妇产科中的再生医学:日本再生医学安全法的现状

IF 3.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Satoshi Hosoya , Sena Awano-Kim , Ryo Yokomizo , Yuichiro Ukon , Kazuki Morita , Yuta Kasahara , Hiroshi Kishi , Aikou Okamoto
{"title":"妇产科中的再生医学:日本再生医学安全法的现状","authors":"Satoshi Hosoya ,&nbsp;Sena Awano-Kim ,&nbsp;Ryo Yokomizo ,&nbsp;Yuichiro Ukon ,&nbsp;Kazuki Morita ,&nbsp;Yuta Kasahara ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kishi ,&nbsp;Aikou Okamoto","doi":"10.1016/j.reth.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>While the provision of unapproved regenerative medicine has been problematic worldwide, few studies have examined the implementation status of regenerative medicine (RM) in the specific field. This study aimed to determine the current status of therapy and clinical research in the obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) in Japan under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (RM Act).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Detailed data were extracted from publicly available websites provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. We extracted descriptive details, including risk classification of the RM Act, modality, target disease, locality, institution, and administration route. For therapy, the price for each modality was evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The total number of therapeutic provision plans in OBGYN (1.9% of RM in Japan) are classified as Class II (moderate) risk. Most were administered in clinics in urban areas for treating endometrial or ovarian infertility by locally administering platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The price using MSCs is approximately eight times more expensive that of those involving PRP (1832.1 ± 1139.8 vs 240.8 ± 106.5 thousand yen, p &lt; 0.0001). Regarding research, four plans (2.2%) were submitted to target implantation failure and advanced gynecological cancer using autologous lymphocytes, dendritic cells, or MSCs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The RM Act permits knowledge of the current status of regenerative medicine even for unapproved uses in a specific clinical field. The study findings shall prompt a worldwide discussion regarding the required regulations for therapy and clinical research of RM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20895,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 564-570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424001391/pdfft?md5=03dca65353bf40aa19ebdbb6e87d1e11&pid=1-s2.0-S2352320424001391-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regenerative medicine in Obstetrics & Gynecology: Current status under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Hosoya ,&nbsp;Sena Awano-Kim ,&nbsp;Ryo Yokomizo ,&nbsp;Yuichiro Ukon ,&nbsp;Kazuki Morita ,&nbsp;Yuta Kasahara ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kishi ,&nbsp;Aikou Okamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reth.2024.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>While the provision of unapproved regenerative medicine has been problematic worldwide, few studies have examined the implementation status of regenerative medicine (RM) in the specific field. This study aimed to determine the current status of therapy and clinical research in the obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) in Japan under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (RM Act).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Detailed data were extracted from publicly available websites provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. We extracted descriptive details, including risk classification of the RM Act, modality, target disease, locality, institution, and administration route. For therapy, the price for each modality was evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The total number of therapeutic provision plans in OBGYN (1.9% of RM in Japan) are classified as Class II (moderate) risk. Most were administered in clinics in urban areas for treating endometrial or ovarian infertility by locally administering platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The price using MSCs is approximately eight times more expensive that of those involving PRP (1832.1 ± 1139.8 vs 240.8 ± 106.5 thousand yen, p &lt; 0.0001). Regarding research, four plans (2.2%) were submitted to target implantation failure and advanced gynecological cancer using autologous lymphocytes, dendritic cells, or MSCs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The RM Act permits knowledge of the current status of regenerative medicine even for unapproved uses in a specific clinical field. The study findings shall prompt a worldwide discussion regarding the required regulations for therapy and clinical research of RM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regenerative Therapy\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 564-570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424001391/pdfft?md5=03dca65353bf40aa19ebdbb6e87d1e11&pid=1-s2.0-S2352320424001391-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regenerative Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424001391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424001391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言虽然提供未经批准的再生医学在世界范围内一直是个问题,但很少有研究对再生医学(RM)在特定领域的实施状况进行调查。本研究旨在根据《再生医学安全法》(RM 法)确定日本妇产科(OBGYN)的治疗和临床研究现状。方法从厚生劳动省提供的公开网站上提取详细数据。我们提取了描述性细节,包括《再生医学法案》的风险分类、模式、目标疾病、地区、机构和给药途径。结果妇产科的治疗供应计划(占日本 RM 的 1.9%)被归类为二级(中度)风险。大多数计划在城市地区的诊所实施,通过局部注射富血小板血浆(PRP)或自体间充质干细胞(MSCs)治疗子宫内膜或卵巢不孕症。使用间充质干细胞的价格大约是使用富血小板血浆价格的八倍(1832.1 ± 1139.8 vs 240.8 ± 106.5 万日元,p < 0.0001)。在研究方面,提交了四项计划(2.2%),使用自体淋巴细胞、树突状细胞或间叶干细胞,针对植入失败和晚期妇科癌症进行研究。研究结果将促使全世界就再生医学治疗和临床研究的必要法规展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regenerative medicine in Obstetrics & Gynecology: Current status under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine in Japan

Introduction

While the provision of unapproved regenerative medicine has been problematic worldwide, few studies have examined the implementation status of regenerative medicine (RM) in the specific field. This study aimed to determine the current status of therapy and clinical research in the obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) in Japan under the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (RM Act).

Methods

Detailed data were extracted from publicly available websites provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. We extracted descriptive details, including risk classification of the RM Act, modality, target disease, locality, institution, and administration route. For therapy, the price for each modality was evaluated.

Results

The total number of therapeutic provision plans in OBGYN (1.9% of RM in Japan) are classified as Class II (moderate) risk. Most were administered in clinics in urban areas for treating endometrial or ovarian infertility by locally administering platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The price using MSCs is approximately eight times more expensive that of those involving PRP (1832.1 ± 1139.8 vs 240.8 ± 106.5 thousand yen, p < 0.0001). Regarding research, four plans (2.2%) were submitted to target implantation failure and advanced gynecological cancer using autologous lymphocytes, dendritic cells, or MSCs.

Conclusion

The RM Act permits knowledge of the current status of regenerative medicine even for unapproved uses in a specific clinical field. The study findings shall prompt a worldwide discussion regarding the required regulations for therapy and clinical research of RM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Regenerative Therapy
Regenerative Therapy Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Regenerative Therapy is the official peer-reviewed online journal of the Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine. Regenerative Therapy is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes original articles and reviews of basic research, clinical translation, industrial development, and regulatory issues focusing on stem cell biology, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信