{"title":"肱二头肌长头肌腱病变患者干针治疗后疼痛、功能和腱周渗出的改善:单盲随机临床试验。","authors":"I-Wei Chen, Ying-Tzu Liao, Hsin Tseng, Hsiao-Che Lin, Li-Wei Chou","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2391528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long head of biceps brachii tendinopathy, a frequent source of anterior shoulder pain, may lead to discomfort and diminished function. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of dry needling and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in these patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Thirty patients were randomized into dry needling and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation groups and assessed before treatment, 8 and 15 days after treatment using a visual analogue scale, shoulder pain and disability index, pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, and biceps peritendinous effusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatments significantly reduced the visual analogue scale in immediate (<i>p</i> < 0.001), short-term (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and medium-term effects (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Dry needling outperformed transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the pain (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and disability (<i>p</i> < 0.03) subscales of the shoulder pain and disability index in the short-term and medium-term effects, respectively. Pressure pain threshold increased after both treatments but didn't last beyond 8 days. Neither treatment showed any improvements in tissue hardness of the long head of biceps brachii muscle. Notably, only the dry needling group significantly reduced biceps peritendinous effusion in both short-term and medium-term effects (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dry needling showed non-inferior results to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing pain and disability and demonstrated even superior results in reducing biceps peritendinous effusion (see Graphical Abstract).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The Institutional Review Board of the China Medical University Hospital (CMUH107-REC2-101) approved this study, and it was registered with Identifier NCT03639454 on ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":"2391528"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain, function and peritendinous effusion improvement after dry needling in patients with long head of biceps brachii tendinopathy: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"I-Wei Chen, Ying-Tzu Liao, Hsin Tseng, Hsiao-Che Lin, Li-Wei Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2024.2391528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long head of biceps brachii tendinopathy, a frequent source of anterior shoulder pain, may lead to discomfort and diminished function. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of dry needling and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in these patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Thirty patients were randomized into dry needling and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation groups and assessed before treatment, 8 and 15 days after treatment using a visual analogue scale, shoulder pain and disability index, pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, and biceps peritendinous effusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatments significantly reduced the visual analogue scale in immediate (<i>p</i> < 0.001), short-term (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and medium-term effects (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Dry needling outperformed transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the pain (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and disability (<i>p</i> < 0.03) subscales of the shoulder pain and disability index in the short-term and medium-term effects, respectively. Pressure pain threshold increased after both treatments but didn't last beyond 8 days. Neither treatment showed any improvements in tissue hardness of the long head of biceps brachii muscle. Notably, only the dry needling group significantly reduced biceps peritendinous effusion in both short-term and medium-term effects (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dry needling showed non-inferior results to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing pain and disability and demonstrated even superior results in reducing biceps peritendinous effusion (see Graphical Abstract).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The Institutional Review Board of the China Medical University Hospital (CMUH107-REC2-101) approved this study, and it was registered with Identifier NCT03639454 on ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"2391528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2391528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2391528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:肱二头肌长头肌腱病是肩关节前部疼痛的常见病因,可导致不适和功能减退。本研究旨在评估干针疗法和经皮神经电刺激疗法对这些患者的疗效:将 30 名患者随机分为干针治疗组和经皮电神经刺激组,在治疗前、治疗后 8 天和 15 天使用视觉模拟量表、肩痛和残疾指数、压痛阈值、组织硬度和肱二头肌腱周渗出进行评估:两种疗法都能明显降低视觉模拟量表的即时评分(p p p p p p p 结论):在减少疼痛和残疾方面,干针疗法的效果并不亚于经皮神经电刺激疗法,而在减少肱二头肌腱周渗出方面,干针疗法的效果甚至优于经皮神经电刺激疗法(见图表摘要):本研究已获得中国医科大学附属中山医院机构审查委员会(CMUH107-REC2-101)批准,并在ClinicalTrials.gov上以NCT03639454注册。
Pain, function and peritendinous effusion improvement after dry needling in patients with long head of biceps brachii tendinopathy: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.
Introduction: Long head of biceps brachii tendinopathy, a frequent source of anterior shoulder pain, may lead to discomfort and diminished function. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of dry needling and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in these patients.
Patients and methods: Thirty patients were randomized into dry needling and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation groups and assessed before treatment, 8 and 15 days after treatment using a visual analogue scale, shoulder pain and disability index, pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, and biceps peritendinous effusion.
Results: Both treatments significantly reduced the visual analogue scale in immediate (p < 0.001), short-term (p < 0.01), and medium-term effects (p < 0.01). Dry needling outperformed transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the pain (p < 0.01) and disability (p < 0.03) subscales of the shoulder pain and disability index in the short-term and medium-term effects, respectively. Pressure pain threshold increased after both treatments but didn't last beyond 8 days. Neither treatment showed any improvements in tissue hardness of the long head of biceps brachii muscle. Notably, only the dry needling group significantly reduced biceps peritendinous effusion in both short-term and medium-term effects (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Dry needling showed non-inferior results to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing pain and disability and demonstrated even superior results in reducing biceps peritendinous effusion (see Graphical Abstract).
Trial registration: The Institutional Review Board of the China Medical University Hospital (CMUH107-REC2-101) approved this study, and it was registered with Identifier NCT03639454 on ClinicalTrials.gov.