CBCT 采集方案和减少伪影过滤器对诊断垂直根部骨折的影响。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Eduarda Adams Hilgert, Gabriela Salatino Liedke, Priscila Fernanda da Silveira Tiecher, Nádia Assein Arus, Thiago de Oliveira Gamba, Heraldo Luis Dias da Silveira, Mariana Boessio Vizzotto
{"title":"CBCT 采集方案和减少伪影过滤器对诊断垂直根部骨折的影响。","authors":"Eduarda Adams Hilgert, Gabriela Salatino Liedke, Priscila Fernanda da Silveira Tiecher, Nádia Assein Arus, Thiago de Oliveira Gamba, Heraldo Luis Dias da Silveira, Mariana Boessio Vizzotto","doi":"10.1111/edt.12984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of acquisition protocols and artifact reduction filters in cone beam computed tomography on diagnosing vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth with and without intraradicular posts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 480 tomographic images acquired from two J. Morita scanners (0.125- and 0.08-mm voxel sizes protocols), with application of a blooming artifact reduction filter. Three evaluators assessed these images for root fractures using a 5-point Likert scale. Diagnostic accuracy between filters and protocols was determined using generalized linear models with binomial distribution for the outcome, considering protocol, filter, and dental status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were also estimated for the filters and protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 0.08-mm voxel size protocol demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of accurate diagnosis compared to the 0.125-mm protocol (p = .001). No statistically significant differences (p ≥ .087) were observed for filter application, interaction between protocol and filter, or dental status. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values were respectively: .93, .87, 1.00 (protocol 1); .99, .99, .99 (protocol 2); .98, .96, .99 (no filter); .95, .90, 1.00 (with filter).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new findings found for the two J Morita scanners used in our study were that images acquired using the voxel size of 0.08 mm showed an improvement in the diagnosis of root fractures and the filters in these devices have no relevance significant for the diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":55180,"journal":{"name":"Dental Traumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of CBCT acquisition protocols and artifact reduction filters on diagnosing vertical root fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Eduarda Adams Hilgert, Gabriela Salatino Liedke, Priscila Fernanda da Silveira Tiecher, Nádia Assein Arus, Thiago de Oliveira Gamba, Heraldo Luis Dias da Silveira, Mariana Boessio Vizzotto\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/edt.12984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of acquisition protocols and artifact reduction filters in cone beam computed tomography on diagnosing vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth with and without intraradicular posts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 480 tomographic images acquired from two J. Morita scanners (0.125- and 0.08-mm voxel sizes protocols), with application of a blooming artifact reduction filter. Three evaluators assessed these images for root fractures using a 5-point Likert scale. Diagnostic accuracy between filters and protocols was determined using generalized linear models with binomial distribution for the outcome, considering protocol, filter, and dental status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were also estimated for the filters and protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 0.08-mm voxel size protocol demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of accurate diagnosis compared to the 0.125-mm protocol (p = .001). No statistically significant differences (p ≥ .087) were observed for filter application, interaction between protocol and filter, or dental status. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values were respectively: .93, .87, 1.00 (protocol 1); .99, .99, .99 (protocol 2); .98, .96, .99 (no filter); .95, .90, 1.00 (with filter).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new findings found for the two J Morita scanners used in our study were that images acquired using the voxel size of 0.08 mm showed an improvement in the diagnosis of root fractures and the filters in these devices have no relevance significant for the diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Traumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12984\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估锥形束计算机断层扫描的采集协议和伪影减少过滤器对诊断根管治疗牙齿垂直根折的影响:我们分析了从两台 J. Morita 扫描仪(0.125 和 0.08 毫米体素尺寸协议)上获取的 480 幅断层图像,并使用了一个模糊伪影减少过滤器。三名评估人员采用 5 点李克特量表对这些图像进行评估,以确定是否存在牙根骨折。考虑到方案、滤波器和牙科状况,使用结果二项分布的广义线性模型确定滤波器和方案之间的诊断准确性。同时还估算了滤波器和方案的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值:结果:与 0.125 毫米方案相比,0.08 毫米体素尺寸方案的准确诊断率明显更高(p = .001)。在滤波器的应用、方案与滤波器之间的交互作用或牙齿状态方面,未观察到有统计学意义的差异(p ≥ .087)。准确度、灵敏度和特异性值分别为:.93、.87、1.00(方案 1);.99、.99、.99(方案 2);.98、.96、.99(无过滤器);.95、.90、1.00(有过滤器):我们研究中使用的两台 J Morita 扫描仪的新发现是,使用 0.08 毫米体素大小采集的图像在诊断牙根骨折方面有所改进,而这些设备中的滤波器对诊断没有重大意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of CBCT acquisition protocols and artifact reduction filters on diagnosing vertical root fractures.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of acquisition protocols and artifact reduction filters in cone beam computed tomography on diagnosing vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth with and without intraradicular posts.

Materials and methods: We analyzed 480 tomographic images acquired from two J. Morita scanners (0.125- and 0.08-mm voxel sizes protocols), with application of a blooming artifact reduction filter. Three evaluators assessed these images for root fractures using a 5-point Likert scale. Diagnostic accuracy between filters and protocols was determined using generalized linear models with binomial distribution for the outcome, considering protocol, filter, and dental status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were also estimated for the filters and protocols.

Results: The 0.08-mm voxel size protocol demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of accurate diagnosis compared to the 0.125-mm protocol (p = .001). No statistically significant differences (p ≥ .087) were observed for filter application, interaction between protocol and filter, or dental status. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values were respectively: .93, .87, 1.00 (protocol 1); .99, .99, .99 (protocol 2); .98, .96, .99 (no filter); .95, .90, 1.00 (with filter).

Conclusion: The new findings found for the two J Morita scanners used in our study were that images acquired using the voxel size of 0.08 mm showed an improvement in the diagnosis of root fractures and the filters in these devices have no relevance significant for the diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Traumatology
Dental Traumatology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
32.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Traumatology is an international journal that aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in all areas related to adult and pediatric dental traumatology. This includes the following topics: - Epidemiology, Social Aspects, Education, Diagnostics - Esthetics / Prosthetics/ Restorative - Evidence Based Traumatology & Study Design - Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery/Transplant/Implant - Pediatrics and Orthodontics - Prevention and Sports Dentistry - Endodontics and Periodontal Aspects The journal"s aim is to promote communication among clinicians, educators, researchers, and others interested in the field of dental traumatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信