize landraces were related to the strength of relational values, such as the biocultural diversity and heritage value of maize. In contrast, the farmers relying on hybrid varieties were the ones confronting the most limitations to their maize production, particularly economic limitations. Based on our empirical findings, we conclude that policies aimed at promoting the conservation of landraces must extend beyond a purely economic and market-oriented approach. The current policy emphasis on instrumental values is likely to fall short in achieving the desired outcomes since it does not sufficiently foster plural values that underpin the continued production of maize landraces.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.