{"title":"通过生命周期评估揭示中国农业土壤修复战略的环境效益和影响因素","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable remediation is crucial for agricultural soil in China as 19.4 % of soil samples are contaminated by toxic substances. Current remediation strategies, classification management and pollution grading, cannot support sustainable remediation because of lacking refined zoning and over-engineering. To address these shortcomings, we synthesized a new strategy: classification, grading, and zoning (CGZ), and performed a life cycle assessment to determine its benefits. The results showed that the CGZ strategy reduced environmental impacts by 24 % and 19 % when applied in 1.45 km<sup>2</sup> of contaminated land (3 years from survey to remediation). These reductions were attributed to optimizing remediation technologies for various planting zones and minimizing the remediation area through balancing the primary and secondary impacts of pre-surveys and the remediation itself. Meanwhile, sustaining these remediation efforts over the long term must include equitable farmer compensation based on crop type to mitigate future environmental consequences associated with farmers switching crops.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment to unravel environmental benefits and influencing factors of agricultural soil remediation strategies in China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sustainable remediation is crucial for agricultural soil in China as 19.4 % of soil samples are contaminated by toxic substances. Current remediation strategies, classification management and pollution grading, cannot support sustainable remediation because of lacking refined zoning and over-engineering. To address these shortcomings, we synthesized a new strategy: classification, grading, and zoning (CGZ), and performed a life cycle assessment to determine its benefits. The results showed that the CGZ strategy reduced environmental impacts by 24 % and 19 % when applied in 1.45 km<sup>2</sup> of contaminated land (3 years from survey to remediation). These reductions were attributed to optimizing remediation technologies for various planting zones and minimizing the remediation area through balancing the primary and secondary impacts of pre-surveys and the remediation itself. Meanwhile, sustaining these remediation efforts over the long term must include equitable farmer compensation based on crop type to mitigate future environmental consequences associated with farmers switching crops.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924004439\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924004439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Life cycle assessment to unravel environmental benefits and influencing factors of agricultural soil remediation strategies in China
Sustainable remediation is crucial for agricultural soil in China as 19.4 % of soil samples are contaminated by toxic substances. Current remediation strategies, classification management and pollution grading, cannot support sustainable remediation because of lacking refined zoning and over-engineering. To address these shortcomings, we synthesized a new strategy: classification, grading, and zoning (CGZ), and performed a life cycle assessment to determine its benefits. The results showed that the CGZ strategy reduced environmental impacts by 24 % and 19 % when applied in 1.45 km2 of contaminated land (3 years from survey to remediation). These reductions were attributed to optimizing remediation technologies for various planting zones and minimizing the remediation area through balancing the primary and secondary impacts of pre-surveys and the remediation itself. Meanwhile, sustaining these remediation efforts over the long term must include equitable farmer compensation based on crop type to mitigate future environmental consequences associated with farmers switching crops.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.