慢性钙化性胰腺炎合并糖尿病的血糖变异性及其可能的决定因素

IF 4.3 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Amarta Shankar Chowdhury , Rajan Palui , Subhodip Pramanik , Sunetra Mondal
{"title":"慢性钙化性胰腺炎合并糖尿病的血糖变异性及其可能的决定因素","authors":"Amarta Shankar Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Rajan Palui ,&nbsp;Subhodip Pramanik ,&nbsp;Sunetra Mondal","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To study glycemic patterns and variability in patients with pancreatic diabetes or type 3c Diabetes mellitus (DM) due to chronic pancreatitis and its subtypes and assess the role of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in modulating glycemic variability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients having type 3c DM due to chronic pancreatitis, and on insulin underwent Flash continuous-glucose-monitoring (CGM) for 14 days. Parameters were compared between patients with fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD) and non-FCPD-chronic calcific pancreatitis (non-FCPD) and between the recipients and non-recipients of pancreatic enzyme-replacement-therapy (ERT).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 54 patients with pancreatic diabetes, 35 patients had chronic calcific pancreatitis. They underwent CGM, median HbA1c 9.20 % (77 mmol/mol) and mean Time-In-Range (TIR) being 41.21 % (23.48). Only 5 (15.2 %) patients achieved target TIR&gt;70 % while 16 (48.5 %) patients had high glycemic-variability [Coefficient-of-variation (CV) &gt; 36 %]. Patients with FCPD (n = 14) had higher hypoglycemia-indices like Time-Below-Range (18.92 % vs 8.20 %; p = 0.03) and Low-Blood-Glucose-Index (18.14 % vs 6.04 %; p = 0.02) compared to non-FCPD (n = 21). HbA1c% and hyperglycemic excursions were similar in both groups. Recipients of ERT (n = 20) had lower glycemic-variability [Standard Deviation (SD) 52.15 % vs 68.14 % and CV 32.59 % vs 41.79 %, p &lt; 0.05 for both) than non-recipients. ERT-recipients had no serious hypoglycemia within the 14 days. On subgroup analysis, lower glycemic-variability and hypoglycemia with ERT were seen only in FCPD but not in non-FCPD subgroup (50.13 vs 77.91, 30.09 vs 48.36 for SD and CV respectively, p &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with type 3c DM due to chronic pancreatitis have high frequency of hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic excursions, with those with FCPD having a particularly higher risk of hypoglycemia and glycemic-variability. Those receiving pancreatic ERT had lesser glycemic variability and hypoglycemia. The small sample size and lack of objective markers of documentation of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency like fecal elastase highlight the need for further larger studies in this field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":"18 8","pages":"Article 103100"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glycemic variability in chronic calcific pancreatitis with diabetes mellitus and its possible determinants\",\"authors\":\"Amarta Shankar Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Rajan Palui ,&nbsp;Subhodip Pramanik ,&nbsp;Sunetra Mondal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To study glycemic patterns and variability in patients with pancreatic diabetes or type 3c Diabetes mellitus (DM) due to chronic pancreatitis and its subtypes and assess the role of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in modulating glycemic variability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients having type 3c DM due to chronic pancreatitis, and on insulin underwent Flash continuous-glucose-monitoring (CGM) for 14 days. Parameters were compared between patients with fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD) and non-FCPD-chronic calcific pancreatitis (non-FCPD) and between the recipients and non-recipients of pancreatic enzyme-replacement-therapy (ERT).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 54 patients with pancreatic diabetes, 35 patients had chronic calcific pancreatitis. They underwent CGM, median HbA1c 9.20 % (77 mmol/mol) and mean Time-In-Range (TIR) being 41.21 % (23.48). Only 5 (15.2 %) patients achieved target TIR&gt;70 % while 16 (48.5 %) patients had high glycemic-variability [Coefficient-of-variation (CV) &gt; 36 %]. Patients with FCPD (n = 14) had higher hypoglycemia-indices like Time-Below-Range (18.92 % vs 8.20 %; p = 0.03) and Low-Blood-Glucose-Index (18.14 % vs 6.04 %; p = 0.02) compared to non-FCPD (n = 21). HbA1c% and hyperglycemic excursions were similar in both groups. Recipients of ERT (n = 20) had lower glycemic-variability [Standard Deviation (SD) 52.15 % vs 68.14 % and CV 32.59 % vs 41.79 %, p &lt; 0.05 for both) than non-recipients. ERT-recipients had no serious hypoglycemia within the 14 days. On subgroup analysis, lower glycemic-variability and hypoglycemia with ERT were seen only in FCPD but not in non-FCPD subgroup (50.13 vs 77.91, 30.09 vs 48.36 for SD and CV respectively, p &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with type 3c DM due to chronic pancreatitis have high frequency of hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic excursions, with those with FCPD having a particularly higher risk of hypoglycemia and glycemic-variability. Those receiving pancreatic ERT had lesser glycemic variability and hypoglycemia. The small sample size and lack of objective markers of documentation of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency like fecal elastase highlight the need for further larger studies in this field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 103100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124001619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124001619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究慢性胰腺炎引起的胰源性糖尿病或 3c 型糖尿病(DM)患者及其亚型的血糖模式和变异性,并评估胰酶替代疗法(ERT)在调节血糖变异性方面的作用。方法对慢性胰腺炎引起的 3c 型 DM 患者和使用胰岛素的患者进行为期 14 天的 Flash 连续血糖监测(CGM)。比较了纤维钙化性胰腺糖尿病(FCPD)和非纤维钙化性胰腺糖尿病-慢性钙化性胰腺炎(Non-FCPD)患者之间以及接受和未接受胰酶替代疗法(ERT)患者之间的参数。他们接受了 CGM 检查,中位 HbA1c 为 9.20 %(77 mmol/mol),平均时间范围(TIR)为 41.21 %(23.48)。只有 5 例(15.2%)患者的 TIR 达到了目标值 70%,16 例(48.5%)患者的血糖变异性较高(变异系数为 36%)。与非 FCPD 患者(21 人)相比,FCPD 患者(14 人)的低血糖指数较高,如时间低于范围指数(18.92 % vs 8.20 %;p = 0.03)和低血糖指数(18.14 % vs 6.04 %;p = 0.02)。两组的 HbA1c% 和高血糖偏移量相似。接受 ERT 治疗者(20 人)的血糖变异性[标准差(SD)为 52.15 % vs 68.14 %,CV 为 32.59 % vs 41.79 %,P 均为 0.05]低于非接受 ERT 治疗者。ERT 受试者在 14 天内没有发生严重低血糖。在亚组分析中,只有 FCPD 亚组的血糖变异性和低血糖症发生率较低,而非 FCPD 亚组的发生率较低(SD 和 CV 分别为 50.13 vs 77.91、30.09 vs 48.36,P < 0.05)。结论慢性胰腺炎导致的 3c 型 DM 患者发生高血糖和低血糖的频率很高,其中 FCPD 患者发生低血糖和血糖变异的风险尤其高。接受胰腺 ERT 治疗的患者血糖变异性和低血糖发生率较低。由于样本量较小,且缺乏记录胰腺外分泌功能不全的客观指标(如粪便弹性蛋白酶),因此需要在该领域开展更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glycemic variability in chronic calcific pancreatitis with diabetes mellitus and its possible determinants

