心力衰竭的联合利尿疗法:来自 GUIDE-IT 的启示

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jeffery Budweg , Mustafa M. Ahmed , Juan R. Vilaro , Mohammad A. Al-Ani , Juan M. Aranda Jr , Yi Guo , Ang Li , Sandip Patel , Alex M. Parker
{"title":"心力衰竭的联合利尿疗法:来自 GUIDE-IT 的启示","authors":"Jeffery Budweg ,&nbsp;Mustafa M. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Juan R. Vilaro ,&nbsp;Mohammad A. Al-Ani ,&nbsp;Juan M. Aranda Jr ,&nbsp;Yi Guo ,&nbsp;Ang Li ,&nbsp;Sandip Patel ,&nbsp;Alex M. Parker","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diuretics are the mainstay of maintaining and restoring euvolemia in the management of heart failure. Loop diuretics are often preferred, however, combination diuretic therapy (CDT) with a thiazide diuretic is often used to overcome diuretic resistance and increase diuretic effect. We performed an analysis of the GUIDE-IT study to assess all-cause mortality and time to first hospitalizations in patients necessitating CDT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients from the GUIDE-IT dataset were stratified by their requirement for CDT with a thiazide to achieve euvolemia. A total of 894 patients were analyzed, 733 of which were treated with loop diuretics alone vs 161 used either chlorothiazide or metolazone in addition to loop diuretics. Kaplan-Meir curves were derived with log-rank <em>p</em>-values to evaluate for differences between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality regardless of CDT utilization status (mean survival of 612.704 days vs 603.326 days, <em>p</em> = 0.083). On subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality amongst those using loop diuretics compared to CDT in the BNP-guided therapy group, (mean survival time 576.385 days vs 620.585 days, <em>p</em> = 0.0523), nor the control group (614.1 days vs 588.9 days; <em>p</em> = 0.5728). Time to first hospitalization was reduced in all using CDT compared to loop diuretics alone (280.5 days vs 407.2 days, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). On subgroup analysis, both the BNP-guided group as well as the control group had reduced time to first hospitalization in the CDT group compared to those who did not require CDT (BNP group: 287.503 days vs 402.475 days, <em>p</em> ≤0.0001; control group 248.698 days vs 399.035 days, <em>p</em> = 0.0009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Use of CDT is associated with earlier time to hospitalization, though no association was identified with increased all-cause mortality. Further prospective studies are likely needed to determine the true risk and benefits of combination diuretic therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400079X/pdfft?md5=286071745bf1d2e77b4c6dfd626c8222&pid=1-s2.0-S266660222400079X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination diuretic therapies in heart failure: Insights from GUIDE-IT\",\"authors\":\"Jeffery Budweg ,&nbsp;Mustafa M. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Juan R. Vilaro ,&nbsp;Mohammad A. Al-Ani ,&nbsp;Juan M. Aranda Jr ,&nbsp;Yi Guo ,&nbsp;Ang Li ,&nbsp;Sandip Patel ,&nbsp;Alex M. Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diuretics are the mainstay of maintaining and restoring euvolemia in the management of heart failure. Loop diuretics are often preferred, however, combination diuretic therapy (CDT) with a thiazide diuretic is often used to overcome diuretic resistance and increase diuretic effect. We performed an analysis of the GUIDE-IT study to assess all-cause mortality and time to first hospitalizations in patients necessitating CDT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients from the GUIDE-IT dataset were stratified by their requirement for CDT with a thiazide to achieve euvolemia. A total of 894 patients were analyzed, 733 of which were treated with loop diuretics alone vs 161 used either chlorothiazide or metolazone in addition to loop diuretics. Kaplan-Meir curves were derived with log-rank <em>p</em>-values to evaluate for differences between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality regardless of CDT utilization status (mean survival of 612.704 days vs 603.326 days, <em>p</em> = 0.083). On subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality amongst those using loop diuretics compared to CDT in the BNP-guided therapy group, (mean survival time 576.385 days vs 620.585 days, <em>p</em> = 0.0523), nor the control group (614.1 days vs 588.9 days; <em>p</em> = 0.5728). Time to first hospitalization was reduced in all using CDT compared to loop diuretics alone (280.5 days vs 407.2 days, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). On subgroup analysis, both the BNP-guided group as well as the control group had reduced time to first hospitalization in the CDT group compared to those who did not require CDT (BNP group: 287.503 days vs 402.475 days, <em>p</em> ≤0.0001; control group 248.698 days vs 399.035 days, <em>p</em> = 0.0009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Use of CDT is associated with earlier time to hospitalization, though no association was identified with increased all-cause mortality. Further prospective studies are likely needed to determine the true risk and benefits of combination diuretic therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400079X/pdfft?md5=286071745bf1d2e77b4c6dfd626c8222&pid=1-s2.0-S266660222400079X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400079X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400079X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在治疗心力衰竭的过程中,利尿剂是维持和恢复血容量的主要药物。襻利尿剂通常是首选药物,但为了克服利尿剂耐药性并提高利尿效果,通常会使用噻嗪类利尿剂联合利尿疗法(CDT)。我们对 GUIDE-IT 研究进行了分析,以评估需要 CDT 患者的全因死亡率和首次住院时间。共对 894 例患者进行了分析,其中 733 例患者仅使用襻利尿剂,161 例患者在使用襻利尿剂的同时还使用了氯噻嗪或美托拉宗。结果无论使用 CDT 与否,全因死亡率均无显著差异(平均生存期为 612.704 天 vs 603.326 天,p = 0.083)。在亚组分析中,使用襻利尿剂的患者与使用 CDT 的 BNP 指导治疗组(平均存活时间为 576.385 天 vs 620.585 天,p = 0.0523)和对照组(614.1 天 vs 588.9 天;p = 0.5728)相比,全因死亡率无明显差异。与单独使用襻利尿剂相比,所有使用 CDT 的患者首次住院时间都缩短了(280.5 天 vs 407.2 天,p < 0.0001)。亚组分析显示,与不需要 CDT 的患者相比,BNP 引导组和对照组的 CDT 患者首次住院时间均有所缩短(BNP 组:287.503 天 vs 402.475 天,p ≤0.0001;对照组 248.698 天 vs 399.035 天,p = 0.0009)。要确定联合利尿疗法的真正风险和益处,可能还需要进一步的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination diuretic therapies in heart failure: Insights from GUIDE-IT

