外阴癌前病变切除术中的预防性抗生素:随机对照试验

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mary M. Mullen , Whitney R. Grither , Hannah Millimet , David G. Mutch , Andrea R. Hagemann , Carolyn K. McCourt , Matthew A. Powell , Premal H.Thaker , Dineo Khabele , Lindsay M. Kuroki
{"title":"外阴癌前病变切除术中的预防性抗生素:随机对照试验","authors":"Mary M. Mullen ,&nbsp;Whitney R. Grither ,&nbsp;Hannah Millimet ,&nbsp;David G. Mutch ,&nbsp;Andrea R. Hagemann ,&nbsp;Carolyn K. McCourt ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Powell ,&nbsp;Premal H.Thaker ,&nbsp;Dineo Khabele ,&nbsp;Lindsay M. Kuroki","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>No prospective data have been described to inform guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for partial vulvectomies. Thus, we conducted a single-center, pilot, double-blind randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent wound complications after partial vulvectomies. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to preoperative antibiotics or no preoperative antibiotics. The primary outcome of 30-day postoperative wound complications occurred in 31 (62 %) of all patients, with no differences between groups. The most common wound complications were superficial separation (54.2 % antibiotic prophylaxis vs. 65.3 % no prophylaxis, p = 0.37) and surgical site infection (0 % antibiotic prophylaxis vs 7.7 % no prophylaxis, p = 0.49). However, this study was limited by differences in patient characteristics between the groups. This study provides data to perform power calculations for a trial examining the effect of preoperative antibiotics on surgical site infection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001553/pdfft?md5=6e7327dc9de5e415f8438971d9958abd&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001553-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic antibiotics for excision of premalignant vulvar lesions: A pilot randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Mary M. Mullen ,&nbsp;Whitney R. Grither ,&nbsp;Hannah Millimet ,&nbsp;David G. Mutch ,&nbsp;Andrea R. Hagemann ,&nbsp;Carolyn K. McCourt ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Powell ,&nbsp;Premal H.Thaker ,&nbsp;Dineo Khabele ,&nbsp;Lindsay M. Kuroki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>No prospective data have been described to inform guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for partial vulvectomies. Thus, we conducted a single-center, pilot, double-blind randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent wound complications after partial vulvectomies. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to preoperative antibiotics or no preoperative antibiotics. The primary outcome of 30-day postoperative wound complications occurred in 31 (62 %) of all patients, with no differences between groups. The most common wound complications were superficial separation (54.2 % antibiotic prophylaxis vs. 65.3 % no prophylaxis, p = 0.37) and surgical site infection (0 % antibiotic prophylaxis vs 7.7 % no prophylaxis, p = 0.49). However, this study was limited by differences in patient characteristics between the groups. This study provides data to perform power calculations for a trial examining the effect of preoperative antibiotics on surgical site infection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001553/pdfft?md5=6e7327dc9de5e415f8438971d9958abd&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001553-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前还没有前瞻性数据可为外阴部分切除术的抗生素预防指南提供参考。因此,我们进行了一项单中心、试验性、双盲随机对照试验,以评估预防性抗生素对外阴部分切除术后伤口并发症的预防效果。患者按 1:1 随机分配到术前使用抗生素或术前不使用抗生素。所有患者中有31人(62%)出现术后30天伤口并发症这一主要结果,组间无差异。最常见的伤口并发症是表皮分离(54.2% 使用抗生素预防与 65.3% 不使用预防,P = 0.37)和手术部位感染(0% 使用抗生素预防与 7.7% 不使用预防,P = 0.49)。然而,由于两组患者的特征存在差异,这项研究受到了限制。本研究提供的数据可用于对术前抗生素对手术部位感染影响的试验进行功率计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prophylactic antibiotics for excision of premalignant vulvar lesions: A pilot randomized controlled trial

No prospective data have been described to inform guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for partial vulvectomies. Thus, we conducted a single-center, pilot, double-blind randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent wound complications after partial vulvectomies. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to preoperative antibiotics or no preoperative antibiotics. The primary outcome of 30-day postoperative wound complications occurred in 31 (62 %) of all patients, with no differences between groups. The most common wound complications were superficial separation (54.2 % antibiotic prophylaxis vs. 65.3 % no prophylaxis, p = 0.37) and surgical site infection (0 % antibiotic prophylaxis vs 7.7 % no prophylaxis, p = 0.49). However, this study was limited by differences in patient characteristics between the groups. This study provides data to perform power calculations for a trial examining the effect of preoperative antibiotics on surgical site infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信