碳税与西班牙城乡家庭在地区层面上的相关脆弱性

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Marina Sánchez-Serrano , Jorge Zafrilla , Mateo Ortiz , Guadalupe Arce
{"title":"碳税与西班牙城乡家庭在地区层面上的相关脆弱性","authors":"Marina Sánchez-Serrano ,&nbsp;Jorge Zafrilla ,&nbsp;Mateo Ortiz ,&nbsp;Guadalupe Arce","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Consumer decisions are essential in reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions released by human activities. Climate policies aimed at reducing consumers' carbon footprint require societal embrace and leaving no one behind; however, they often negatively affect low-income families and rural households with limited access to low-carbon consumption choices. In this paper, we estimate households' carbon footprint in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) by urban-rural location and expenditure attributes and simulate the impacts of a carbon tax on the disposable income of different types of households. A novel multiregional input-output model is proposed to assign global carbon footprints to products (instead of industries), leading us to identify the main driving goods in the carbon footprint of each type of household, evaluating the household's vulnerability after carbon taxation. Our findings suggest that high-spending households would face the taxation strongest effects on car fuels and transport services, as they would have an impact of 2 % of their total expenditure by the taxation on these products, while this effect in lower-income households would be 0,75 %. A tax on basic housing services (electricity and heating) would have a regressive impact, undermining the consumption level of vulnerable households. They would be affected by 2,5 %, while higher income households would spend between 1 and 1,5 % of their total expenditure on paying the carbon tax on this product. This heterogeneity across households leads us to recommend taxes and compensation mechanisms charged on adequate products to reduce the carbon footprint of households while avoiding the regressivity of climate policies and reducing urban-rural inequalities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"16 10","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003342/pdfft?md5=b0b97f61decd6d2d4d8fc89c641653fa&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224003342-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon taxation and related vulnerability of Spanish urban and rural households in a regional level\",\"authors\":\"Marina Sánchez-Serrano ,&nbsp;Jorge Zafrilla ,&nbsp;Mateo Ortiz ,&nbsp;Guadalupe Arce\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Consumer decisions are essential in reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions released by human activities. Climate policies aimed at reducing consumers' carbon footprint require societal embrace and leaving no one behind; however, they often negatively affect low-income families and rural households with limited access to low-carbon consumption choices. In this paper, we estimate households' carbon footprint in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) by urban-rural location and expenditure attributes and simulate the impacts of a carbon tax on the disposable income of different types of households. A novel multiregional input-output model is proposed to assign global carbon footprints to products (instead of industries), leading us to identify the main driving goods in the carbon footprint of each type of household, evaluating the household's vulnerability after carbon taxation. Our findings suggest that high-spending households would face the taxation strongest effects on car fuels and transport services, as they would have an impact of 2 % of their total expenditure by the taxation on these products, while this effect in lower-income households would be 0,75 %. A tax on basic housing services (electricity and heating) would have a regressive impact, undermining the consumption level of vulnerable households. They would be affected by 2,5 %, while higher income households would spend between 1 and 1,5 % of their total expenditure on paying the carbon tax on this product. This heterogeneity across households leads us to recommend taxes and compensation mechanisms charged on adequate products to reduce the carbon footprint of households while avoiding the regressivity of climate policies and reducing urban-rural inequalities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Science Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 100123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003342/pdfft?md5=b0b97f61decd6d2d4d8fc89c641653fa&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224003342-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Science Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

消费者的决定对减少人类活动排放的二氧化碳至关重要。旨在减少消费者碳足迹的气候政策需要全社会的支持和不遗漏任何一个人;然而,这些政策往往对低收入家庭和农村家庭产生负面影响,因为这些家庭获得低碳消费选择的机会有限。在本文中,我们按城乡位置和支出属性估算了卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰(西班牙)家庭的碳足迹,并模拟了碳税对不同类型家庭可支配收入的影响。我们提出了一种新颖的多区域投入产出模型,将全球碳足迹分配给产品(而不是行业),从而确定了各类家庭碳足迹的主要驱动产品,评估了征收碳税后家庭的脆弱性。我们的研究结果表明,对汽车燃料和交通服务征税对高消费家庭的影响最大,因为对这些产品征税将影响其总支出的 2%,而对低收入家庭的影响仅为 0.75%。对基本住房服务(电力和供暖)征税将产生累退影响,削弱弱势家庭的消费水平。他们将受到 2.5 % 的影响,而高收入家庭将花费其总支出的 1 % 至 1.5 % 用于支付该产品的碳税。家庭之间的这种异质性促使我们建议对适当的产品征税并建立补偿机制,以减少家庭的碳足迹,同时避免气候政策的累退性并减少城乡不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon taxation and related vulnerability of Spanish urban and rural households in a regional level

Consumer decisions are essential in reducing CO2 emissions released by human activities. Climate policies aimed at reducing consumers' carbon footprint require societal embrace and leaving no one behind; however, they often negatively affect low-income families and rural households with limited access to low-carbon consumption choices. In this paper, we estimate households' carbon footprint in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) by urban-rural location and expenditure attributes and simulate the impacts of a carbon tax on the disposable income of different types of households. A novel multiregional input-output model is proposed to assign global carbon footprints to products (instead of industries), leading us to identify the main driving goods in the carbon footprint of each type of household, evaluating the household's vulnerability after carbon taxation. Our findings suggest that high-spending households would face the taxation strongest effects on car fuels and transport services, as they would have an impact of 2 % of their total expenditure by the taxation on these products, while this effect in lower-income households would be 0,75 %. A tax on basic housing services (electricity and heating) would have a regressive impact, undermining the consumption level of vulnerable households. They would be affected by 2,5 %, while higher income households would spend between 1 and 1,5 % of their total expenditure on paying the carbon tax on this product. This heterogeneity across households leads us to recommend taxes and compensation mechanisms charged on adequate products to reduce the carbon footprint of households while avoiding the regressivity of climate policies and reducing urban-rural inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信