浸脚和颈部降温对暴露于室内过热环境中的老年人心脏自主神经功能的影响:随机交叉试验。

Emma Rebecca McCourt, Robert D Meade, Brodie J Richards, Nicholas J Koetje, Nicholas B Santucci, James J McCormick, Pierre Boulay, Ronald J Sigal, Glen P Kenny
{"title":"浸脚和颈部降温对暴露于室内过热环境中的老年人心脏自主神经功能的影响:随机交叉试验。","authors":"Emma Rebecca McCourt, Robert D Meade, Brodie J Richards, Nicholas J Koetje, Nicholas B Santucci, James J McCormick, Pierre Boulay, Ronald J Sigal, Glen P Kenny","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Foot immersion and neck cooling are recommended cooling strategies for protecting heat-vulnerable persons during heat waves. While we recently showed that these strategies do not limit core temperature increases in older adults during prolonged heat exposure, we did observe small reductions in heart rate. Expanding on these findings, we examined the effects of foot immersion with and without neck cooling on cardiac autonomic function. Seventeen adults (9 females; 65-81 years) underwent 3 randomized, 6-hour exposures to 38°C and 35% relative humidity with: no cooling (control), foot immersion (20°C water), or foot immersion with a wet towel (20°C) around the neck. Cardiac autonomic responses were measured at baseline and end-exposure. These included heart rate variability, cardiac and systolic blood pressure responses to standing, indexed via the 30:15 ratio and supine-to-standing systolic pressure change, respectively, and baroreflex sensitivity during repeated sit-to-stand maneuvers. The 30:15 ratio was 0.04 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.07] greater with foot immersion and neck cooling (1.08 (0.04)) relative to control (1.04 (0.06); P=0.018). Similarly, standing systolic pressure was elevated 9 [0, 17] mm Hg with foot immersion and neck cooling (P=0.043). That said, neither difference remained statistically significant after adjusting for multiplicity (Padjusted≥0.054). No differences in 30:15 ratio or standing systolic pressure were observed with foot immersion alone, while heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity were unaffected by either cooling intervention. While foot immersion with neck cooling potentially improved cardiac autonomic responses in older adults exposed to simulated indoor overheating, these effects were small and of questionable clinical importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of foot immersion and neck cooling on cardiac autonomic function in older adults exposed to indoor overheating : a randomized crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Rebecca McCourt, Robert D Meade, Brodie J Richards, Nicholas J Koetje, Nicholas B Santucci, James J McCormick, Pierre Boulay, Ronald J Sigal, Glen P Kenny\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/apnm-2024-0126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Foot immersion and neck cooling are recommended cooling strategies for protecting heat-vulnerable persons during heat waves. While we recently showed that these strategies do not limit core temperature increases in older adults during prolonged heat exposure, we did observe small reductions in heart rate. Expanding on these findings, we examined the effects of foot immersion with and without neck cooling on cardiac autonomic function. Seventeen adults (9 females; 65-81 years) underwent 3 randomized, 6-hour exposures to 38°C and 35% relative humidity with: no cooling (control), foot immersion (20°C water), or foot immersion with a wet towel (20°C) around the neck. Cardiac autonomic responses were measured at baseline and end-exposure. These included heart rate variability, cardiac and systolic blood pressure responses to standing, indexed via the 30:15 ratio and supine-to-standing systolic pressure change, respectively, and baroreflex sensitivity during repeated sit-to-stand maneuvers. The 30:15 ratio was 0.04 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.07] greater with foot immersion and neck cooling (1.08 (0.04)) relative to control (1.04 (0.06); P=0.018). Similarly, standing systolic pressure was elevated 9 [0, 17] mm Hg with foot immersion and neck cooling (P=0.043). That said, neither difference remained statistically significant after adjusting for multiplicity (Padjusted≥0.054). No differences in 30:15 ratio or standing systolic pressure were observed with foot immersion alone, while heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity were unaffected by either cooling intervention. While foot immersion with neck cooling potentially improved cardiac autonomic responses in older adults exposed to simulated indoor overheating, these effects were small and of questionable clinical importance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

浸脚和颈部降温是在热浪期间保护易受高温影响人群的推荐降温策略。虽然我们最近的研究表明,这些策略并不能限制老年人在长时间暴露在高温下核心温度的升高,但我们确实观察到心率略有下降。在这些研究结果的基础上,我们研究了有颈部降温和无颈部降温的浸脚对心脏自主神经功能的影响。17 名成年人(9 名女性;65-81 岁)在 38°C 和 35% 相对湿度下随机暴露了 3 次,每次 6 小时,暴露方式包括:不降温(对照组)、浸脚(20°C 的水)或用湿毛巾(20°C)围颈浸脚。在基线和暴露结束时测量心脏自律神经反应。其中包括心率变异性、心脏和收缩压对站立的反应(分别以 30:15 比值和仰卧位至站立位收缩压变化为指标),以及重复坐立动作时的气压反射敏感性。相对于对照组(1.04 (0.06);P=0.018),浸脚和颈部降温时的 30:15 比值(1.08 (0.04))高出 0.04 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.07]。同样,足部浸泡和颈部降温可使站立收缩压升高 9 [0, 17] mm Hg(P=0.043)。尽管如此,在对多重性进行调整后,两者的差异仍无统计学意义(Padjusted≥0.054)。仅浸泡足部对 30:15 比率或站立收缩压没有影响,而心率变异性和气压反射敏感性则不受任何一种降温干预措施的影响。虽然足部浸泡和颈部降温可能会改善暴露在模拟室内过热环境中的老年人的心脏自主神经反应,但这些影响很小,临床重要性值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of foot immersion and neck cooling on cardiac autonomic function in older adults exposed to indoor overheating : a randomized crossover trial.

Foot immersion and neck cooling are recommended cooling strategies for protecting heat-vulnerable persons during heat waves. While we recently showed that these strategies do not limit core temperature increases in older adults during prolonged heat exposure, we did observe small reductions in heart rate. Expanding on these findings, we examined the effects of foot immersion with and without neck cooling on cardiac autonomic function. Seventeen adults (9 females; 65-81 years) underwent 3 randomized, 6-hour exposures to 38°C and 35% relative humidity with: no cooling (control), foot immersion (20°C water), or foot immersion with a wet towel (20°C) around the neck. Cardiac autonomic responses were measured at baseline and end-exposure. These included heart rate variability, cardiac and systolic blood pressure responses to standing, indexed via the 30:15 ratio and supine-to-standing systolic pressure change, respectively, and baroreflex sensitivity during repeated sit-to-stand maneuvers. The 30:15 ratio was 0.04 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.07] greater with foot immersion and neck cooling (1.08 (0.04)) relative to control (1.04 (0.06); P=0.018). Similarly, standing systolic pressure was elevated 9 [0, 17] mm Hg with foot immersion and neck cooling (P=0.043). That said, neither difference remained statistically significant after adjusting for multiplicity (Padjusted≥0.054). No differences in 30:15 ratio or standing systolic pressure were observed with foot immersion alone, while heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity were unaffected by either cooling intervention. While foot immersion with neck cooling potentially improved cardiac autonomic responses in older adults exposed to simulated indoor overheating, these effects were small and of questionable clinical importance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信