架空导管车是否被视为合法并得到认可?来自德国的证据

IF 7.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
{"title":"架空导管车是否被视为合法并得到认可?来自德国的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2024.104323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Catenary trucks (CT) are part of electric road systems (ERS) and allow charging while driving, i.e. dynamic charging. ERS can contribute to the decarbonization of heavy road transport, as direct electric concepts have the best climate balance compared to alternative technologies. Catenary systems are being tested in real operation in Germany.</p><p>In this paper, we analyze the perceived legitimacy and social acceptance of CT systems in German society. To answer the research question, we look at industry actors, the general population, and local residents of a field test and combine different qualitative methods in an innovative multi-method approach.</p><p>We find that both the legitimacy and the acceptance of the technology are poor in Germany, i.e., structural and behavioral factors need to be changed to accommodate the technology. While manufacturers were primarily concerned with efficiency and costs, local citizens were concerned with traffic impact and safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924002803/pdfft?md5=2ab624330e7c7db907b87799066af520&pid=1-s2.0-S1361920924002803-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are overhead catenary trucks perceived as legitimate and accepted? Evidence from Germany\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2024.104323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Catenary trucks (CT) are part of electric road systems (ERS) and allow charging while driving, i.e. dynamic charging. ERS can contribute to the decarbonization of heavy road transport, as direct electric concepts have the best climate balance compared to alternative technologies. Catenary systems are being tested in real operation in Germany.</p><p>In this paper, we analyze the perceived legitimacy and social acceptance of CT systems in German society. To answer the research question, we look at industry actors, the general population, and local residents of a field test and combine different qualitative methods in an innovative multi-method approach.</p><p>We find that both the legitimacy and the acceptance of the technology are poor in Germany, i.e., structural and behavioral factors need to be changed to accommodate the technology. While manufacturers were primarily concerned with efficiency and costs, local citizens were concerned with traffic impact and safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924002803/pdfft?md5=2ab624330e7c7db907b87799066af520&pid=1-s2.0-S1361920924002803-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924002803\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924002803","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

悬挂式卡车(CT)是电动道路系统(ERS)的一部分,可在行驶过程中充电,即动态充电。由于直接电动概念与替代技术相比具有最佳的气候平衡性,因此 ERS 可为重型公路运输的去碳化做出贡献。在本文中,我们将分析德国社会对 CT 系统的合理性和社会接受度。为了回答这个研究问题,我们对行业参与者、普通民众和实地测试的当地居民进行了调查,并通过创新的多种方法结合了不同的定性方法。我们发现,在德国,该技术的合法性和接受度都很低,也就是说,需要改变结构和行为因素来适应该技术。制造商主要关注效率和成本,而当地市民则关注交通影响和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are overhead catenary trucks perceived as legitimate and accepted? Evidence from Germany

Catenary trucks (CT) are part of electric road systems (ERS) and allow charging while driving, i.e. dynamic charging. ERS can contribute to the decarbonization of heavy road transport, as direct electric concepts have the best climate balance compared to alternative technologies. Catenary systems are being tested in real operation in Germany.

In this paper, we analyze the perceived legitimacy and social acceptance of CT systems in German society. To answer the research question, we look at industry actors, the general population, and local residents of a field test and combine different qualitative methods in an innovative multi-method approach.

We find that both the legitimacy and the acceptance of the technology are poor in Germany, i.e., structural and behavioral factors need to be changed to accommodate the technology. While manufacturers were primarily concerned with efficiency and costs, local citizens were concerned with traffic impact and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
314
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution. We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信