Introduction

Diuretics are the mainstay of maintaining and restoring euvolemia in the management of heart failure. Loop diuretics are often preferred, however, combination diuretic therapy (CDT) with a thiazide diuretic is often used to overcome diuretic resistance and increase diuretic effect. We performed an analysis of the GUIDE-IT study to assess all-cause mortality and time to first hospitalizations in patients necessitating CDT.

Methods

Patients from the GUIDE-IT dataset were stratified by their requirement for CDT with a thiazide to achieve euvolemia. A total of 894 patients were analyzed, 733 of which were treated with loop diuretics alone vs 161 used either chlorothiazide or metolazone in addition to loop diuretics. Kaplan-Meir curves were derived with log-rank p-values to evaluate for differences between the groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality regardless of CDT utilization status (mean survival of 612.704 days vs 603.326 days, p = 0.083). On subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality amongst those using loop diuretics compared to CDT in the BNP-guided therapy group, (mean survival time 576.385 days vs 620.585 days, p = 0.0523), nor the control group (614.1 days vs 588.9 days; p = 0.5728). Time to first hospitalization was reduced in all using CDT compared to loop diuretics alone (280.5 days vs 407.2 days, p < 0.0001). On subgroup analysis, both the BNP-guided group as well as the control group had reduced time to first hospitalization in the CDT group compared to those who did not require CDT (BNP group: 287.503 days vs 402.475 days, p ≤0.0001; control group 248.698 days vs 399.035 days, p = 0.0009).

Conclusion

Use of CDT is associated with earlier time to hospitalization, though no association was identified with increased all-cause mortality. Further prospective studies are likely needed to determine the true risk and benefits of combination diuretic therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信