增强住院糖尿病患者的能力:在全院范围内实施胰岛素剂量电子病历集成验证 CGM 政策。

Diabetes care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2337/dc24-0626
Ming Yeh Lee, Susan M Seav, Loice Ongwela, Julie J Lee, Rachel Aubyrn, Fang Y Cao, Anna Kalinsky, Olivia Aparicio Ramos, Yunzi Gu, Kailee Kingston, Maja Ivanovic, Bruce A Buckingham, Dimpi Desai, Rayhan A Lal, Marilyn Tan, Marina Basina, Michael S Hughes
{"title":"增强住院糖尿病患者的能力:在全院范围内实施胰岛素剂量电子病历集成验证 CGM 政策。","authors":"Ming Yeh Lee, Susan M Seav, Loice Ongwela, Julie J Lee, Rachel Aubyrn, Fang Y Cao, Anna Kalinsky, Olivia Aparicio Ramos, Yunzi Gu, Kailee Kingston, Maja Ivanovic, Bruce A Buckingham, Dimpi Desai, Rayhan A Lal, Marilyn Tan, Marina Basina, Michael S Hughes","doi":"10.2337/dc24-0626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the feasibility, clinical accuracy, and acceptance of a hospital-wide continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) policy with electronic health record (EHR)-integrated validation for insulin dosing.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A hospital policy was developed and implemented at Stanford Health Care for using personal CGMs in lieu of fingerstick blood glucose (FSBG) monitoring. It included requirements specific to each CGM, accuracy monitoring protocols, and EHR integration. User experience surveys were conducted among a subset of patients and nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2022 to August 2023, 135 patients used the CGM protocol in 185 inpatient encounters. This group included 27% with type 1 diabetes and 24% with automated insulin delivery systems. The most-used CGMs were Dexcom G6 (44%) and FreeStyle Libre 2 (43%). Of 1,506 CGM validation attempts, 87.8% met the 20% or 20 mg/dL (%20/20) criterion for CGM-based insulin dosing and 99.3% fell within Clarke zones A or B. User experience surveys were completed by 27 nurses and 46 patients. Most nurses found glucose management under the protocol effective (74%), easy to use (67%), and efficient (63%); 80% of nurses preferred inpatient CGM to FSBG. Most patients liked the CGM protocol (63%), reported positive CGM interactions with nursing staff (63%), and felt no significant interruptions to their diabetes management (63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a hospital-wide inpatient CGM policy supporting multiple CGM types with real-time accuracy monitoring and integration into the EHR is feasible. Initial feedback from nurses and patients was favorable, and further investigation toward broader use and sustainability is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1838-1845"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering Hospitalized Patients With Diabetes: Implementation of a Hospital-wide CGM Policy With EHR-Integrated Validation for Dosing Insulin.\",\"authors\":\"Ming Yeh Lee, Susan M Seav, Loice Ongwela, Julie J Lee, Rachel Aubyrn, Fang Y Cao, Anna Kalinsky, Olivia Aparicio Ramos, Yunzi Gu, Kailee Kingston, Maja Ivanovic, Bruce A Buckingham, Dimpi Desai, Rayhan A Lal, Marilyn Tan, Marina Basina, Michael S Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc24-0626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the feasibility, clinical accuracy, and acceptance of a hospital-wide continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) policy with electronic health record (EHR)-integrated validation for insulin dosing.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A hospital policy was developed and implemented at Stanford Health Care for using personal CGMs in lieu of fingerstick blood glucose (FSBG) monitoring. It included requirements specific to each CGM, accuracy monitoring protocols, and EHR integration. User experience surveys were conducted among a subset of patients and nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2022 to August 2023, 135 patients used the CGM protocol in 185 inpatient encounters. This group included 27% with type 1 diabetes and 24% with automated insulin delivery systems. The most-used CGMs were Dexcom G6 (44%) and FreeStyle Libre 2 (43%). Of 1,506 CGM validation attempts, 87.8% met the 20% or 20 mg/dL (%20/20) criterion for CGM-based insulin dosing and 99.3% fell within Clarke zones A or B. User experience surveys were completed by 27 nurses and 46 patients. Most nurses found glucose management under the protocol effective (74%), easy to use (67%), and efficient (63%); 80% of nurses preferred inpatient CGM to FSBG. Most patients liked the CGM protocol (63%), reported positive CGM interactions with nursing staff (63%), and felt no significant interruptions to their diabetes management (63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a hospital-wide inpatient CGM policy supporting multiple CGM types with real-time accuracy monitoring and integration into the EHR is feasible. Initial feedback from nurses and patients was favorable, and further investigation toward broader use and sustainability is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1838-1845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417271/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的我们旨在评估全院范围内的连续血糖监测(CGM)政策的可行性、临床准确性和接受度,并结合电子健康记录(EHR)对胰岛素剂量进行验证:斯坦福医疗集团制定并实施了一项医院政策,使用个人血糖监测仪(CGM)代替指血血糖监测仪(FSBG)。其中包括对每种 CGM 的具体要求、准确性监测协议和电子病历集成。对部分患者和护士进行了用户体验调查:从 2022 年 11 月到 2023 年 8 月,135 名患者在 185 次住院治疗中使用了 CGM 方案。其中 27% 患有 1 型糖尿病,24% 患有胰岛素自动给药系统。使用最多的 CGM 是 Dexcom G6(44%)和 FreeStyle Libre 2(43%)。在 1,506 次 CGM 验证尝试中,87.8% 符合基于 CGM 的胰岛素剂量 %20/20 标准,99.3% 属于 A 区或 B 区。大多数护士认为该方案下的血糖管理有效(74%)、易用(67%)、高效(63%);80%的护士更喜欢住院患者 CGM 而不是 FSBG。大多数患者喜欢 CGM 方案(63%),表示 CGM 与护理人员之间有积极的互动(63%),并认为他们的糖尿病管理没有受到明显干扰(63%):结论:在全院范围内实施一项住院病人 CGM 政策是可行的,该政策支持多种 CGM 类型,具有实时准确性监测功能,并与电子病历集成。护士和患者的初步反馈良好,但仍需进一步调查,以扩大使用范围并实现可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empowering Hospitalized Patients With Diabetes: Implementation of a Hospital-wide CGM Policy With EHR-Integrated Validation for Dosing Insulin.

