交叉反应和群体免疫对 SARS-CoV-2 大流行严重程度的影响。

Infectious diseases (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1080/23744235.2024.2388222
Nana Owusu-Boaitey, Lucas Böttcher, Daihai He, Ryenchindorj Erkhembayar, Lin Yang, Dong-Hyun Kim, Anton Barchuk, David H Gorski, Jonathan Howard
{"title":"交叉反应和群体免疫对 SARS-CoV-2 大流行严重程度的影响。","authors":"Nana Owusu-Boaitey, Lucas Böttcher, Daihai He, Ryenchindorj Erkhembayar, Lin Yang, Dong-Hyun Kim, Anton Barchuk, David H Gorski, Jonathan Howard","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2024.2388222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public health systems reported low mortality from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in East Asia, in low-income countries, and for children during the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. These reports led commentators to suggest that cross-reactive immunity from prior exposure to other pathogens reduced fatality risk. Resolution of initial infection waves also contributed to speculation that herd immunity prevented further waves prior to vaccination. Serology instead implied that immunity was too limited to achieve herd immunity and that there was little impact from cross-reactive protection. Paediatric deaths exceeded those from influenza, with higher age-specific fatality risk in lower-income nations and similar fatality risk in East Asia compared with demographically similar regions. Neither pre-outbreak exposure to related pathogens nor immunity induced by initial infection waves are necessarily a reliable response to future pathogen outbreaks. Preparedness for future pathogen outbreaks should instead focus on strategies such as voluntary behavioural changes, nonpharmaceutical interventions, and vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":73372,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"897-902"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of cross-reactivity and herd immunity on SARS-CoV-2 pandemic severity.\",\"authors\":\"Nana Owusu-Boaitey, Lucas Böttcher, Daihai He, Ryenchindorj Erkhembayar, Lin Yang, Dong-Hyun Kim, Anton Barchuk, David H Gorski, Jonathan Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23744235.2024.2388222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Public health systems reported low mortality from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in East Asia, in low-income countries, and for children during the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. These reports led commentators to suggest that cross-reactive immunity from prior exposure to other pathogens reduced fatality risk. Resolution of initial infection waves also contributed to speculation that herd immunity prevented further waves prior to vaccination. Serology instead implied that immunity was too limited to achieve herd immunity and that there was little impact from cross-reactive protection. Paediatric deaths exceeded those from influenza, with higher age-specific fatality risk in lower-income nations and similar fatality risk in East Asia compared with demographically similar regions. Neither pre-outbreak exposure to related pathogens nor immunity induced by initial infection waves are necessarily a reliable response to future pathogen outbreaks. Preparedness for future pathogen outbreaks should instead focus on strategies such as voluntary behavioural changes, nonpharmaceutical interventions, and vaccination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"897-902\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2388222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2388222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据公共卫生系统报告,在严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行的第一年,东亚、低收入国家和儿童的严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)死亡率较低。这些报道使评论家们认为,先前接触其他病原体所产生的交叉反应免疫降低了死亡风险。最初感染波的消退也促使人们猜测,群体免疫在疫苗接种前可防止进一步的感染波。血清学研究则表明,免疫力太有限,无法实现群体免疫,交叉反应保护的影响也很小。儿科死亡人数超过流感死亡人数,与人口结构相似的地区相比,低收入国家特定年龄段的死亡风险较高,而东亚地区的死亡风险相似。无论是疫情爆发前接触相关病原体,还是最初感染波引起的免疫力,都不一定是对未来病原体爆发的可靠反应。对未来病原体爆发的准备工作应侧重于自愿行为改变、非药物干预和疫苗接种等策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of cross-reactivity and herd immunity on SARS-CoV-2 pandemic severity.

Public health systems reported low mortality from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in East Asia, in low-income countries, and for children during the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. These reports led commentators to suggest that cross-reactive immunity from prior exposure to other pathogens reduced fatality risk. Resolution of initial infection waves also contributed to speculation that herd immunity prevented further waves prior to vaccination. Serology instead implied that immunity was too limited to achieve herd immunity and that there was little impact from cross-reactive protection. Paediatric deaths exceeded those from influenza, with higher age-specific fatality risk in lower-income nations and similar fatality risk in East Asia compared with demographically similar regions. Neither pre-outbreak exposure to related pathogens nor immunity induced by initial infection waves are necessarily a reliable response to future pathogen outbreaks. Preparedness for future pathogen outbreaks should instead focus on strategies such as voluntary behavioural changes, nonpharmaceutical interventions, and vaccination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信