基于认知诊断的学生数学能力个性化评价信息研究

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Xiaopeng Wu , Tianshu Xu , Rongxiu Wu
{"title":"基于认知诊断的学生数学能力个性化评价信息研究","authors":"Xiaopeng Wu ,&nbsp;Tianshu Xu ,&nbsp;Rongxiu Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With a set of the <em>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</em> (TIMSS) 2015 test items as the assessment tool, this study constructed a mathematics competency assessment framework composed of eight attributes, and formed a Q matrix using data of 4,733 students in the four provinces (cities) of mainland China. Through model comparisons, this study selected the mixed model and made in-depth analyses of attribute mastery from four aspects: international comparative analysis, learning path analysis, learning progression construction, and personalized report development. The study found obvious advantages in most attributes of Chinese students’ basic mathematics competencies. The learning path was rich with large knowledge status distributed in the second, third, and fourth level of learning progression. It provided a basis for a detailed understanding of the basic mathematics competencies of Chinese students and their current situation in international education. It also provided a methodological basis for the cognitive diagnosis assessment of students’ mathematics competencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101596"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on personalized assessment Information of students' mathematical competency based on cognitive diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Xiaopeng Wu ,&nbsp;Tianshu Xu ,&nbsp;Rongxiu Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With a set of the <em>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</em> (TIMSS) 2015 test items as the assessment tool, this study constructed a mathematics competency assessment framework composed of eight attributes, and formed a Q matrix using data of 4,733 students in the four provinces (cities) of mainland China. Through model comparisons, this study selected the mixed model and made in-depth analyses of attribute mastery from four aspects: international comparative analysis, learning path analysis, learning progression construction, and personalized report development. The study found obvious advantages in most attributes of Chinese students’ basic mathematics competencies. The learning path was rich with large knowledge status distributed in the second, third, and fourth level of learning progression. It provided a basis for a detailed understanding of the basic mathematics competencies of Chinese students and their current situation in international education. It also provided a methodological basis for the cognitive diagnosis assessment of students’ mathematics competencies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001342\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001342","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以2015年国际数学与科学研究趋势(TIMSS)的一套测试项目为评价工具,构建了由八个属性组成的数学能力评价框架,并利用中国大陆四省(市)4733名学生的数据形成了Q矩阵。通过模型比较,本研究选择了混合模型,并从国际比较分析、学习路径分析、学习进阶构建、个性化报告开发四个方面对属性掌握情况进行了深入分析。研究发现,中国学生数学基础能力的大部分属性优势明显。学习路径丰富,知识量大,分布在学习进阶的第二、三、四层。该研究为详细了解中国学生的数学基础能力及其在国际教育中的现状提供了依据。它还为学生数学能力的认知诊断评估提供了方法论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on personalized assessment Information of students' mathematical competency based on cognitive diagnosis

With a set of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2015 test items as the assessment tool, this study constructed a mathematics competency assessment framework composed of eight attributes, and formed a Q matrix using data of 4,733 students in the four provinces (cities) of mainland China. Through model comparisons, this study selected the mixed model and made in-depth analyses of attribute mastery from four aspects: international comparative analysis, learning path analysis, learning progression construction, and personalized report development. The study found obvious advantages in most attributes of Chinese students’ basic mathematics competencies. The learning path was rich with large knowledge status distributed in the second, third, and fourth level of learning progression. It provided a basis for a detailed understanding of the basic mathematics competencies of Chinese students and their current situation in international education. It also provided a methodological basis for the cognitive diagnosis assessment of students’ mathematics competencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信