具有规定输出跟踪性能的磁悬浮系统的模型预测控制

IF 5.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Benedikt Oppeneiger , Lukas Lanza , Maximilian Schell , Dario Dennstädt , Manuel Schaller , Bert Zamzow , Thomas Berger , Karl Worthmann
{"title":"具有规定输出跟踪性能的磁悬浮系统的模型预测控制","authors":"Benedikt Oppeneiger ,&nbsp;Lukas Lanza ,&nbsp;Maximilian Schell ,&nbsp;Dario Dennstädt ,&nbsp;Manuel Schaller ,&nbsp;Bert Zamzow ,&nbsp;Thomas Berger ,&nbsp;Karl Worthmann","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To guarantee the safe and dependable operation of a magnetic levitation train, the distance between the magnet and the reaction rail needs to be kept within a given range. In this work, we design model predictive controllers which, in addition to complying with these constraints, provide a favorable behavior with regard to performance criteria such as travel comfort and control effort. For this purpose, we present a model of the system and the disturbances affecting it. Several results regarding the mathematical properties of this model are proven to gain insight for controller design. Finally we compare three different controllers w.r.t. performance criteria such as robustness, travel comfort, control effort, and computation time in an extensive numerical simulation study: a linear feedback controller, a model predictive control (MPC) scheme with quadratic stage costs, and the recently-proposed funnel MPC scheme. We show that the MPC closed loop complies with the constraints while also exhibiting excellent performance. Furthermore, we implement the MPC algorithms within the <span>GRAMPC</span> framework. This allows us to reduce the computational effort to a point at which real-time application becomes feasible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124001771/pdfft?md5=d0fc476f063c82ac7097bcc00e456750&pid=1-s2.0-S0967066124001771-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model predictive control of a magnetic levitation system with prescribed output tracking performance\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt Oppeneiger ,&nbsp;Lukas Lanza ,&nbsp;Maximilian Schell ,&nbsp;Dario Dennstädt ,&nbsp;Manuel Schaller ,&nbsp;Bert Zamzow ,&nbsp;Thomas Berger ,&nbsp;Karl Worthmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To guarantee the safe and dependable operation of a magnetic levitation train, the distance between the magnet and the reaction rail needs to be kept within a given range. In this work, we design model predictive controllers which, in addition to complying with these constraints, provide a favorable behavior with regard to performance criteria such as travel comfort and control effort. For this purpose, we present a model of the system and the disturbances affecting it. Several results regarding the mathematical properties of this model are proven to gain insight for controller design. Finally we compare three different controllers w.r.t. performance criteria such as robustness, travel comfort, control effort, and computation time in an extensive numerical simulation study: a linear feedback controller, a model predictive control (MPC) scheme with quadratic stage costs, and the recently-proposed funnel MPC scheme. We show that the MPC closed loop complies with the constraints while also exhibiting excellent performance. Furthermore, we implement the MPC algorithms within the <span>GRAMPC</span> framework. This allows us to reduce the computational effort to a point at which real-time application becomes feasible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124001771/pdfft?md5=d0fc476f063c82ac7097bcc00e456750&pid=1-s2.0-S0967066124001771-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124001771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124001771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了保证磁悬浮列车安全可靠地运行,磁铁与反作用力轨道之间的距离必须保持在给定范围内。在这项工作中,我们设计了模型预测控制器,除了能满足这些约束条件外,还能在行驶舒适度和控制力度等性能标准方面提供良好的表现。为此,我们提出了一个系统模型和对其产生影响的干扰。有关该模型数学特性的一些结果得到了证实,从而为控制器的设计提供了启示。最后,我们在大量的数值模拟研究中比较了三种不同控制器的性能标准,如鲁棒性、旅行舒适度、控制工作量和计算时间:线性反馈控制器、具有二次阶段成本的模型预测控制(MPC)方案和最近提出的漏斗式 MPC 方案。我们证明,MPC 闭环符合约束条件,同时还表现出卓越的性能。此外,我们还在 GRAMPC 框架内实现了 MPC 算法。这使我们能够减少计算量,使实时应用变得可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model predictive control of a magnetic levitation system with prescribed output tracking performance

To guarantee the safe and dependable operation of a magnetic levitation train, the distance between the magnet and the reaction rail needs to be kept within a given range. In this work, we design model predictive controllers which, in addition to complying with these constraints, provide a favorable behavior with regard to performance criteria such as travel comfort and control effort. For this purpose, we present a model of the system and the disturbances affecting it. Several results regarding the mathematical properties of this model are proven to gain insight for controller design. Finally we compare three different controllers w.r.t. performance criteria such as robustness, travel comfort, control effort, and computation time in an extensive numerical simulation study: a linear feedback controller, a model predictive control (MPC) scheme with quadratic stage costs, and the recently-proposed funnel MPC scheme. We show that the MPC closed loop complies with the constraints while also exhibiting excellent performance. Furthermore, we implement the MPC algorithms within the GRAMPC framework. This allows us to reduce the computational effort to a point at which real-time application becomes feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Control Engineering Practice
Control Engineering Practice 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
12.20%
发文量
183
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper. The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC. Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信