使用标准与增加鞘内碘化造影剂量进行双侧褥疮 CT 髓造影的安全性和技术性能。

Diogo G L Edelmuth, Renata V Leão, Eduardo Nk Filho, Marcio Np Souza, Marcelo Calderaro, Peter G Kranz
{"title":"使用标准与增加鞘内碘化造影剂量进行双侧褥疮 CT 髓造影的安全性和技术性能。","authors":"Diogo G L Edelmuth, Renata V Leão, Eduardo Nk Filho, Marcio Np Souza, Marcelo Calderaro, Peter G Kranz","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Lateral decubitus CT myelography (LDCTM) is one of the main studies for the detection of CSF-venous fistulas (CVF), but detection of CVFs is dependent on intrathecal contrast density. The purpose of this investigation was to assess tolerability and technical performance of increased intrathecal doses of myelographic contrast compared to standard doses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective series of 24 patients who underwent LDCTM following administration of either 10 or 20 ml of intrathecal iodinated contrast media (300 or 320mg/mL iodine content). Patients were scanned in the initial lateral decubitus position, then turned to the contralateral side and re-scanned in the same session. Safety and tolerability of the 20 ml dosage was assessed from clinical records. Technical performance of the studies was compared between groups by measuring attenuation values over the lateral thecal sac at standardized levels. Both the initial scan and the scan after turning to the contralateral side were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No moderate or severe adverse event was recorded in either group. The 20-ml group showed higher attenuation values, which were statistically greater on the second side examined compared to the standard-dose group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased volume of intrathecal contrast was well-tolerated and improved technical performance of LDCTM in this limited series. Further assessment of safety and impact on diagnostic yield using larger patient cohorts is warranted.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>LDCTM = lateral decubitus CT myelography; CVF = CSF-venous fistula; IOCM = iodinated contrast media.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and technical performance of bilateral decubitus CT myelography using standard versus increased intrathecal iodinated contrast volume.\",\"authors\":\"Diogo G L Edelmuth, Renata V Leão, Eduardo Nk Filho, Marcio Np Souza, Marcelo Calderaro, Peter G Kranz\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Lateral decubitus CT myelography (LDCTM) is one of the main studies for the detection of CSF-venous fistulas (CVF), but detection of CVFs is dependent on intrathecal contrast density. The purpose of this investigation was to assess tolerability and technical performance of increased intrathecal doses of myelographic contrast compared to standard doses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective series of 24 patients who underwent LDCTM following administration of either 10 or 20 ml of intrathecal iodinated contrast media (300 or 320mg/mL iodine content). Patients were scanned in the initial lateral decubitus position, then turned to the contralateral side and re-scanned in the same session. Safety and tolerability of the 20 ml dosage was assessed from clinical records. Technical performance of the studies was compared between groups by measuring attenuation values over the lateral thecal sac at standardized levels. Both the initial scan and the scan after turning to the contralateral side were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No moderate or severe adverse event was recorded in either group. The 20-ml group showed higher attenuation values, which were statistically greater on the second side examined compared to the standard-dose group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased volume of intrathecal contrast was well-tolerated and improved technical performance of LDCTM in this limited series. Further assessment of safety and impact on diagnostic yield using larger patient cohorts is warranted.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>LDCTM = lateral decubitus CT myelography; CVF = CSF-venous fistula; IOCM = iodinated contrast media.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:侧卧位 CT 髓造影(LDCTM)是检测 CSF-静脉瘘(CVF)的主要研究之一,但 CVF 的检测取决于鞘内造影剂密度。本研究旨在评估增加鞘内造影剂剂量与标准剂量相比的耐受性和技术性能:对 24 名患者进行回顾性系列研究,这些患者在使用 10 或 20 毫升鞘内碘化造影剂(碘含量为 300 或 320 毫克/毫升)后接受了 LDCTM。患者在初始侧卧位进行扫描,然后转到对侧,在同一疗程中再次扫描。根据临床记录评估 20 毫升剂量的安全性和耐受性。通过测量侧睾丸囊在标准化水平上的衰减值,比较各组之间的研究技术性能。对初始扫描和转向对侧后的扫描进行评估:结果:两组均未出现中度或严重不良反应。20毫升组显示出更高的衰减值,与标准剂量组相比,第二侧检查的衰减值在统计学上更高:结论:在这一有限的系列研究中,增加鞘内造影剂用量的耐受性良好,并提高了 LDCTM 的技术性能。有必要使用更大的患者群来进一步评估安全性和对诊断率的影响:缩写: LDCTM = 侧卧位 CT 髓造影;CVF = CSF-静脉瘘;IOCM = 碘造影剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and technical performance of bilateral decubitus CT myelography using standard versus increased intrathecal iodinated contrast volume.

Background and purpose: Lateral decubitus CT myelography (LDCTM) is one of the main studies for the detection of CSF-venous fistulas (CVF), but detection of CVFs is dependent on intrathecal contrast density. The purpose of this investigation was to assess tolerability and technical performance of increased intrathecal doses of myelographic contrast compared to standard doses.

Materials and methods: Retrospective series of 24 patients who underwent LDCTM following administration of either 10 or 20 ml of intrathecal iodinated contrast media (300 or 320mg/mL iodine content). Patients were scanned in the initial lateral decubitus position, then turned to the contralateral side and re-scanned in the same session. Safety and tolerability of the 20 ml dosage was assessed from clinical records. Technical performance of the studies was compared between groups by measuring attenuation values over the lateral thecal sac at standardized levels. Both the initial scan and the scan after turning to the contralateral side were assessed.

Results: No moderate or severe adverse event was recorded in either group. The 20-ml group showed higher attenuation values, which were statistically greater on the second side examined compared to the standard-dose group.

Conclusions: Increased volume of intrathecal contrast was well-tolerated and improved technical performance of LDCTM in this limited series. Further assessment of safety and impact on diagnostic yield using larger patient cohorts is warranted.

Abbreviations: LDCTM = lateral decubitus CT myelography; CVF = CSF-venous fistula; IOCM = iodinated contrast media.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信