Aims

To study glycemic patterns and variability in patients with pancreatic diabetes or type 3c Diabetes mellitus (DM) due to chronic pancreatitis and its subtypes and assess the role of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in modulating glycemic variability.

Methods

Patients having type 3c DM due to chronic pancreatitis, and on insulin underwent Flash continuous-glucose-monitoring (CGM) for 14 days. Parameters were compared between patients with fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD) and non-FCPD-chronic calcific pancreatitis (non-FCPD) and between the recipients and non-recipients of pancreatic enzyme-replacement-therapy (ERT).

Results

Out of 54 patients with pancreatic diabetes, 35 patients had chronic calcific pancreatitis. They underwent CGM, median HbA1c 9.20 % (77 mmol/mol) and mean Time-In-Range (TIR) being 41.21 % (23.48). Only 5 (15.2 %) patients achieved target TIR>70 % while 16 (48.5 %) patients had high glycemic-variability [Coefficient-of-variation (CV) > 36 %]. Patients with FCPD (n = 14) had higher hypoglycemia-indices like Time-Below-Range (18.92 % vs 8.20 %; p = 0.03) and Low-Blood-Glucose-Index (18.14 % vs 6.04 %; p = 0.02) compared to non-FCPD (n = 21). HbA1c% and hyperglycemic excursions were similar in both groups. Recipients of ERT (n = 20) had lower glycemic-variability [Standard Deviation (SD) 52.15 % vs 68.14 % and CV 32.59 % vs 41.79 %, p < 0.05 for both) than non-recipients. ERT-recipients had no serious hypoglycemia within the 14 days. On subgroup analysis, lower glycemic-variability and hypoglycemia with ERT were seen only in FCPD but not in non-FCPD subgroup (50.13 vs 77.91, 30.09 vs 48.36 for SD and CV respectively, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with type 3c DM due to chronic pancreatitis have high frequency of hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic excursions, with those with FCPD having a particularly higher risk of hypoglycemia and glycemic-variability. Those receiving pancreatic ERT had lesser glycemic variability and hypoglycemia. The small sample size and lack of objective markers of documentation of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency like fecal elastase highlight the need for further larger studies in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care. Types of Publications: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信