比较商用高灵敏度流式细胞仪和定制单分子流式细胞仪对 EV 的表征。

IF 15.5 1区 医学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY
James Kim, Shihan Xu, Seung-Ryoung Jung, Alya Nguyen, Yuanhua Cheng, Mengxia Zhao, Bryant S. Fujimoto, Wyatt Nelson, Perry Schiro, Jeffrey L. Franklin, James N. Higginbotham, Robert J. Coffey, Min Shi, Lucia N. Vojtech, Florian Hladik, Muneesh Tewari, John Tigges, Ionita Ghiran, Tijana Jovanovic-Talisman, Louise C. Laurent, Saumya Das, Olesia Gololobova, Kenneth W. Witwer, Tuoye Xu, Al Charest, Kendall Van Keuren Jensen, Robert L. Raffai, Jennifer C. Jones, Joshua A. Welsh, John P. Nolan, Daniel T. Chiu
{"title":"比较商用高灵敏度流式细胞仪和定制单分子流式细胞仪对 EV 的表征。","authors":"James Kim,&nbsp;Shihan Xu,&nbsp;Seung-Ryoung Jung,&nbsp;Alya Nguyen,&nbsp;Yuanhua Cheng,&nbsp;Mengxia Zhao,&nbsp;Bryant S. Fujimoto,&nbsp;Wyatt Nelson,&nbsp;Perry Schiro,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Franklin,&nbsp;James N. Higginbotham,&nbsp;Robert J. Coffey,&nbsp;Min Shi,&nbsp;Lucia N. Vojtech,&nbsp;Florian Hladik,&nbsp;Muneesh Tewari,&nbsp;John Tigges,&nbsp;Ionita Ghiran,&nbsp;Tijana Jovanovic-Talisman,&nbsp;Louise C. Laurent,&nbsp;Saumya Das,&nbsp;Olesia Gololobova,&nbsp;Kenneth W. Witwer,&nbsp;Tuoye Xu,&nbsp;Al Charest,&nbsp;Kendall Van Keuren Jensen,&nbsp;Robert L. Raffai,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Jones,&nbsp;Joshua A. Welsh,&nbsp;John P. Nolan,&nbsp;Daniel T. Chiu","doi":"10.1002/jev2.12498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>High-sensitivity flow cytometers have been developed for multi-parameter characterization of single extracellular vesicles (EVs), but performance varies among instruments and calibration methods. Here we compare the characterization of identical (split) EV samples derived from human colorectal cancer (DiFi) cells by three high-sensitivity flow cytometers, two commercial instruments, CytoFLEX/CellStream, and a custom single-molecule flow cytometer (SMFC). DiFi EVs were stained with the membrane dye di-8-ANEPPS and with PE-conjugated anti-EGFR or anti-tetraspanin (CD9/CD63/CD81) antibodies for estimation of EV size and surface protein copy numbers. The limits of detection (LODs) for immunofluorescence and vesicle size based on calibration using cross-calibrated, hard-dyed beads were ∼10 PE/∼80 nm EV diameter for CytoFLEX and ∼10 PEs/∼67 nm for CellStream. For the SMFC, the LOD for immunofluorescence was 1 PE and ≤ 35 nm for size. The population of EVs detected by each system (di-8-ANEPPS<sup>+</sup>/PE<sup>+</sup> particles) differed widely depending on the LOD of the system; for example, CellStream/CytoFLEX detected only 5.7% and 1.5% of the tetraspanin-labelled EVs detected by SMFC, respectively, and median EV diameter and antibody copy numbers were much larger for CellStream/CytoFLEX than for SMFC as measured and validated using super-resolution/single-molecule TIRF microscopy. To obtain a dataset representing a common EV population analysed by all three platforms, we filtered out SMFC and CellStream measurements for EVs below the CytoFLEX LODs as determined by bead calibration (10 PE/80 nm). The inter-platform agreement using this filtered dataset was significantly better than for the unfiltered dataset, but even better concordance between results was obtained by applying higher cutoffs (21 PE/120 nm) determined by threshold analysis using the SMFC data. The results demonstrate the impact of specifying LODs to define the EV population analysed on inter-instrument reproducibility in EV flow cytometry studies, and the utility of threshold analysis of SMFC data for providing semi-quantitative LOD values for other flow cytometers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jev2.12498","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of EV characterization by commercial high-sensitivity flow cytometers and a custom single-molecule flow cytometer\",\"authors\":\"James Kim,&nbsp;Shihan Xu,&nbsp;Seung-Ryoung Jung,&nbsp;Alya