Objective: We aimed to assess the feasibility, clinical accuracy, and acceptance of a hospital-wide continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) policy with electronic health record (EHR)-integrated validation for insulin dosing.

Research design and methods: A hospital policy was developed and implemented at Stanford Health Care for using personal CGMs in lieu of fingerstick blood glucose (FSBG) monitoring. It included requirements specific to each CGM, accuracy monitoring protocols, and EHR integration. User experience surveys were conducted among a subset of patients and nurses.

Results: From November 2022 to August 2023, 135 patients used the CGM protocol in 185 inpatient encounters. This group included 27% with type 1 diabetes and 24% with automated insulin delivery systems. The most-used CGMs were Dexcom G6 (44%) and FreeStyle Libre 2 (43%). Of 1,506 CGM validation attempts, 87.8% met the 20% or 20 mg/dL (%20/20) criterion for CGM-based insulin dosing and 99.3% fell within Clarke zones A or B. User experience surveys were completed by 27 nurses and 46 patients. Most nurses found glucose management under the protocol effective (74%), easy to use (67%), and efficient (63%); 80% of nurses preferred inpatient CGM to FSBG. Most patients liked the CGM protocol (63%), reported positive CGM interactions with nursing staff (63%), and felt no significant interruptions to their diabetes management (63%).

Conclusions: Implementation of a hospital-wide inpatient CGM policy supporting multiple CGM types with real-time accuracy monitoring and integration into the EHR is feasible. Initial feedback from nurses and patients was favorable, and further investigation toward broader use and sustainability is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信