用于检测血液样本中疟原虫和巴贝斯虫 DNA 物种的实时 PCR 检测法的验证。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
{"title":"用于检测血液样本中疟原虫和巴贝斯虫 DNA 物种的实时 PCR 检测法的验证。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Malaria and babesiosis are global health threats affecting humans, wildlife, and domestic animals, particularly in Africa, the Americas, and Europe. Malaria can lead to severe outcomes, while babesiosis usually resembles a mild illness but can be severe and fatal in individuals with weakened immune systems. Swift, accurate detection of these parasites is crucial for treatment and control. We evaluated a real-time PCR assay for diagnosing five <em>Plasmodium</em> and three <em>Babesia</em> species from blood samples, assessing its sensitivity, specificity, and analytical performance by analyzing 46 malaria-positive and 32 <em>Babesia</em> spp-positive samples diagnosed through microscopy. The limit of detection for <em>Plasmodium</em> species ranged from 30 to 0.0003 copies/µL. For mixed infections, it was 0.3 copies/µL for <em>P. falciparum/P. vivax</em> and 3 copies/µL for <em>P. malariae/P. knowlesi. Babesia</em> species had a detection limit of 0.2 copies/µL. No cross-reactivity was observed among 64 DNA samples from various microorganisms. The assay showed good sensitivity, detecting <em>Plasmodium</em> and <em>Babesia</em> species with 100 % accuracy overall, except for <em>P. falciparum</em> (97.7 %) and <em>B. microti</em> (12.5 %). The low sensitivity of detecting <em>B. microti</em> was attributed to limitations in microscopy for species identification. This technique heavily relies on the proficiency of the examiner, as species within the genus cannot be distinguished under a microscope. Additionally, <em>Babesia</em> can be confused with the early trophozoite stage (ring forms) of <em>Plasmodium</em> parasites. The findings support multiplex qPCR's diagnostic superiority over the gold standard, despite higher costs. It offers enhanced sensitivity, specificity, and detects mixed infections, crucial for effective monitoring and diagnosis of malaria and babesiosis in endemic regions with significant public health challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7240,"journal":{"name":"Acta tropica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of real-time PCR assays for detecting Plasmodium and Babesia DNA species in blood samples\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actatropica.2024.107350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Malaria and babesiosis are global health threats affecting humans, wildlife, and domestic animals, particularly in Africa, the Americas, and Europe. Malaria can lead to severe outcomes, while babesiosis usually resembles a mild illness but can be severe and fatal in individuals with weakened immune systems. Swift, accurate detection of these parasites is crucial for treatment and control. We evaluated a real-time PCR assay for diagnosing five <em>Plasmodium</em> and three <em>Babesia</em> species from blood samples, assessing its sensitivity, specificity, and analytical performance by analyzing 46 malaria-positive and 32 <em>Babesia</em> spp-positive samples diagnosed through microscopy. The limit of detection for <em>Plasmodium</em> species ranged from 30 to 0.0003 copies/µL. For mixed infections, it was 0.3 copies/µL for <em>P. falciparum/P. vivax</em> and 3 copies/µL for <em>P. malariae/P. knowlesi. Babesia</em> species had a detection limit of 0.2 copies/µL. No cross-reactivity was observed among 64 DNA samples from various microorganisms. The assay showed good sensitivity, detecting <em>Plasmodium</em> and <em>Babesia</em> species with 100 % accuracy overall, except for <em>P. falciparum</em> (97.7 %) and <em>B. microti</em> (12.5 %). The low sensitivity of detecting <em>B. microti</em> was attributed to limitations in microscopy for species identification. This technique heavily relies on the proficiency