在肾移植过程中参与临床研究的幼儿的混合方法研究。

Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1177/15269248241268718
Marieke Voet, Guusje Lucker, Ignacio Malagon, Nienke Maas-van Schaaijk, Elisabeth A M Cornelissen, Yvonne Engels
{"title":"在肾移植过程中参与临床研究的幼儿的混合方法研究。","authors":"Marieke Voet, Guusje Lucker, Ignacio Malagon, Nienke Maas-van Schaaijk, Elisabeth A M Cornelissen, Yvonne Engels","doi":"10.1177/15269248241268718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regulations designed to protect children participating in clinical research often restrict the availability of research data necessary for the development of age-specific therapies and drug dosing. Few data exist on how children experience participation in clinical research, and studies investigating young children undergoing an intensive medical treatment are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods with semi-structured interviews and DISCO-RC questionnaires were used to explore young children's and their parents' experiences in clinical research participation during a kidney transplantation trajectory.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nine children and their parents were interviewed. Children's median age at kidney transplantation was 4 years (IQR 4,7); age at interview was 7 years (IQR 6,9). Thematic content analysis of interviews revealed that most children were unaware of having participated in a study. Both children and their parents frequently were unaware whether procedures were standard care or research related. The additional burden attributed to study participation varied from not at all to heavy in combination with intensive medical treatment. Positive experiences included kind healthcare professionals, effective distraction techniques, educational aspects, contributing to science and extra check-ups. Most reported negative experiences were conflicting communication, spending much time in the hospital, missing school and suboptimal planning. Venous puncture was stressful for all children, whereas the discomfort of other procedures varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric clinical research design should focus on education and fun during research procedures, smart planning, consistent communication, close collaboration between clinical and research team and age appropriate distraction techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mixed Method Study in Young Children Participating in Clinical Research During A Kidney Transplantation Trajectory.\",\"authors\":\"Marieke Voet, Guusje Lucker, Ignacio Malagon, Nienke Maas-van Schaaijk, Elisabeth A M Cornelissen, Yvonne Engels\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15269248241268718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regulations designed to protect children participating in clinical research often restrict the availability of research data necessary for the development of age-specific therapies and drug dosing. Few data exist on how children experience participation in clinical research, and studies investigating young children undergoing an intensive medical treatment are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods with semi-structured interviews and DISCO-RC questionnaires were used to explore young children's and their parents' experiences in clinical research participation during a kidney transplantation trajectory.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nine children and their parents were interviewed. Children's median age at kidney transplantation was 4 years (IQR 4,7); age at interview was 7 years (IQR 6,9). Thematic content analysis of interviews revealed that most children were unaware of having participated in a study. Both children and their parents frequently were unaware whether procedures were standard care or research related. The additional burden attributed to study participation varied from not at all to heavy in combination with intensive medical treatment. Positive experiences included kind healthcare professionals, effective distraction techniques, educational aspects, contributing to science and extra check-ups. Most reported negative experiences were conflicting communication, spending much time in the hospital, missing school and suboptimal planning. Venous puncture was stressful for all children, whereas the discomfort of other procedures varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric clinical research design should focus on education and fun during research procedures, smart planning, consistent communication, close collaboration between clinical and research team and age appropriate distraction techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248241268718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248241268718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:旨在保护参与临床研究的儿童的法规往往限制了开发特定年龄疗法和药物剂量所需的研究数据的可用性。关于儿童如何体验参与临床研究的数据寥寥无几,也缺乏对正在接受强化治疗的幼儿进行调查的研究:方法:采用半结构式访谈和 DISCO-RC 问卷调查等混合方法,探讨幼儿及其父母在肾移植过程中参与临床研究的经历:对九名儿童及其父母进行了访谈。儿童接受肾移植时的年龄中位数为 4 岁(IQR 4,7);接受访谈时的年龄为 7 岁(IQR 6,9)。对访谈内容进行的主题分析表明,大多数儿童都不知道自己曾参与过一项研究。儿童和他们的父母经常不知道这些程序是标准护理程序还是与研究相关的程序。参与研究带来的额外负担从完全没有到与强化医疗相结合的沉重负担不等。积极的经历包括和蔼可亲的医护人员、有效的转移注意力技巧、教育方面、对科学的贡献以及额外的检查。报告最多的负面经历是沟通冲突、在医院花费大量时间、旷课和计划不周。所有儿童都对静脉穿刺感到紧张,而对其他程序的不适感则各不相同:结论:儿科临床研究设计应注重研究过程中的寓教于乐、巧妙规划、持续沟通、临床和研究团队之间的密切合作以及适合儿童年龄的分散注意力技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
A Mixed Method Study in Young Children Participating in Clinical Research During A Kidney Transplantation Trajectory.

Introduction: Regulations designed to protect children participating in clinical research often restrict the availability of research data necessary for the development of age-specific therapies and drug dosing. Few data exist on how children experience participation in clinical research, and studies investigating young children undergoing an intensive medical treatment are lacking.

Methods: Mixed methods with semi-structured interviews and DISCO-RC questionnaires were used to explore young children's and their parents' experiences in clinical research participation during a kidney transplantation trajectory.

Findings: Nine children and their parents were interviewed. Children's median age at kidney transplantation was 4 years (IQR 4,7); age at interview was 7 years (IQR 6,9). Thematic content analysis of interviews revealed that most children were unaware of having participated in a study. Both children and their parents frequently were unaware whether procedures were standard care or research related. The additional burden attributed to study participation varied from not at all to heavy in combination with intensive medical treatment. Positive experiences included kind healthcare professionals, effective distraction techniques, educational aspects, contributing to science and extra check-ups. Most reported negative experiences were conflicting communication, spending much time in the hospital, missing school and suboptimal planning. Venous puncture was stressful for all children, whereas the discomfort of other procedures varied.

Conclusion: Pediatric clinical research design should focus on education and fun during research procedures, smart planning, consistent communication, close collaboration between clinical and research team and age appropriate distraction techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信