S Ponglowhapan, K Pattanaviboon, Y Maneerattanavichien, P Phitchayangkoon, P Lueangprasert, A Preechatangkit, S Suthigarn, P Saisawart, C Thanaboonnipat, N Choisunirachon
{"title":"用超声波测量健康完整公犬和良性前列腺增生犬的前列腺尺寸与主动脉管腔直径。","authors":"S Ponglowhapan, K Pattanaviboon, Y Maneerattanavichien, P Phitchayangkoon, P Lueangprasert, A Preechatangkit, S Suthigarn, P Saisawart, C Thanaboonnipat, N Choisunirachon","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish ultrasonographic measurements of the prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios including the prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio in healthy, intact male dogs and compare these ratios between healthy dogs and dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Healthy dogs (n = 75) and dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 104) were included in the study. Prostate length, width, average height and aortic luminal diameter were measured from ultrasonographic images. In addition, prostatic volume was calculated, and prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In healthy dogs, aortic luminal diameter was significantly associated with bodyweight and the prostatic width while body condition scores, prostate length and prostatic average height were not associated. Prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios and prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio was not significantly different among dogs with different body condition scores either in healthy dogs or dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia, except prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios were significantly higher in benign prostatic hyperplasia while prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio significantly higher in healthy dogs. Prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios demonstrated medium to high sensitivity and specificity when distinguishing between healthy dogs and dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostatomegaly, should be considered when the prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios increase. The calculated cut-off values were 3.68, 4.46 and 3.06 for prostate length-to-aortic luminal diameter, prostatic width- to-aortic luminal diameter and prostatic average height-to-aortic luminal diameter, respectively.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios could be useful to evaluate the size of the prostate in dogs, as it is unaffected by the body condition scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasonographic measurement of the prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter in healthy intact male dogs and dogs with benign prostatic hyperplasia.\",\"authors\":\"S Ponglowhapan, K Pattanaviboon, Y Maneerattanavichien, P Phitchayangkoon, P Lueangprasert, A Preechatangkit, S Suthigarn, P Saisawart, C Thanaboonnipat, N Choisunirachon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsap.13766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish ultrasonographic measurements of the prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios including the prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio in healthy, intact male dogs and compare these ratios between healthy dogs and dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Healthy dogs (n = 75) and dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 104) were included in the study. Prostate length, width, average height and aortic luminal diameter were measured from ultrasonographic images. In addition, prostatic volume was calculated, and prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In healthy dogs, aortic luminal diameter was significantly associated with bodyweight and the prostatic width while body condition scores, prostate length and prostatic average height were not associated. Prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios and prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio was not significantly different among dogs with different body condition scores either in healthy dogs or dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia, except prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios were significantly higher in benign prostatic hyperplasia while prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio significantly higher in healthy dogs. Prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios demonstrated medium to high sensitivity and specificity when distinguishing between healthy dogs and dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostatomegaly, should be considered when the prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios increase. The calculated cut-off values were 3.68, 4.46 and 3.06 for prostate length-to-aortic luminal diameter, prostatic width- to-aortic luminal diameter and prostatic average height-to-aortic luminal diameter, respectively.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios could be useful to evaluate the size of the prostate in dogs, as it is unaffected by the body condition scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13766\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13766","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasonographic measurement of the prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter in healthy intact male dogs and dogs with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Objectives: To establish ultrasonographic measurements of the prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios including the prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio in healthy, intact male dogs and compare these ratios between healthy dogs and dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Materials and methods: Healthy dogs (n = 75) and dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 104) were included in the study. Prostate length, width, average height and aortic luminal diameter were measured from ultrasonographic images. In addition, prostatic volume was calculated, and prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter were also compared.
Results: In healthy dogs, aortic luminal diameter was significantly associated with bodyweight and the prostatic width while body condition scores, prostate length and prostatic average height were not associated. Prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios and prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio was not significantly different among dogs with different body condition scores either in healthy dogs or dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia, except prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios were significantly higher in benign prostatic hyperplasia while prostatic volume-to-aortic luminal diameter ratio significantly higher in healthy dogs. Prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios demonstrated medium to high sensitivity and specificity when distinguishing between healthy dogs and dogs affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostatomegaly, should be considered when the prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios increase. The calculated cut-off values were 3.68, 4.46 and 3.06 for prostate length-to-aortic luminal diameter, prostatic width- to-aortic luminal diameter and prostatic average height-to-aortic luminal diameter, respectively.
Clinical significance: The prostatic dimension-to-aortic luminal diameter ratios could be useful to evaluate the size of the prostate in dogs, as it is unaffected by the body condition scores.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery.
In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world.
The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher.
The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association