of the examiner, as species within the genus cannot be distinguished under a microscope. Additionally, <em>Babesia</em> can be confused with the early trophozoite stage (ring forms) of <em>Plasmodium</em> parasites. The findings support multiplex qPCR's diagnostic superiority over the gold standard, despite higher costs. It offers enhanced sensitivity, specificity, and detects mixed infections, crucial for effective monitoring and diagnosis of malaria and babesiosis in endemic regions with significant public health challenges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta tropica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta tropica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001706X24002328\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta tropica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001706X24002328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疟疾和巴贝西亚原虫病是影响人类、野生动物和家畜的全球性健康威胁,尤其是在非洲、美国和欧洲。疟疾可能导致严重后果,而巴贝西亚原虫病通常类似于轻微的病毒性疾病,但对于免疫系统较弱的人来说,可能是严重的致命疾病。迅速、准确地检测出这些寄生虫对于治疗和控制至关重要。我们评估了从血液样本中诊断五种疟原虫和三种巴贝西亚原虫的实时 PCR 检测方法,通过分析 46 份疟疾阳性样本和 32 份通过显微镜诊断的巴贝西亚原虫阳性样本,评估了该方法的灵敏度、特异性和分析性能。疟原虫的检测限为 30 至 0.0003 拷贝/微升。在混合感染中,恶性疟原虫/间日疟原虫的检测限为 0.3 个拷贝/微升,疟疾疟原虫/克雷西疟原虫的检测限为 3 个拷贝/微升。巴贝西亚原虫的检测限为 0.2 个拷贝/微升。在 64 份来自不同微生物的 DNA 样品中未发现交叉反应。除了恶性疟原虫(97.7%)和微小疟原虫(12.5%)外,该检测方法显示出极高的灵敏度,检测疟原虫和巴贝西亚原虫的准确率达到 100%。微小疟原虫检测灵敏度低的原因是显微镜鉴定物种的局限性。这种技术在很大程度上依赖于检查人员的熟练程度,因为在显微镜下无法区分该属中的物种。此外,巴贝西亚原虫可能与疟原虫的早期滋养体阶段(环状)相混淆。尽管成本较高,但这些研究结果支持多重 qPCR 的诊断优于黄金标准。它具有更高的灵敏度和特异性,并能检测出混合感染,这对于在面临重大公共卫生挑战的疟疾流行地区有效监测和诊断疟疾和巴贝西亚原虫病至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of real-time PCR assays for detecting Plasmodium and Babesia DNA species in blood samples

Malaria and babesiosis are global health threats affecting humans, wildlife, and domestic animals, particularly in Africa, the Americas, and Europe. Malaria can lead to severe outcomes, while babesiosis usually resembles a mild illness but can be severe and fatal in individuals with weakened immune systems. Swift, accurate detection of these parasites is crucial for treatment and control. We evaluated a real-time PCR assay for diagnosing five Plasmodium and three Babesia species from blood samples, assessing its sensitivity, specificity, and analytical performance by analyzing 46 malaria-positive and 32 Babesia spp-positive samples diagnosed through microscopy. The limit of detection for Plasmodium species ranged from 30 to 0.0003 copies/µL. For mixed infections, it was 0.3 copies/µL for P. falciparum/P. vivax and 3 copies/µL for P. malariae/P. knowlesi. Babesia species had a detection limit of 0.2 copies/µL. No cross-reactivity was observed among 64 DNA samples from various microorganisms. The assay showed good sensitivity, detecting Plasmodium and Babesia species with 100 % accuracy overall, except for P. falciparum (97.7 %) and B. microti (12.5 %). The low sensitivity of detecting B. microti was attributed to limitations in microscopy for species identification. This technique heavily relies on the proficiency of the examiner, as species within the genus cannot be distinguished under a microscope. Additionally, Babesia can be confused with the early trophozoite stage (ring forms) of Plasmodium parasites. The findings support multiplex qPCR's diagnostic superiority over the gold standard, despite higher costs. It offers enhanced sensitivity, specificity, and detects mixed infections, crucial for effective monitoring and diagnosis of malaria and babesiosis in endemic regions with significant public health challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta tropica
Acta tropica 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Acta Tropica, is an international journal on infectious diseases that covers public health sciences and biomedical research with particular emphasis on topics relevant to human and animal health in the tropics and the subtropics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信