Anne C. Richer-de-Forges , Dominique Arrouays , Budiman Minasny
{"title":"设计适应性强的土壤定义的简易构件","authors":"Anne C. Richer-de-Forges , Dominique Arrouays , Budiman Minasny","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We provide six short building blocks to devise adaptable soil definitions. These buiding blocks start from a simple and straightforward metaphor and progressively evolve when adopting geophysical, analytical, biogeochemical, cultural, and services-driven points of view. These progressive changes end up with a straightforward, yet most important message for a broad audience. We discuss these building blocks by comparing them to recently proposed soil definitions. Our aims are to initiate a debate on i) what should be, or should not be named soil, ii) what a soil definition should be, iii) the need for both a generic definition and a set of adaptable definitions, based on building blocks, commonly accepted by soil scientists, and iv) the need to adapt our language to diverse audiences. Finally, we propose a definition in one sentence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000406/pdfft?md5=7e4a0695b02bf782caeb3a22c4bff92e&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000406-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short building blocks to devise adaptable soil definitions\",\"authors\":\"Anne C. Richer-de-Forges , Dominique Arrouays , Budiman Minasny\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We provide six short building blocks to devise adaptable soil definitions. These buiding blocks start from a simple and straightforward metaphor and progressively evolve when adopting geophysical, analytical, biogeochemical, cultural, and services-driven points of view. These progressive changes end up with a straightforward, yet most important message for a broad audience. We discuss these building blocks by comparing them to recently proposed soil definitions. Our aims are to initiate a debate on i) what should be, or should not be named soil, ii) what a soil definition should be, iii) the need for both a generic definition and a set of adaptable definitions, based on building blocks, commonly accepted by soil scientists, and iv) the need to adapt our language to diverse audiences. Finally, we propose a definition in one sentence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil security\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000406/pdfft?md5=7e4a0695b02bf782caeb3a22c4bff92e&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000406-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Short building blocks to devise adaptable soil definitions
We provide six short building blocks to devise adaptable soil definitions. These buiding blocks start from a simple and straightforward metaphor and progressively evolve when adopting geophysical, analytical, biogeochemical, cultural, and services-driven points of view. These progressive changes end up with a straightforward, yet most important message for a broad audience. We discuss these building blocks by comparing them to recently proposed soil definitions. Our aims are to initiate a debate on i) what should be, or should not be named soil, ii) what a soil definition should be, iii) the need for both a generic definition and a set of adaptable definitions, based on building blocks, commonly accepted by soil scientists, and iv) the need to adapt our language to diverse audiences. Finally, we propose a definition in one sentence.