Josef Hanekom, Karen Ebersohn, Lisa Penzhorn, Melvyn Quan, Andrew Leisewitz, Alan Guthrie, Geoffrey T. Fosgate
{"title":"南非农场犬只接触受感染羊群后感染蓝舌病病毒的情况","authors":"Josef Hanekom, Karen Ebersohn, Lisa Penzhorn, Melvyn Quan, Andrew Leisewitz, Alan Guthrie, Geoffrey T. Fosgate","doi":"10.1155/2024/2446398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>In 2021, a pregnant Rottweiler dog living on a sheep farm was diagnosed with clinical bluetongue (BT) infection. This study reports on the investigation of this farm where bluetongue virus (BTV) infection was diagnosed in this atypical host species. Samples were collected during farm visits 14, 28, 60, and 89 days after the onset of clinical signs in the pregnant Rottweiler. Blood was collected from all farm dogs (<i>n</i> = 6) and tested for BTV genome using a reverse-transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay and BTV antibodies with the competitive ELISA (cELISA) and dogs positive by RT-qPCR were further tested using virus neutralization (VN) serological testing. Blood was also collected from 16 sick sheep and tested using RT-qPCR. Midges were trapped on the study farm using an Onderstepoort UV light trap placed above a sheep pen for 36 hr at the first farm (14 days) visit. Parous/gravid midges were tested by BTV RT-qPCR in batches of up to 200 midges per species. Blood-fed midges (<i>n</i> = 308) were tested using a PCR species probe (KAPA Multiplex Master Mix) to identify the host species on which the midge had fed. Three dogs (<i>n</i> = 3/6) had detectable BTV RNA with RT-qPCR and high VN antibody titers to BTV. All RT-qPCR-positive dogs and one additional dog tested cELISA seropositive (<i>n</i> = 4/6). Bluetongue virus RNA was detected in 5/16 sheep tested. The most abundant midge species was <i>Culicoides imicola</i> (99.3%) and BTV was only detected in this species (<i>n</i> = 3/4 batches of 200 parous midges). Dog blood was not detected in any blood-fed midges tested. The occurrence of natural BT viraemia in exposed dogs creates a potential risk of BTV entry into BT-free countries through dog importation. It remains unclear whether BT viremia in dogs is capable of onward transmission.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2446398","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bluetongue Virus Infection in Farm Dogs Exposed to an Infected Sheep Flock in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Josef Hanekom, Karen Ebersohn, Lisa Penzhorn, Melvyn Quan, Andrew Leisewitz, Alan Guthrie, Geoffrey T. Fosgate\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/2446398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>In 2021, a pregnant Rottweiler dog living on a sheep farm was diagnosed with clinical bluetongue (BT) infection. This study reports on the investigation of this farm where bluetongue virus (BTV) infection was diagnosed in this atypical host species. Samples were collected during farm visits 14, 28, 60, and 89 days after the onset of clinical signs in the pregnant Rottweiler. Blood was collected from all farm dogs (<i>n</i> = 6) and tested for BTV genome using a reverse-transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay and BTV antibodies with the competitive ELISA (cELISA) and dogs positive by RT-qPCR were further tested using virus neutralization (VN) serological testing. Blood was also collected from 16 sick sheep and tested using RT-qPCR. Midges were trapped on the study farm using an Onderstepoort UV light trap placed above a sheep pen for 36 hr at the first farm (14 days) visit. Parous/gravid midges were tested by BTV RT-qPCR in batches of up to 200 midges per species. Blood-fed midges (<i>n</i> = 308) were tested using a PCR species probe (KAPA Multiplex Master Mix) to identify the host species on which the midge had fed. Three dogs (<i>n</i> = 3/6) had detectable BTV RNA with RT-qPCR and high VN antibody titers to BTV. All RT-qPCR-positive dogs and one additional dog tested cELISA seropositive (<i>n</i> = 4/6). Bluetongue virus RNA was detected in 5/16 sheep tested. The most abundant midge species was <i>Culicoides imicola</i> (99.3%) and BTV was only detected in this species (<i>n</i> = 3/4 batches of 200 parous midges). Dog blood was not detected in any blood-fed midges tested. The occurrence of natural BT viraemia in exposed dogs creates a potential risk of BTV entry into BT-free countries through dog importation. It remains unclear whether BT viremia in dogs is capable of onward transmission.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2446398\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2446398\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2446398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bluetongue Virus Infection in Farm Dogs Exposed to an Infected Sheep Flock in South Africa
In 2021, a pregnant Rottweiler dog living on a sheep farm was diagnosed with clinical bluetongue (BT) infection. This study reports on the investigation of this farm where bluetongue virus (BTV) infection was diagnosed in this atypical host species. Samples were collected during farm visits 14, 28, 60, and 89 days after the onset of clinical signs in the pregnant Rottweiler. Blood was collected from all farm dogs (n = 6) and tested for BTV genome using a reverse-transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay and BTV antibodies with the competitive ELISA (cELISA) and dogs positive by RT-qPCR were further tested using virus neutralization (VN) serological testing. Blood was also collected from 16 sick sheep and tested using RT-qPCR. Midges were trapped on the study farm using an Onderstepoort UV light trap placed above a sheep pen for 36 hr at the first farm (14 days) visit. Parous/gravid midges were tested by BTV RT-qPCR in batches of up to 200 midges per species. Blood-fed midges (n = 308) were tested using a PCR species probe (KAPA Multiplex Master Mix) to identify the host species on which the midge had fed. Three dogs (n = 3/6) had detectable BTV RNA with RT-qPCR and high VN antibody titers to BTV. All RT-qPCR-positive dogs and one additional dog tested cELISA seropositive (n = 4/6). Bluetongue virus RNA was detected in 5/16 sheep tested. The most abundant midge species was Culicoides imicola (99.3%) and BTV was only detected in this species (n = 3/4 batches of 200 parous midges). Dog blood was not detected in any blood-fed midges tested. The occurrence of natural BT viraemia in exposed dogs creates a potential risk of BTV entry into BT-free countries through dog importation. It remains unclear whether BT viremia in dogs is capable of onward transmission.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.