Tim Erdbrügger, Malte Höltershinken, Jan-Ole Radecke, Yvonne Buschermöhle, Fabrice Wallois, Sampsa Pursiainen, Joachim Gross, Rebekka Lencer, Christian Engwer, Carsten Wolters
{"title":"基于 CutFEM 的 MEG 正向建模提高了源分离性和对准径向源的敏感性:体感小组研究","authors":"Tim Erdbrügger, Malte Höltershinken, Jan-Ole Radecke, Yvonne Buschermöhle, Fabrice Wallois, Sampsa Pursiainen, Joachim Gross, Rebekka Lencer, Christian Engwer, Carsten Wolters","doi":"10.1002/hbm.26810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Source analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data requires the computation of the magnetic fields induced by current sources in the brain. This so-called MEG forward problem includes an accurate estimation of the volume conduction effects in the human head. Here, we introduce the Cut finite element method (CutFEM) for the MEG forward problem. CutFEM's meshing process imposes fewer restrictions on tissue anatomy than tetrahedral meshes while being able to mesh curved geometries contrary to hexahedral meshing. To evaluate the new approach, we compare CutFEM with a boundary element method (BEM) that distinguishes three tissue compartments and a 6-compartment hexahedral FEM in an <i>n</i> = 19 group study of somatosensory evoked fields (SEF). The neural generators of the 20 ms post-stimulus SEF components (M20) are reconstructed using both an unregularized and a regularized inversion approach. Changing the forward model resulted in reconstruction differences of about 1 centimeter in location and considerable differences in orientation. The tested 6-compartment FEM approaches significantly increase the goodness of fit to the measured data compared with the 3-compartment BEM. They also demonstrate higher quasi-radial contributions for sources below the gyral crowns. Furthermore, CutFEM improves source separability compared with both other approaches. We conclude that head models with 6 compartments rather than 3 and the new CutFEM approach are valuable additions to MEG source reconstruction, in particular for sources that are predominantly radial.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"45 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.26810","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CutFEM-based MEG forward modeling improves source separability and sensitivity to quasi-radial sources: A somatosensory group study\",\"authors\":\"Tim Erdbrügger, Malte Höltershinken, Jan-Ole Radecke, Yvonne Buschermöhle, Fabrice Wallois, Sampsa Pursiainen, Joachim Gross, Rebekka Lencer, Christian Engwer, Carsten Wolters\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.26810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Source analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data requires the computation of the magnetic fields induced by current sources in the brain. This so-called MEG forward problem includes an accurate estimation of the volume conduction effects in the human head. Here, we introduce the Cut finite element method (CutFEM) for the MEG forward problem. CutFEM's meshing process imposes fewer restrictions on tissue anatomy than tetrahedral meshes while being able to mesh curved geometries contrary to hexahedral meshing. To evaluate the new approach, we compare CutFEM with a boundary element method (BEM) that distinguishes three tissue compartments and a 6-compartment hexahedral FEM in an <i>n</i> = 19 group study of somatosensory evoked fields (SEF). The neural generators of the 20 ms post-stimulus SEF components (M20) are reconstructed using both an unregularized and a regularized inversion approach. Changing the forward model resulted in reconstruction differences of about 1 centimeter in location and considerable differences in orientation. The tested 6-compartment FEM approaches significantly increase the goodness of fit to the measured data compared with the 3-compartment BEM. They also demonstrate higher quasi-radial contributions for sources below the gyral crowns. Furthermore, CutFEM improves source separability compared with both other approaches. We conclude that head models with 6 compartments rather than 3 and the new CutFEM approach are valuable additions to MEG source reconstruction, in particular for sources that are predominantly radial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"45 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.26810\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.26810\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.26810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
脑磁图(MEG)数据的源分析需要计算大脑中电流源引起的磁场。这个所谓的 MEG 前向问题包括对人体头部体积传导效应的精确估计。在此,我们介绍用于 MEG 前向问题的 Cut 有限元方法(CutFEM)。与四面体网格法相比,CutFEM 的网格划分过程对组织解剖学的限制更少,同时与六面体网格法不同的是,它还能划分曲面几何结构。为了评估这种新方法,我们在一项关于躯体感觉诱发电场(SEF)的 n = 19 小组研究中,将 CutFEM 与区分三个组织区的边界元素法(BEM)和六区六面体有限元法进行了比较。使用非规则化和规则化反演方法重建了刺激后 20 毫秒 SEF 成分(M20)的神经发生器。改变前向模型导致重建的位置差异约为 1 厘米,方向差异相当大。与 3 室 BEM 相比,测试的 6 室 FEM 方法显著提高了与测量数据的拟合度。它们还证明了回旋冠下方的源具有更高的准径向贡献。此外,与其他两种方法相比,CutFEM 提高了声源分离度。我们的结论是,具有 6 个隔室而非 3 个隔室的头部模型和新的 CutFEM 方法是 MEG 信号源重建的重要补充,特别是对于主要为径向的信号源。
CutFEM-based MEG forward modeling improves source separability and sensitivity to quasi-radial sources: A somatosensory group study
Source analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data requires the computation of the magnetic fields induced by current sources in the brain. This so-called MEG forward problem includes an accurate estimation of the volume conduction effects in the human head. Here, we introduce the Cut finite element method (CutFEM) for the MEG forward problem. CutFEM's meshing process imposes fewer restrictions on tissue anatomy than tetrahedral meshes while being able to mesh curved geometries contrary to hexahedral meshing. To evaluate the new approach, we compare CutFEM with a boundary element method (BEM) that distinguishes three tissue compartments and a 6-compartment hexahedral FEM in an n = 19 group study of somatosensory evoked fields (SEF). The neural generators of the 20 ms post-stimulus SEF components (M20) are reconstructed using both an unregularized and a regularized inversion approach. Changing the forward model resulted in reconstruction differences of about 1 centimeter in location and considerable differences in orientation. The tested 6-compartment FEM approaches significantly increase the goodness of fit to the measured data compared with the 3-compartment BEM. They also demonstrate higher quasi-radial contributions for sources below the gyral crowns. Furthermore, CutFEM improves source separability compared with both other approaches. We conclude that head models with 6 compartments rather than 3 and the new CutFEM approach are valuable additions to MEG source reconstruction, in particular for sources that are predominantly radial.
期刊介绍:
Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged.
Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.