美国中学中运动训练员的使用情况、社会经济地位以及种族和民族之间的关系。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Matthew J Rivera, Adrienne Willis, Omar Ramos, Justin P Young, Eliza W Barter, Eric G Post, Lindsey E Eberman
{"title":"美国中学中运动训练员的使用情况、社会经济地位以及种族和民族之间的关系。","authors":"Matthew J Rivera, Adrienne Willis, Omar Ramos, Justin P Young, Eliza W Barter, Eric G Post, Lindsey E Eberman","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0135.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Extensive research has exposed healthcare disparities regarding socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity demographics. Previous research has shown significant differences in access to athletic training services (AT access) in the secondary school setting based on SES, but with limited samples.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated differences in AT access based on race/ethnicity and SES on a national scale.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Database study using secondary analysis. Data were collected from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Athletic Training Location and Services (ATLAS) database, and US Census Bureau.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>10,983 public schools.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Descriptive data was summarized by measures of central tendency. A one-way ANOVA determined differences between school characteristics: median household income (MHI), percent of students eligible for free and reduced lunch (%FRL), percent white students, and percent non-white students based on AT access: Full-time (FT-AT), part-time (PT-AT), and no athletic trainer (no-AT). A Bonferroni pairwise comparison was used for variables with significant main effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all schools included in the study, 43.8% had no-AT (n=4,812), 23.5% had PT-AT access (n=2,581), and 32.7% had FT-AT access (n=3,590). There were significant effects between AT access and MHI (p<.001), %FLR (p<.001), percent white (p<.001), and percent non-white (p<.001). FT-AT schools had a higher SES when compared to PT-AT and no-AT schools. Significant differences existed between AT access groups and race/ethnicity of schools. Schools with FT-AT had a significantly lower percent of non-white students (31.3%) compared to schools with no-AT (46.0%) (p<.001). No significant differences between FT-AT and PT-AT based on race/ethnicity demographics presented (p≥.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Schools with higher SES had greater AT access; whereas, schools with a higher percentage of non-white students were more likely to have no AT access, demonstrating the disparities in healthcare extends to athletic healthcare as well. To increase AT access, future initiatives should address the inequities where larger minority populations and counties of lower SES exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between Athletic Trainer Access, Socioeconomic Status, and Race and Ethnicity in United States Secondary Schools.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J Rivera, Adrienne Willis, Omar Ramos, Justin P Young, Eliza W Barter, Eric G Post, Lindsey E Eberman\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1062-6050-0135.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Extensive research has exposed healthcare disparities regarding socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity demographics. Previous research has shown significant differences in access to athletic training services (AT access) in the secondary school setting based on SES, but with limited samples.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated differences in AT access based on race/ethnicity and SES on a national scale.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Database study using secondary analysis. Data were collected from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Athletic Training Location and Services (ATLAS) database, and US Census Bureau.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>10,983 public schools.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Descriptive data was summarized by measures of central tendency. A one-way ANOVA determined differences between school characteristics: median household income (MHI), percent of students eligible for free and reduced lunch (%FRL), percent white students, and percent non-white students based on AT access: Full-time (FT-AT), part-time (PT-AT), and no athletic trainer (no-AT). A Bonferroni pairwise comparison was used for variables with significant main effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all schools included in the study, 43.8% had no-AT (n=4,812), 23.5% had PT-AT access (n=2,581), and 32.7% had FT-AT access (n=3,590). There were significant effects between AT access and MHI (p<.001), %FLR (p<.001), percent white (p<.001), and percent non-white (p<.001). FT-AT schools had a higher SES when compared to PT-AT and no-AT schools. Significant differences existed between AT access groups and race/ethnicity of schools. Schools with FT-AT had a significantly lower percent of non-white students (31.3%) compared to schools with no-AT (46.0%) (p<.001). No significant differences between FT-AT and PT-AT based on race/ethnicity demographics presented (p≥.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Schools with higher SES had greater AT access; whereas, schools with a higher percentage of non-white students were more likely to have no AT access, demonstrating the disparities in healthcare extends to athletic healthcare as well. To increase AT access, future initiatives should address the inequities where larger minority populations and counties of lower SES exist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0135.24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0135.24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大量研究揭示了社会经济地位(SES)和种族/民族人口统计方面的医疗保健差异。以往的研究表明,在中学环境中,基于社会经济地位的运动训练服务(AT access)的获得存在明显差异,但样本有限:本研究在全国范围内调查了基于种族/民族和社会经济地位的运动训练服务获得情况的差异:设计:横断面研究:数据库研究,采用二次分析。数据收集自国家教育统计中心(NCES)、运动训练地点和服务(ATLAS)数据库以及美国人口普查局:10,983 所公立学校:描述性数据通过中心倾向测量进行总结。单因素方差分析确定了学校特征之间的差异:家庭收入中位数(MHI)、符合免费和减免午餐条件的学生百分比(%FRL)、白人学生百分比和非白人学生百分比:全日制(FT-AT)、非全日制(PT-AT)和无运动训练员(no-AT)。对主效应显著的变量采用 Bonferroni 配对比较法:在所有参与研究的学校中,43.8%的学校没有运动训练员(人数=4,812),23.5%的学校有兼职运动训练员(人数=2,581),32.7%的学校有全职运动训练员(人数=3,590)。获取学习辅助器具与 MHI 之间存在显着影响(p 结论:社会经济地位越高的学校,获取学习辅助器具的比例越高:社会经济地位较高的学校有更多的学生可以使用自动取物设备;而非白人学生比例较高的学校则更有可能没有自动取物设备,这表明医疗保健方面的差异也延伸到了体育医疗保健方面。为了增加获取辅助器具的机会,未来的举措应解决少数民族人口较多和社会经济地位较低的县域存在的不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship Between Athletic Trainer Access, Socioeconomic Status, and Race and Ethnicity in United States Secondary Schools.

Context: Extensive research has exposed healthcare disparities regarding socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity demographics. Previous research has shown significant differences in access to athletic training services (AT access) in the secondary school setting based on SES, but with limited samples.

Objective: This study investigated differences in AT access based on race/ethnicity and SES on a national scale.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Database study using secondary analysis. Data were collected from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Athletic Training Location and Services (ATLAS) database, and US Census Bureau.

Patients or other participants: 10,983 public schools.

Main outcome measure: Descriptive data was summarized by measures of central tendency. A one-way ANOVA determined differences between school characteristics: median household income (MHI), percent of students eligible for free and reduced lunch (%FRL), percent white students, and percent non-white students based on AT access: Full-time (FT-AT), part-time (PT-AT), and no athletic trainer (no-AT). A Bonferroni pairwise comparison was used for variables with significant main effects.

Results: Across all schools included in the study, 43.8% had no-AT (n=4,812), 23.5% had PT-AT access (n=2,581), and 32.7% had FT-AT access (n=3,590). There were significant effects between AT access and MHI (p<.001), %FLR (p<.001), percent white (p<.001), and percent non-white (p<.001). FT-AT schools had a higher SES when compared to PT-AT and no-AT schools. Significant differences existed between AT access groups and race/ethnicity of schools. Schools with FT-AT had a significantly lower percent of non-white students (31.3%) compared to schools with no-AT (46.0%) (p<.001). No significant differences between FT-AT and PT-AT based on race/ethnicity demographics presented (p≥.13).

Conclusion: Schools with higher SES had greater AT access; whereas, schools with a higher percentage of non-white students were more likely to have no AT access, demonstrating the disparities in healthcare extends to athletic healthcare as well. To increase AT access, future initiatives should address the inequities where larger minority populations and counties of lower SES exist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信