Nguyen,&nbsp;Yuanhua Cheng,&nbsp;Mengxia Zhao,&nbsp;Bryant S. Fujimoto,&nbsp;Wyatt Nelson,&nbsp;Perry Schiro,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Franklin,&nbsp;James N. Higginbotham,&nbsp;Robert J. Coffey,&nbsp;Min Shi,&nbsp;Lucia N. Vojtech,&nbsp;Florian Hladik,&nbsp;Muneesh Tewari,&nbsp;John Tigges,&nbsp;Ionita Ghiran,&nbsp;Tijana Jovanovic-Talisman,&nbsp;Louise C. Laurent,&nbsp;Saumya Das,&nbsp;Olesia Gololobova,&nbsp;Kenneth W. Witwer,&nbsp;Tuoye Xu,&nbsp;Al Charest,&nbsp;Kendall Van Keuren Jensen,&nbsp;Robert L. Raffai,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Jones,&nbsp;Joshua A. Welsh,&nbsp;John P. Nolan,&nbsp;Daniel T. Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jev2.12498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>High-sensitivity flow cytometers have been developed for multi-parameter characterization of single extracellular vesicles (EVs), but performance varies among instruments and calibration methods. Here we compare the characterization of identical (split) EV samples derived from human colorectal cancer (DiFi) cells by three high-sensitivity flow cytometers, two commercial instruments, CytoFLEX/CellStream, and a custom single-molecule flow cytometer (SMFC). DiFi EVs were stained with the membrane dye di-8-ANEPPS and with PE-conjugated anti-EGFR or anti-tetraspanin (CD9/CD63/CD81) antibodies for estimation of EV size and surface protein copy numbers. The limits of detection (LODs) for immunofluorescence and vesicle size based on calibration using cross-calibrated, hard-dyed beads were ∼10 PE/∼80 nm EV diameter for CytoFLEX and ∼10 PEs/∼67 nm for CellStream. For the SMFC, the LOD for immunofluorescence was 1 PE and ≤ 35 nm for size. The population of EVs detected by each system (di-8-ANEPPS<sup>+</sup>/PE<sup>+</sup> particles) differed widely depending on the LOD of the system; for example, CellStream/CytoFLEX detected only 5.7% and 1.5% of the tetraspanin-labelled EVs detected by SMFC, respectively, and median EV diameter and antibody copy numbers were much larger for CellStream/CytoFLEX than for SMFC as measured and validated using super-resolution/single-molecule TIRF microscopy. To obtain a dataset representing a common EV population analysed by all three platforms, we filtered out SMFC and CellStream measurements for EVs below the CytoFLEX LODs as determined by bead calibration (10 PE/80 nm). The inter-platform agreement using this filtered dataset was significantly better than for the unfiltered dataset, but even better concordance between results was obtained by applying higher cutoffs (21 PE/120 nm) determined by threshold analysis using the SMFC data. The results demonstrate the impact of specifying LODs to define the EV population analysed on inter-instrument reproducibility in EV flow cytometry studies, and the utility of threshold analysis of SMFC data for providing semi-quantitative LOD values for other flow cytometers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jev2.12498\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jev2.12498\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jev2.12498","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高灵敏度流式细胞仪是为单个细胞外囊泡 (EV) 的多参数表征而开发的,但不同仪器和校准方法的性能各不相同。在这里,我们比较了三种高灵敏度流式细胞仪(两种商用仪器 CytoFLEX/CellStream 和一种定制的单分子流式细胞仪 (SMFC))对来自人类结直肠癌(DiFi)细胞的相同(分裂)EV 样品的表征。DiFi EV用膜染料di-8-ANEPPS和PE结合的抗EGFR或抗tetraspanin(CD9/CD63/CD81)抗体染色,以估计EV大小和表面蛋白拷贝数。免疫荧光和囊泡大小的检测限(LODs)是使用交叉校准的硬染色珠校准的,CytoFLEX 的检测限为 ∼10 PE/∼80 nm EV 直径,CellStream 的检测限为 ∼10 PEs/∼67 nm。对于 SMFC,免疫荧光的 LOD 为 1 PE,尺寸≤ 35 nm。每种系统(di-8-ANEPPS+/PE+颗粒)检测到的EV数量因系统的LOD不同而有很大差异;例如,CellStream/CytoFLEX检测到的四聚乙二醇标记EV分别只有SMFC的5.7%和1.5%,而且CellStream/CytoFLEX的中位EV直径和抗体拷贝数远大于SMFC,这是用超分辨/单分子TIRF显微镜测量和验证的。为了获得代表所有三种平台分析的共同 EV 群体的数据集,我们过滤掉了 SMFC 和 CellStream 测量的低于 CytoFLEX LODs 的 EV,这些 LODs 是通过珠子校准(10 PE/80 nm)确定的。使用该过滤数据集的平台间一致性明显优于未过滤的数据集,但通过使用 SMFC 数据的阈值分析确定更高的临界值(21 PE/120 nm),结果间的一致性甚至更好。这些结果表明了指定 LOD 来定义所分析的 EV 群体对 EV 流式细胞仪研究中仪器间重现性的影响,以及 SMFC 数据的阈值分析为其他流式细胞仪提供半定量 LOD 值的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of EV characterization by commercial high-sensitivity flow cytometers and a custom single-molecule flow cytometer

