基于多轴测试的金属韧性断裂评估直接分析方法

IF 3.1 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Gabriele Cortis, Marcello Piacenti, Filippo Nalli, Luca Cortese
{"title":"基于多轴测试的金属韧性断裂评估直接分析方法","authors":"Gabriele Cortis,&nbsp;Marcello Piacenti,&nbsp;Filippo Nalli,&nbsp;Luca Cortese","doi":"10.1111/ffe.14378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prediction accuracy of ductile damage models is subject to a sound calibration strategy, which normally involves the execution of complex multiaxial tests and requires dedicated facilities. In addition, finite element (FE) analysis is mandatory to retrieve the stress and strain states at the critical point, which cannot be directly measured from experiments. To overcome this complexity, a minimal set of simple multiaxial tests is selected, and an analytical-numerical approach is proposed to evaluate, without resorting to FE, both the stress evolution with plastic deformation and the fracture strain, under any different loading condition of each test. This is achieved from the sole knowledge of the material bilinear stress–strain relation and of the applied test displacement at fracture. The obtained results are compared with a traditional testing and calibration methodology, and the robustness of the approach is proved on a 17-4PH steel, an X65 steel, and a Ti6Al4V alloy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12298,"journal":{"name":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","volume":"47 9","pages":"3408-3424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A direct analytical methodology for the assessment of ductile fracture in metals based on multiaxial tests\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Cortis,&nbsp;Marcello Piacenti,&nbsp;Filippo Nalli,&nbsp;Luca Cortese\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ffe.14378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The prediction accuracy of ductile damage models is subject to a sound calibration strategy, which normally involves the execution of complex multiaxial tests and requires dedicated facilities. In addition, finite element (FE) analysis is mandatory to retrieve the stress and strain states at the critical point, which cannot be directly measured from experiments. To overcome this complexity, a minimal set of simple multiaxial tests is selected, and an analytical-numerical approach is proposed to evaluate, without resorting to FE, both the stress evolution with plastic deformation and the fracture strain, under any different loading condition of each test. This is achieved from the sole knowledge of the material bilinear stress–strain relation and of the applied test displacement at fracture. The obtained results are compared with a traditional testing and calibration methodology, and the robustness of the approach is proved on a 17-4PH steel, an X65 steel, and a Ti6Al4V alloy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures\",\"volume\":\"47 9\",\"pages\":\"3408-3424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.14378\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.14378","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

韧性破坏模型的预测精度取决于合理的校准策略,通常需要执行复杂的多轴测试,并需要专用设备。此外,还必须进行有限元(FE)分析,以获取临界点的应力和应变状态,而这些状态无法通过试验直接测量。为了克服这种复杂性,我们选择了一组最小的简单多轴试验,并提出了一种分析-数值方法,在每个试验的任何不同加载条件下,无需借助有限元分析,即可评估塑性变形的应力演变和断裂应变。只需了解材料的双线性应力-应变关系和断裂时的测试位移,就能实现这一目标。获得的结果与传统的测试和校准方法进行了比较,并在 17-4PH 钢、X65 钢和 Ti6Al4V 合金上证明了该方法的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A direct analytical methodology for the assessment of ductile fracture in metals based on multiaxial tests

The prediction accuracy of ductile damage models is subject to a sound calibration strategy, which normally involves the execution of complex multiaxial tests and requires dedicated facilities. In addition, finite element (FE) analysis is mandatory to retrieve the stress and strain states at the critical point, which cannot be directly measured from experiments. To overcome this complexity, a minimal set of simple multiaxial tests is selected, and an analytical-numerical approach is proposed to evaluate, without resorting to FE, both the stress evolution with plastic deformation and the fracture strain, under any different loading condition of each test. This is achieved from the sole knowledge of the material bilinear stress–strain relation and of the applied test displacement at fracture. The obtained results are compared with a traditional testing and calibration methodology, and the robustness of the approach is proved on a 17-4PH steel, an X65 steel, and a Ti6Al4V alloy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
256
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (FFEMS) encompasses the broad topic of structural integrity which is founded on the mechanics of fatigue and fracture, and is concerned with the reliability and effectiveness of various materials and structural components of any scale or geometry. The editors publish original contributions that will stimulate the intellectual innovation that generates elegant, effective and economic engineering designs. The journal is interdisciplinary and includes papers from scientists and engineers in the fields of materials science, mechanics, physics, chemistry, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信