Comparison of EV characterization by commercial high-sensitivity flow cytometers and a custom single-molecule flow cytometer

High-sensitivity flow cytometers have been developed for multi-parameter characterization of single extracellular vesicles (EVs), but performance varies among instruments and calibration methods. Here we compare the characterization of identical (split) EV samples derived from human colorectal cancer (DiFi) cells by three high-sensitivity flow cytometers, two commercial instruments, CytoFLEX/CellStream, and a custom single-molecule flow cytometer (SMFC). DiFi EVs were stained with the membrane dye di-8-ANEPPS and with PE-conjugated anti-EGFR or anti-tetraspanin (CD9/CD63/CD81) antibodies for estimation of EV size and surface protein copy numbers. The limits of detection (LODs) for immunofluorescence and vesicle size based on calibration using cross-calibrated, hard-dyed beads were ∼10 PE/∼80 nm EV diameter for CytoFLEX and ∼10 PEs/∼67 nm for CellStream. For the SMFC, the LOD for immunofluorescence was 1 PE and ≤ 35 nm for size. The population of EVs detected by each system (di-8-ANEPPS+/PE+ particles) differed widely depending on the LOD of the system; for example, CellStream/CytoFLEX detected only 5.7% and 1.5% of the tetraspanin-labelled EVs detected by SMFC, respectively, and median EV diameter and antibody copy numbers were much larger for CellStream/CytoFLEX than for SMFC as measured and validated using super-resolution/single-molecule TIRF microscopy. To obtain a dataset representing a common EV population analysed by all three platforms, we filtered out SMFC and CellStream measurements for EVs below the CytoFLEX LODs as determined by bead calibration (10 PE/80 nm). The inter-platform agreement using this filtered dataset was significantly better than for the unfiltered dataset, but even better concordance between results was obtained by applying higher cutoffs (21 PE/120 nm) determined by threshold analysis using the SMFC data. The results demonstrate the impact of specifying LODs to define the EV population analysed on inter-instrument reproducibility in EV flow cytometry studies, and the utility of threshold analysis of SMFC data for providing semi-quantitative LOD values for other flow cytometers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.40%
发文量
115
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is an open access research publication that focuses on extracellular vesicles, including microvesicles, exosomes, ectosomes, and apoptotic bodies. It serves as the official journal of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and aims to facilitate the exchange of data, ideas, and information pertaining to the chemistry, biology, and applications of extracellular vesicles. The journal covers various aspects such as the cellular and molecular mechanisms of extracellular vesicles biogenesis, technological advancements in their isolation, quantification, and characterization, the role and function of extracellular vesicles in biology, stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their biology, as well as the application of extracellular vesicles for pharmacological, immunological, or genetic therapies. The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is widely recognized and indexed by numerous services, including Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Current Contents/Life Sciences, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Google Scholar, ProQuest Natural Science Collection, ProQuest SciTech Collection, SciTech Premium Collection, PubMed Central/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, ScienceOpen, and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信